(09-08-2014 11:35 PM)badmoonrising13 Wrote:  Again I'm sure it was off topic. I'll go back to making this a football forum. I didn't mean to stoop down to her level.

5 hours and two broken keyboards later.

You've got to give her credit for persistence... Well, petulance...

"Google search: How to spell petulanc"

"Google search: What does petulance mean?"

(09-08-2014 08:45 PM)badmoonrising13 Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 08:43 PM)PrideinthePack Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 08:24 PM)badmoonrising13 Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 08:05 PM)PrideinthePack Wrote:  

(09-08-2014 07:56 PM)badmoonrising13 Wrote:  So if you aren't injured and just watching from the sidelines, you should be given equal opportunity to play and take time from a guy that proved himself? That makes sense.

But Harris WAS injured that's why it's a ridiculous comparison.

Also... One half of football is hardly "proving yourself".

Using your logic, why did Hare get a chance after Maddie? Maddie did nothing to mess up. Since you love small sample sizes shouldn't you be going gaga over Maddie proving himself in his drive?

Well I've complained Carey handling of the QB situation is unlike any I have ever seen before.

Yet you keep trying to make a comparison to it.

I'm slow. You need to explain that to me using examples and details.

Does anyone know what she means by this? She wouldn't explain it.

I'm sure she hasn't answered the questions I posed and never will.

I was actually hoping he was joking about blocking me because I find it really sad that someone is so mentally weak that they resort to blocking someone on a forum. How spineless of a person can you be to not be able to handle when someone tells you that you're wrong. The big bad bully of the internet forces them to make the person go away. I'm at least glad he was able to find the ignore button after an hour. I think he actually hopes I'm a woman to tell his imaginary friends that he interacted with a girl today. Definitely the type of guy that told the teacher in school when she forgot to give the class homework. I'll let scatterbrain get the last word though, I hope he doesn't bring this to other topics flaunting how he blocked me and ruining those threads also.

I do give him credit for being able to type with tearing streaming down his face and clenched fists. Poor guy. The monsters can't get you anymore.

Back to football...lol

Wow! She just won't stop. I don't know what she said but I'm sure it's totally unrelated to topic. I tried to compare Hare's situation now to what Wolfe and Spann went through at similar points of their career when they were facing questions about their abilities. But somehow I let this psycho woman deteriorate this thread. I apologize for my part in this debacle. As for Hare, time will tell and he will get what he deserves eventually. We all do.

And we'll see if Hare deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Wolfe or Spann. I think after one showing Hare's performance matches the eye-opening debut Wolfe and Spann made by leading his team to 23 points in one half and, again, making the best throw I have ever seen by an NIU QB.

Did I mention that he also made a bunch of mistakes that are correctable? Well, I did earlier.

(09-08-2014 08:15 PM)7 Wrote:  I'm not sure what these "Hare has to be the guy" people are even arguing right now. He should start Saturday, nobody is arguing that. If he plays really well, he should continue to play. If he doesn't, he has in no way put enough space between himself and Maddie/Mac to just continue to play.

This really isn't hard.

One would think the decision is easy, but I think many people are fearful that Carey continues the QB rotation on a not-performance-based level.