(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

(07-26-2014 12:33 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:16 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:13 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 11:38 AM)john01992 Wrote:  "Islam, the religion of death and destruction."

Maybe not all of them believe in that, but far too many of them do, and if you deny that then there's no point in having a sensible conversation with you. BTW, have you seen my signature?

the issue with you is "far too many" is still an extremely small minority as compared to the religion as a whole. Every religion has its bad parts throughout world history. Every religion has its crazies, and a lot of it isn't so much the result of the religion itself but the lack of education, poverty, and non democratic states that a large majority of these guys come from.

Bigotry is the one who opts to ignore all that and say "no it's because they have a religion that I personally dislike"

Extremely conservative estimates say you are wrong unless you now want to argue 120 million is "an extremely small minority".

WBC is what, a dozen people? Among over 2 billion, now that's "an extremely small minority".

And what's the source for that 120 mill figure?

It's the most common estimate thrown about. 10%. Easily conservative. Far more than that are identified when answering polling questions.

Google.

(07-26-2014 12:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:16 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:13 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 11:38 AM)john01992 Wrote:  "Islam, the religion of death and destruction."

Maybe not all of them believe in that, but far too many of them do, and if you deny that then there's no point in having a sensible conversation with you. BTW, have you seen my signature?

the issue with you is "far too many" is still an extremely small minority as compared to the religion as a whole. Every religion has its bad parts throughout world history. Every religion has its crazies, and a lot of it isn't so much the result of the religion itself but the lack of education, poverty, and non democratic states that a large majority of these guys come from.

Bigotry is the one who opts to ignore all that and say "no it's because they have a religion that I personally dislike"

Extremely conservative estimates say you are wrong unless you now want to argue 120 million is "an extremely small minority".

WBC is what, a dozen people? Among over 2 billion, now that's "an extremely small minority".

And 72% of them gave Obama a positive job approval rating.

(07-26-2014 12:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:33 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:16 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:13 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Maybe not all of them believe in that, but far too many of them do, and if you deny that then there's no point in having a sensible conversation with you. BTW, have you seen my signature?

the issue with you is "far too many" is still an extremely small minority as compared to the religion as a whole. Every religion has its bad parts throughout world history. Every religion has its crazies, and a lot of it isn't so much the result of the religion itself but the lack of education, poverty, and non democratic states that a large majority of these guys come from.

Bigotry is the one who opts to ignore all that and say "no it's because they have a religion that I personally dislike"

Extremely conservative estimates say you are wrong unless you now want to argue 120 million is "an extremely small minority".

WBC is what, a dozen people? Among over 2 billion, now that's "an extremely small minority".

And what's the source for that 120 mill figure?

It's the most common estimate thrown about. 10%. Easily conservative. Far more than that are identified when answering polling questions.

Google.

I'd like to see your source.

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

(07-26-2014 12:38 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:34 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:22 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:13 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Or you guys can keep your bigotry in check by not labeling an entire religion as terrorists based on what a minority of islamic fundamentalists do.

Would you appreciate it if someone pinned the WBC as reflective of christianity as a whole?

You asked me to point out where in this thread you called somebody a bigot. I bolded it for you. Just in case you get selective blindness.

notice how the first time I didn't wasn't until WELL AFTER you made those comments.

notice how when i said "keep your bigotry in check" it was in regards to something that was legitimately bigoted

notice how that was the first time I have done that in this thread whereas the GOPers have done it easily 20+ times.

No you don't notice this because you are either a pathetic troll or too blind in your own personal vendetta against me to see reality.

No it wasn't. You really need a dictionary. Words have meanings. Learn them. Stop just throwing words about because of your flaming intolerance. And stupidity.

If labeling an entire religion as "the religion of death and destruction" not a bigoted statement then you need a serious reality check.

Not read the Koran hum? Short on your Islamic history?

CliffsNotes: Islam=death and destruction.

(07-26-2014 12:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

Do you think I care what I call my enemy? And instead of simply calling that website a hate site, why don't you explain to all of us why reporting the facts of Islamic barbarism is hate?

Liberals view the world through several means, mostly their line of reasoning includes supposition, imagination, speculation, inference, induction, inspiration, and revelation. They also include dreams and mystical enlightenments.

Another way liberals get their world is by parents, peers, friends, teachers, high priests (Reid), kings (Zero), politicians, and professionals all who tell you what to believe. A questionable method that is high on tradition, precedent, and expertise. No logical or critical thinking involved here, it is knowledge through osmosis.

Deductive reasoning is lost on liberals, they rather contemplate their belly-buttons.

There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

(07-26-2014 12:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel at this point!

Did the brown shirts act this way?
Just absolute adherence to the supreme being.
Same as the Progressives.
No wonder they identify with militant Islamists.
Same with them.

(07-26-2014 12:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

They aggregate news. Can you point to some hate from that site? Any falsehoods? Do you not understand reporting about hateful acts are not the hateful acts?

(07-26-2014 12:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:33 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:16 PM)john01992 Wrote:  the issue with you is "far too many" is still an extremely small minority as compared to the religion as a whole. Every religion has its bad parts throughout world history. Every religion has its crazies, and a lot of it isn't so much the result of the religion itself but the lack of education, poverty, and non democratic states that a large majority of these guys come from.

Bigotry is the one who opts to ignore all that and say "no it's because they have a religion that I personally dislike"

Extremely conservative estimates say you are wrong unless you now want to argue 120 million is "an extremely small minority".

WBC is what, a dozen people? Among over 2 billion, now that's "an extremely small minority".

And what's the source for that 120 mill figure?

It's the most common estimate thrown about. 10%. Easily conservative. Far more than that are identified when answering polling questions.

Google.

I'd like to see your source.

I spelled it for you. Maybe you don't know to add a dot com to it?

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  There have been 23,470 Islamic attacks since 9/11, and 2808 people were murdered by Islamists just last month and the website reporting it are the ones who hate. John, you're insane. Absolutely, certifiably, insane.

Its not so much the stats they report but they way they enjoy putting an emphasis on "muslim" and not so much terrorist is why they are a hate site.

That and "Religion of Peace" being its name. And a certain poster on this forum calling them towel heads. But yeah this is not a website aimed at blurring the lines and slandering Islam as a whole

(07-26-2014 01:08 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:53 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:50 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:33 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:30 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Extremely conservative estimates say you are wrong unless you now want to argue 120 million is "an extremely small minority".

WBC is what, a dozen people? Among over 2 billion, now that's "an extremely small minority".

And what's the source for that 120 mill figure?

It's the most common estimate thrown about. 10%. Easily conservative. Far more than that are identified when answering polling questions.

Google.

I'd like to see your source.

I spelled it for you. Maybe you don't know to and a dot com to it?

Guess this means you can't provide one.

I already know the answer. I'm not doing your homework.

(07-26-2014 01:00 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:54 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:49 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 12:24 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Ah so what your perceive as how the left thinks of tea partiers is justification for actions that you and a number of other posters have taken which is a very disturbing trend of linking a website that is basically an anti-islamic hate site in your sigs?

No the two are not comparable at all because I can't think of one liberal on this forum who feels the need to actually attack another religion in his sig.

Anti Islamic hate site? Dude, the towel heads blow themselves up in their attempt to kill the non believers, this site reports it and it's hate? If they'd stop killing people in the name of their religion then this site would have nothing to report. Sadly, Allah & Co keep them supplied with plenty of fresh material. You libs do the same thing when we criticize Obama, you call us racists.

But if you think there's nothing to be afraid of then draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it using your name. You won't because you know there's a decent chance you'll be beheaded and when the web site we're talking about reports it you'll still consider them the haters and not the Muslims.

Thank god you're not in a combat unit because enemy recognition is not your strong suit.

you sure are not helping your case. The fact that you don't understand how that is a hate site makes it pretty clear that you are a bigot yourself.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel at this point!

congrats on being the first poster added to my ignore list. You are literally the most pathetic poster that I have come across on csnbbs.

1. aggressively stalking me like this across multiple treads like this with potshot comments aimed only at to flame while providing zero discussion.

2. continuing to call me out for not serving your standards of forum etiquette while giving everyone else on this forum a pass for doing the exact same thing I do only more frequently.

Get a life you fu.cken loser.

"emphasis" is hate. Ok, cool, now I understand you.

(07-26-2014 01:10 PM)Paul M Wrote:  I already know the answer. I'm not doing your homework.

No and fu.ck you

I want to know what YOUR SOURCE is because i want to know where you get YOUR INFORMATION from.

(07-26-2014 01:13 PM)Paul M Wrote:  "emphasis" is hate. Ok, cool, now I understand you.

it's only a to someone who is bigoted.