(05-18-2014 11:39 PM)uofmcamaro Wrote:  

(05-16-2014 11:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Wouldn't be a big deal except he then ran around playing Santa Clause. haha,

could he tell them they have to now go retrieve all the money he "mistakenly" handed out to complete strangers? Not entirely sure what the difference is here.

But, as someone said above, it is comparable to a Bank and their discovering a proofing error. No way would you be allowed to keep that money.

Nor should you be allowed to.

Uhh, ok?

(05-19-2014 01:07 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(05-18-2014 11:39 PM)uofmcamaro Wrote:  

(05-16-2014 11:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Wouldn't be a big deal except he then ran around playing Santa Clause. haha,

could he tell them they have to now go retrieve all the money he "mistakenly" handed out to complete strangers? Not entirely sure what the difference is here.

But, as someone said above, it is comparable to a Bank and their discovering a proofing error. No way would you be allowed to keep that money.

Nor should you be allowed to.

Uhh, ok?

Do you feel that a human error should be sufficient reason for you to keep what is not rightfully yours?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Would think they would be too embarrassed to admit the error.

(05-19-2014 06:43 AM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Would think they would be too embarrassed to admit the error.

Depends on the error. $10 bucks, probably no big deal, $10,000,000 you are probably going to get a letter.