That still doesn't change the fact that Rand Paul has been soft on illegal immigration, amnesty and would most likely ensure that pot is legal in all 50 states....instead of securing our border and following our laws

nor am I a supporter of McCain. I think he is a softy as well. He tends to be more Libertarian. However, the OP's premise is that "neocons" are voting for Hillary when in fact it was nothing but some dumb liberal spin based on a joke.

Paul supports border enforcement. Pot should be a state issue. I'm not necessarily for legalization, but it isn't a deal breaker as far as I am concerned and I am not going to agree with anyone 100% of the time, even Cruz. Paul says some head-scratchers from time to time, but the record is the record. He has been solid.

(07-08-2014 09:10 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Paul supports border enforcement. Pot should be a state issue. I'm not necessarily for legalization, but it isn't a deal breaker as far as I am concerned and I am not going to agree with anyone 100% of the time, even Cruz. Paul says some head-scratchers from time to time, but the record is the record. He has been solid.

he says that, but in television interviews he's always talking about a path to citizenship. I get that same bad feeling from Paul that I did from Obama.

OKIE- ever think about running for Presient? you certainly do seem to have a handle on things and probably have all the solutions.

John McCain is a libertarian. I've heard it all now.

(07-08-2014 09:36 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  OKIE- ever think about running for Presient? you certainly do seem to have a handle on things and probably have all the solutions.

I would begin to set things straight my very first week in office. It would be uncomfortable for a while as I began to purge the liberal disease from the arteries of our nation. The healing process would be also be uncomfortable...but recovery would be quick as begin our rise back to greatness.

Many people on this forum are much smarter than the people screwing up this nation.

(07-08-2014 09:38 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  John McCain is a libertarian. I've heard it all now.

Ever been to Arizona?

(07-08-2014 09:41 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:36 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  OKIE- ever think about running for Presient? you certainly do seem to have a handle on things and probably have all the solutions.

I would begin to set things straight my very first week in office. It would be uncomfortable for a while as I began to purge the liberal disease from the arteries of our nation. The healing process would be also be uncomfortable...but recovery would be quick as begin our rise back to greatness.

Many people on this forum are much smarter than the people screwing up this nation.

Priceless!! You know before "least restrictive environment" became law they had a place to keep people like you safe.

(07-08-2014 09:49 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:41 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 09:36 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  OKIE- ever think about running for Presient? you certainly do seem to have a handle on things and probably have all the solutions.

I would begin to set things straight my very first week in office. It would be uncomfortable for a while as I began to purge the liberal disease from the arteries of our nation. The healing process would be also be uncomfortable...but recovery would be quick as begin our rise back to greatness.

Many people on this forum are much smarter than the people screwing up this nation.

Priceless!! You know before "least restrictive environment" became law they had a place to keep people like you safe.

Let me direct you to this thread. See if you can find which of the 15 examples best describes this comment and your overall reaction to common sense.
http://csnbbs.com/thread-694458.html

(07-08-2014 07:28 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:24 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  If it Warren vs Hillary I will likely Caucus with the dems this time around to make sure the lesser of two evils is on the final ticket.

Who would be the lesser of the evils in this case?

Im not sure yet....

(07-08-2014 07:33 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:24 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  If it Warren vs Hillary I will likely Caucus with the dems this time around to make sure the lesser of two evils is on the final ticket.

Don't think your one little ol" vote would insure the outcome of the final ticket.

Ever been to a caucus?

The only reason I'd support Hillary is because for her to win she must destroy the Obama legacy beyond all repair. The idea that Obama will be put where he belongs is appealing.

(07-08-2014 10:15 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The only reason I'd support Hillary is because for her to win she must destroy the Obama legacy beyond all repair. The idea that Obama will be put where he belongs is appealing.

Would you actually vote for her?

(07-08-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:33 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:24 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  If it Warren vs Hillary I will likely Caucus with the dems this time around to make sure the lesser of two evils is on the final ticket.

Don't think your one little ol" vote would insure the outcome of the final ticket.

Ever been to a caucus?

at myself.

I totally, thoroughly and completely miss-read Caucus. I read "I'll do the Mississippi shuffle and vote in the Dem Primary". Woke on the left side of my bed.

Elizabeth Warren would finish off the country.
Can understand preventing that catastrophe.

(07-08-2014 08:47 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 08:39 AM)EagleX Wrote:  this is a bullsh!t story from the bullsh!t NYT. ONE GUY, and a mccainian at that, is talking about voting for hillary instead of the rand, should rand be nominated. ONE GUY.

use your heads, republicans. it was just a few weeks ago that the freaking times was getting everyone spun up because they said that house republicans were going to pass amnesty.


use.your.heads.

Get used to it. The GOP establishment has proven that when they lose, they take their ball and go home. Charlie Crist, Arlen Specter, Lisa Murkowski... etc. They will switch parties in a heartbeat. At best they will sit on the sidelines and idle through the election, cutting off financial support like they did to Ken Cuccinelli. Make no mistake, if Jeb Bush (or someone of that ilk) is not nominated, it will be a lot more than ONE GUY. I would also not be surprised if one of them ran as an independent. These people are not allies, they are the enemy every bit as much as the democrats.

wait. you're trying to argue that an "establishment" republican (totally ignoring the meaning and value of the word "establishment") would run as an independent should jeb bush not get the nomination, and as evidence for this crack-addled theory, you submit the example of arlen specter re-flipping back to the democrat party -- his home for 15 years before he was a republican.

this is honestly pretty stupid.

(07-08-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:33 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-08-2014 07:24 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  If it Warren vs Hillary I will likely Caucus with the dems this time around to make sure the lesser of two evils is on the final ticket.

Don't think your one little ol" vote would insure the outcome of the final ticket.

Ever been to a caucus?

a caucus is a small riot. it's the dumbest way I can imagine to pick your nominee for a major office.

(07-08-2014 07:30 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Hillary is too old, feeble-minded, blood-soaked and has too much baggage (read slick willy) to be viable.

What's funny is that the vast majority of the libs don't realize a neocon is basically a liberal except for anything that deals with support for Israel.

(07-08-2014 11:57 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  What's funny is that the vast majority of the libs don't realize a neocon is basically a liberal except for anything that deals with support for Israel.

Correct. A neocon is a domestic conservative with a liberal, nation building foreign policy.