Before all you libs have an orgasm, let's be clear that a Hillary win by a significant margin will not be a mandate. It will be a repudiation of Trump. So don't get your hopes up as Hill will still have to deal with a Republican House.

I don't think we will ever see a time again where any Democrat will have a mandate. Republicans win with an ineffective government. They don't want to see government programs work. An ineffective government plays to their message. The majority of the GOP are active saboteurs.

(08-14-2016 01:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I don't think we will ever see a time again where any Democrat will have a mandate. Republicans win with an ineffective government. They don't want to see government programs work. An ineffective government plays to their message. The majority of the GOP are active saboteurs.

It couldn't possibly be that government programs don't work! No! They are being sabotaged!


Give me a ******* break!

An acknowledgement that Trump is toast in November?

(08-14-2016 01:46 PM)TerryD Wrote:  An acknowledgement that Trump is toast in November?

He just held a huge rally in CT, a state thats in play. But keep circle jerking the notion that Hillary is actually ahead in the polls.

James Carville is warning you guys not to get all worked up and then have the giant meltdown in November.

(08-14-2016 01:46 PM)TerryD Wrote:  An acknowledgement that Trump is toast in November?

Only in your dreams is that an acknowledgement of anything. You still haven't acknowledged your paralyzing fear that Hillary gets beaten. Which, I suspect, will happen on the 12th of never.

Honestly,

Anybody that can't see that Trump is TOAST this November honestly doesn't have the IQ for me to engage with. I'll tap you on the head and pat you on the butt to let you go play with your friends in the schoolyard. This thing is so far past your comprehension at this point. Ignorant, deaf, and blind is no way to go through life. He might not get past 200 EV's. HOW in the HELL does he get to 270? He's down by 10 in Pa. Down by 6 in Fl. For any of you Baghdad Bob's. Look at a map and tell me how he gets there. From a rightie source. It's not umpossible!!!!!!!

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438...ps-victory

(08-14-2016 01:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Before all you libs have an orgasm, let's be clear that a Hillary win by a significant margin will not be a mandate. It will be a repudiation of Trump. So don't get your hopes up as Hill will still have to deal with a Republican House.

So you are saying that if she wins in a landslide, it's not a mandate? That's not what Reagan said in 1984.

(08-14-2016 01:40 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(08-14-2016 01:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I don't think we will ever see a time again where any Democrat will have a mandate. Republicans win with an ineffective government. They don't want to see government programs work. An ineffective government plays to their message. The majority of the GOP are active saboteurs.

It couldn't possibly be that government programs don't work! No! They are being sabotaged!


Give me a ******* break!

There are plenty of gov't programs that work. When they become inefficient, you're suppose to change them. Republicans would rather they remain inefficient, instead of making small changes in order to make a point

lol. landslides.

You guys realize that CT is in play, and you're talking about landslides. This is exactly what Carville was warning about.

(08-14-2016 02:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(08-14-2016 01:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Before all you libs have an orgasm, let's be clear that a Hillary win by a significant margin will not be a mandate. It will be a repudiation of Trump. So don't get your hopes up as Hill will still have to deal with a Republican House.

So you are saying that if she wins in a landslide, it's not a mandate? That's not what Reagan said in 1984.

Yep that's exactly what I'm saying. Read the second sentence.

(08-14-2016 01:46 PM)TerryD Wrote:  An acknowledgement that Trump is toast in November?

Nope. I'm simply commenting on the lib posts that have Hillary winning big and pissing on their euphoria.

(08-14-2016 01:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I don't think we will ever see a time again where any Democrat will have a mandate. Republicans win with an ineffective government. They don't want to see government programs work. An ineffective government plays to their message. The majority of the GOP are active saboteurs.

We just hate to see Democrats and Their cronie friends lining Their pockets with tons of taxpayer dollars. Buying power is wrong and Americans are tired of it.

(08-14-2016 01:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I don't think we will ever see a time again where any Democrat will have a mandate. Republicans win with an ineffective government. They don't want to see government programs work. An ineffective government plays to their message. The majority of the GOP are active saboteurs.

If and ineffective government plays to the GOP message then they should win every election in a landslide. Im not sure I can actually think of a single government program that is effective and does much more than give middle class bureaucrats an income stream.

Unsure why it matters. You win, you win.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

(08-14-2016 03:09 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(08-14-2016 02:24 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(08-14-2016 01:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Before all you libs have an orgasm, let's be clear that a Hillary win by a significant margin will not be a mandate. It will be a repudiation of Trump. So don't get your hopes up as Hill will still have to deal with a Republican House.

So you are saying that if she wins in a landslide, it's not a mandate? That's not what Reagan said in 1984.

Yep that's exactly what I'm saying. Read the second sentence.

1984 was a repudiation of Mondale. Hill's gonna have a mandate. She'll split the GOP between the pro and anti-Ryan forces.