(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:24 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:21 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:07 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So they shouldn't try to arrest wanted people?

How did they know he was wanted?

Could have been any number of ways. Shift briefing. Email. Word of mouth.

But how did they know they had the right guy?

Funny watching him try to defend this.

They never got a positive identifictation of this person therefore, they could not have known that they had a warrant out for his arrest.

(07-17-2016 01:27 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:04 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 12:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 12:23 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 11:52 AM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  Then he sat back down without being instructed to do so.

And said "show me a warrant". Which the cops did not produce.

They don't have to have the warrant in hand to effect an arrest.

Cops need to stop ******* with these people. They are just picking at an open wound.

yeah....why do one's job? that's just silly stuff that some people do.....

just for shites and gigs, if that mofo is 24, I'm getting ready to turn 124....

hell, he looks older than Lebron...

#thuglife

#roughlife

#shitehappens

They always want to do their job around the same people. Go do it somewhere else.

(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:24 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:21 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:07 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  So they shouldn't try to arrest wanted people?

How did they know he was wanted?

Could have been any number of ways. Shift briefing. Email. Word of mouth.

But how did they know they had the right guy?

Funny watching him try to defend this.

Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

(07-17-2016 02:47 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:42 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:36 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:29 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  The only thing that comes to mind is a saying my Granddaddy used to use "Anything is possible for idiots"

Freaky. All I know is that I saw your meme and commented on it.

Except the comment was 10 minutes before I posted it. I had already read your BS revolution post before I copied the meme off my Facebook feed.

Are we friends on Facebook? Maybe thats where I saw it.

I can assure you that we are not friends on Facebook.

Would be hilarious if you were.

(07-17-2016 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:24 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:21 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  How did they know he was wanted?

Could have been any number of ways. Shift briefing. Email. Word of mouth.

But how did they know they had the right guy?

Funny watching him try to defend this.

Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

Well how did they know it was him?

Well please accept my apologies. I promise not to reveal what you are going to post before you post it again.

(07-17-2016 02:49 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:24 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Could have been any number of ways. Shift briefing. Email. Word of mouth.

But how did they know they had the right guy?

Funny watching him try to defend this.

Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

Well how did they know it was him?

Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

(07-17-2016 02:18 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:40 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 12:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  They don't have to have the warrant in hand to effect an arrest.

that is correct.....

line 4 all day and the eighth one....

Yup. Got to love folks with a TV drama law degree.

I dont deny that a cop doesnt need a warrant to arrest someone. No one seems to have answered however how the cops thought they had the right person.

Perhaps because we weren't there and not privy to the circumstances that lead up to the incident. Last time I checked you are the only one claiming to be a mind reader here on this BBS.

I hated doing it....but you gotta put him on ignore....the other guys were right....

he'll drive drivel like it's F1....he's a piece of fk'n shite....

he should be permanently banned....and I prolly will for writing such.....I just don't care anymore about that stupid fkr....never did....

(07-17-2016 02:57 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:18 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:40 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  that is correct.....

line 4 all day and the eighth one....

Yup. Got to love folks with a TV drama law degree.

I dont deny that a cop doesnt need a warrant to arrest someone. No one seems to have answered however how the cops thought they had the right person.

Perhaps because we weren't there and not privy to the circumstances that lead up to the incident. Last time I checked you are the only one claiming to be a mind reader here on this BBS.

I hated doing it....but you gotta put him on ignore....the other guys were right....

he'll drive drivel like it's F1....he's a piece of fk'n shite....

he should be permanently banned....and I prolly will for writing such.....I just don't care anymore about that stupid fkr....never did....

You arent going to get banned. You have called me every name in the book and nothing happens to you.

I can't hear you dickhead.....

have a fk'n great day sucking yours...

(07-17-2016 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:49 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 01:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  But how did they know they had the right guy?

Funny watching him try to defend this.

Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

Well how did they know it was him?

Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

(07-17-2016 03:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:49 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:45 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Funny watching him try to defend this.

Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

Well how did they know it was him?

Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

(07-17-2016 03:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:49 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Funny how you backed off the warrant deal when your ignorance was exposed.

Well how did they know it was him?

Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

I never claimed to be a mind reader. I respect the fact however that you admit that the cops made a mistake.

(07-17-2016 03:16 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:49 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Well how did they know it was him?

Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

I never claimed to be a mind reader. I respect the fact however that you admit that the cops made a mistake.

I'm not admitting anything based upon an edited video released by the lawyer of the supposed aggrieved party. That would be you and firmtroll.

I'm waiting for the investigation to be completed before I pass judgement.

(07-17-2016 03:32 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:16 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 02:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Again, I wasn't privy to the decision making process that lead up to the incident.

I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

I never claimed to be a mind reader. I respect the fact however that you admit that the cops made a mistake.

I'm not admitting anything based upon an edited video released by the lawyer of the supposed aggrieved party. That would be you and firmtroll.

I'm waiting for the investigation to be completed before I pass judgement.

So you think the cops may not have the wrong person? It seems pretty clear to me that they dont have the right guy so how is it NOT a mistake?

(07-17-2016 03:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:32 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:16 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:04 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I can respect that. I thought maybe you could make that determination based on the video.

No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

I never claimed to be a mind reader. I respect the fact however that you admit that the cops made a mistake.

I'm not admitting anything based upon an edited video released by the lawyer of the supposed aggrieved party. That would be you and firmtroll.

I'm waiting for the investigation to be completed before I pass judgement.

So you think the cops may not have the wrong person? It seems pretty clear to me that they dont have the right guy so how is it NOT a mistake?

Sure they had the wrong person. It happens all the time. What I'm talking about is the circumstances that led to the taser being deployed.

(07-17-2016 03:36 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:34 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:32 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:16 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-17-2016 03:12 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  No. Again unlike you I don't claim to be a mind reader.

It could have been any number of things. A confidential informant gave them bad info. The subject on the warrant may have previously lived there. One of the officers could have had previous dealings with both subjects and got them confused. I imagine we will find out when the investigation is over.

I never claimed to be a mind reader. I respect the fact however that you admit that the cops made a mistake.

I'm not admitting anything based upon an edited video released by the lawyer of the supposed aggrieved party. That would be you and firmtroll.

I'm waiting for the investigation to be completed before I pass judgement.

So you think the cops may not have the wrong person? It seems pretty clear to me that they dont have the right guy so how is it NOT a mistake?

Sure they had the wrong person. It happens all the time. What I'm talking about is the circumstances that led to the taser being deployed.

I never disputed the use of the taser.