(12-27-2015 08:39 AM)Dukester Wrote: (12-27-2015 01:16 AM)Dukes84 Wrote: (12-26-2015 11:38 AM)Dukester Wrote: CAA is def better this year than recent years, but even if the season were to end today under any measure we'd be a one team conference no matter who won the tournament. Sags have one top 100 team.
CofC RPI 48 or W&M 52 would not get an at-large. This is only a part of the equation - everything else is less favorable. The top teams are a better then recent top CAA teams, and the bottom level teams are much better than the past bottom level teams of the past. We could get a 13 seed if the season were to end today.
But this is nothing like the GMU, VCU, ODU good years.
CAA is currently no. 8 conference...don't recall it being that high even in year with 3 NCAA bids. It certainly wasn't better than that in rating total conference RPI. After last year's showing that's real progress, tremendous in fact.
Here's the difference, the year we had two or three bids we had teams in the top 25 and others getting votes. We also had multiple teams in the Sag top 40. We have one team in the Sag top 100 at this time. Everyone says they don't understand how we are #8. Well - either does anyone else. As you said a #33 RPI Hofstra did not make it. As someone said Matt Brady said there would not be multiple bids out of the CAA this year. The only way the CAA would get multiple bids would be for a team to go 16-2 in conference and lose in the CAA Semi's or Final. It's going to be hard win 16 or even 15 games in the CAA with so few bad teams and so much parity.
Our highest ranked team - W&M (RPI - #51, & Sag - #90) has losses against High Point and Hampton. Those are baaaadddd loses even with the one impressive win at NC State. If NC State improves that could be a ncaa caliber quality win. I don't think it's very likely a team wins 15 in the CAA this year, which I think is the minimum it will take.
I don't think the CAA in 2010-11 had teams ranked in the top 25 until later in the conference season or post season (JMU actually was receiving votes after their winning streak when they were 15-3 that year).
There are some similarities in this years OOC success and 2010-11 although it's obviously a real long shot that they get multiple teams in this year.
In hindsight there really weren't any bad losses OOC by the top teams that season. The other advantage that they had was the bracket buster games late in the year- The CAA fared well in those games (VCU over Wichita, GMU over Northern Iowa). It's a shame they ended that a few years back.
Mason (bad OOC loss- Wofford, good OOC win- Northern Iowa)
ODU (bad OOC loss None- good OOC wins- Clemson, Xavier, Richmond, Dayton)
VCU (bad OOC loss- None- good OOC wins- Wake Forest, UCLA, Wichita State).
Here were the conference records in 2010-2011- Mason won with a 16-2 record, ODU and Hofstra both had 14-4 records, VCU was 12-6, Drexel 11-7, JMU 10-8. They had 6 of 12 teams at the time with over 20 wins after conference play.
A few additional notes:
Hofstra didn't play a good OOC schedule that year so they took VCU who had a better profile and made the CAA championship game vs. ODU.
VCU wasn't that dominant in conference that year including losses to a pre RJ Hunter Georgia State team and JMU at home to end the year (JMU and VCU actually entered the CAA tourney with the same record believe it or not).
I think folks may forget how good ODU was that year- they lost in the last seconds of the first round to Butler- the same Butler team that made the NCAA championship game and lost to Duke in a close game.