You're funny.

(07-26-2014 01:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

Its not so much the stats they report but they way they enjoy putting an emphasis on "muslim" and not so much terrorist is why they are a hate site.

That and "Religion of Peace" being its name. And a certain poster on this forum calling them towel heads. But yeah this is not a website aimed at blurring the lines and slandering Islam as a whole

Dude, Obama won't even use the word terrorist and now you're criticizing a website for not using it? And the Religion of Peace is what Ali Baba and the flying carpeteers call themselves. They made their bad, now they have to sleep in it.

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

(07-26-2014 01:22 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

Its not so much the stats they report but they way they enjoy putting an emphasis on "muslim" and not so much terrorist is why they are a hate site.

That and "Religion of Peace" being its name. And a certain poster on this forum calling them towel heads. But yeah this is not a website aimed at blurring the lines and slandering Islam as a whole

Dude, Obama won't even use the word terrorist and now you're criticizing a website for not using it? And the Religion of Peace is what Ali Baba and the flying carpeteers call themselves. They made their bad, now they have to sleep in it.

its not the use of the word terrorist but needlessly attaching terrorism to all Muslims.

You can in a not bigoted fashion keep stats on X amount of terrorism. But the way that website is branded it clearly is bigoted.

(07-26-2014 01:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:22 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

Its not so much the stats they report but they way they enjoy putting an emphasis on "muslim" and not so much terrorist is why they are a hate site.

That and "Religion of Peace" being its name. And a certain poster on this forum calling them towel heads. But yeah this is not a website aimed at blurring the lines and slandering Islam as a whole

Dude, Obama won't even use the word terrorist and now you're criticizing a website for not using it? And the Religion of Peace is what Ali Baba and the flying carpeteers call themselves. They made their bad, now they have to sleep in it.

its not the use of the word terrorist but needlessly attaching terrorism to all Muslims.

You can in a not bigoted fashion keep stats on X amount of terrorism. But the way that website is branded it clearly is bigoted.

Why, because Allah provides them with so many stories of human death and destruction? Your problem is with Islam and the people who will kill because of it, not the people who report it.

BTW, are the Islamists who kill Christians bigots or just the people on the website who report it?

(07-26-2014 01:12 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel at this point!

congrats on being the first poster added to my ignore list. You are literally the most pathetic poster that I have come across on csnbbs.

1. aggressively stalking me like this across multiple treads like this with potshot comments aimed only at to flame while providing zero discussion.

2. continuing to call me out for not serving your standards of forum etiquette while giving everyone else on this forum a pass for doing the exact same thing I do only more frequently.

Get a life you fu.cken loser.

I would like to point out that we both joined the same month and year, yet you have 6k+ posts more than me. Yet you have the fuucking gall to tell me to get a life? I already have a life you f'ing loser!!!! I don't spend all my free time on here like you do!!!!!!!!!

(07-26-2014 01:36 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:22 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

Its not so much the stats they report but they way they enjoy putting an emphasis on "muslim" and not so much terrorist is why they are a hate site.

That and "Religion of Peace" being its name. And a certain poster on this forum calling them towel heads. But yeah this is not a website aimed at blurring the lines and slandering Islam as a whole

Dude, Obama won't even use the word terrorist and now you're criticizing a website for not using it? And the Religion of Peace is what Ali Baba and the flying carpeteers call themselves. They made their bad, now they have to sleep in it.

its not the use of the word terrorist but needlessly attaching terrorism to all Muslims.

You can in a not bigoted fashion keep stats on X amount of terrorism. But the way that website is branded it clearly is bigoted.

Why, because Allah provides them with so many stories of human death and destruction? Your problem is with Islam and the people who will kill because of it, not the people who report it.

BTW, are the Islamists who kill Christians bigots or just the people on the website who report it?

The one who tries to compare themselves to the most disgusting people on earth and how he is better than them in attempt to clear his own name is the one who is using a losing arguement.

if your quote is "well i am at least better than ISIS & the Taliban" then there is not much to say.

I am not defending those ********, but what I am defending are the regular Muslims who have to have their religion slandered by the crazy fundamentals AND the ******** like you who use those guys to forward your anti Muslim rhetoric.

I don't think I have ever once heard you guys mention Malala Yousafzai in all my time on csnbbs. Maybe if you guys educated yourself on stuff like that y'all wouldn't be filled with so much hate.

You are a loser troll Jo0, cant answer a simple yes or no question.

And yet you can't put forward a legitimate argument.

(07-26-2014 01:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  I don't think I have ever once heard you guys mention Malala Yousafzai in all my time on csnbbs. Maybe if you guys educated yourself on stuff like that y'all wouldn't be filled with so much hate.

Do you know who Barbara Kaplan is? Ever hear of her?

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source". 10% is the number I most often run across. As I said, I don't believe it's that low. It runs well over 50% in some countries. Again, google it if you have any interest discovering what's widely held. Pews done surveys. So has Gallop. If you prefer others, check with them. They come at it from "x% are against" so it's easy, if you're capable of simple math, to extrapolate remaining numbers. Polling of actual Muslims say it's higher.

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

Ok, what number would you put it at? And did you ***** about the pictures I posted?

Was there a point to posting a ton of gore pics? Are you trying to shock people into agreeing with you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(07-26-2014 04:39 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

Ok, what number would you put it at? And did you ***** about the pictures I posted?

TBH, he didn't. I just stumbled across it.

(07-26-2014 04:39 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  Was there a point to posting a ton of gore pics? Are you trying to shock people into agreeing with you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smn has a history of pulling this cr.ap

Normally I put up with it but posting a picture of a decapitated child who looks like she was 4-5 years old is just beyond sick.

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

“I have plenty of Muslim friends myself. They are not all radicals,” he said. “The statistics say 10-15 percent … extrapolated from 1.59 billion (Muslims worldwide) and you have close to the amount of Americans we have that are considered to be radical.”

Link

Ok, I posted a source. Now your job as a liberal is to criticize that source in 3....2.....1.....NOW

(07-26-2014 04:44 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:39 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  Was there a point to posting a ton of gore pics? Are you trying to shock people into agreeing with you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smn has a history of pulling this cr.ap

Normally I put up with it but a posting a picture of a decapitated child who looks like she was 4-5 years old is just beyond sick.

If posting it was beyond sick, then how sick was the Muslim who actually did it?

And I have a history? Put up or shut up.

(07-26-2014 04:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

“I have plenty of Muslim friends myself. They are not all radicals,” he said. “The statistics say 10-15 percent … extrapolated from 1.59 billion (Muslims worldwide) and you have close to the amount of Americans we have that are considered to be radical.”

Link

Ok, I posted a source. Now your job as a liberal is to criticize that source in 3....2.....1.....NOW

Your "source" is from someone who thinks Islam is the Anti christ.......

(07-26-2014 04:46 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:44 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:39 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  Was there a point to posting a ton of gore pics? Are you trying to shock people into agreeing with you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smn has a history of pulling this cr.ap

Normally I put up with it but a posting a picture of a decapitated child who looks like she was 4-5 years old is just beyond sick.

If posting it was beyond sick, then how sick was the Muslim who actually did it?

And I have a history? Put up or shut up.

you didn't need pictures to get that point across. Especially one of a decapitated child.