Get a clue fool, Gary is much more insightful than Patrick.

(04-14-2014 10:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Get a clue fool, Gary is much more insightful than Patrick.

Exactly. That's why you remind me of Patrick.

(04-14-2014 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 07:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 12:43 PM)Crebman Wrote:  ...an accomplishment that remotely points to being a good president.

Could you please elaborate on what you believe such an accomplishment would be?

How about actually DOING something? Her supposed qualifications are what she has BEEN. What has she actually DONE while in the process of being all these things?

It really cracks me up when you act stupid. I'm sure while working at a law firm, being a senator and leading the state department among other things, that she did nothing but sit at a desk all day and play minesweeper.

Yeah...this is clearly the wiki page of someone who has done nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

Moron.

Again, i know of lawyers who pretty much did _zilch_ in terms of major meaningful legislation in their times as lawyers.

I've seen Senators who were known as voting "present" over and over. Senators who have not proposed any major legislation, or co-signed with 30 or 40 OTHER senators at the same time. What major legislation did HRC AUTHOR or initiate while she was a Senator.

Again, name her SUCCESSFUL accomplishments while she was at Sect of State position.

I'm still waiting for some _specifics_, Tom.

(04-14-2014 11:00 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 07:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 12:43 PM)Crebman Wrote:  ...an accomplishment that remotely points to being a good president.

Could you please elaborate on what you believe such an accomplishment would be?

How about actually DOING something? Her supposed qualifications are what she has BEEN. What has she actually DONE while in the process of being all these things?

It really cracks me up when you act stupid. I'm sure while working at a law firm, being a senator and leading the state department among other things, that she did nothing but sit at a desk all day and play minesweeper.

Yeah...this is clearly the wiki page of someone who has done nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

Moron.

Again, i know of lawyers who pretty much did _zilch_ in terms of major meaningful legislation in their times as lawyers.

I've seen Senators who were known as voting "present" over and over. Senators who have not proposed any major legislation, or co-signed with 30 or 40 OTHER senators at the same time. What major legislation did HRC AUTHOR or initiate while she was a Senator.

Again, name her SUCCESSFUL accomplishments while she was at Sect of State position.

I'm still waiting for some _specifics_, Tom.

Take away her last name and she would be chasing ambulances somewhere. Her accomplishment was getting married to Bill.

I worked quite a bit with her law firm in Little Rock. Her job there was basically to be the governor's wife.

(04-15-2014 06:54 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I worked quite a bit with her law firm in Little Rock. Her job there was basically to be the governor's wife.

No way!?! once again...the most amazing man on the internet has identified another area of experience that just so happens to apply to the exact obscure item I mention.

Why the hell again do you waste time on this meaningless message board with all your life experiences.

(04-14-2014 11:00 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 07:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 12:43 PM)Crebman Wrote:  ...an accomplishment that remotely points to being a good president.

Could you please elaborate on what you believe such an accomplishment would be?

How about actually DOING something? Her supposed qualifications are what she has BEEN. What has she actually DONE while in the process of being all these things?

It really cracks me up when you act stupid. I'm sure while working at a law firm, being a senator and leading the state department among other things, that she did nothing but sit at a desk all day and play minesweeper.

Yeah...this is clearly the wiki page of someone who has done nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

Moron.

Again, i know of lawyers who pretty much did _zilch_ in terms of major meaningful legislation in their times as lawyers.

I've seen Senators who were known as voting "present" over and over. Senators who have not proposed any major legislation, or co-signed with 30 or 40 OTHER senators at the same time. What major legislation did HRC AUTHOR or initiate while she was a Senator.

Again, name her SUCCESSFUL accomplishments while she was at Sect of State position.

I'm still waiting for some _specifics_, Tom.

Dude, this discussion does not involve you. It is also not related to the success or failure of her accomplishments.

If you don't know what's being discussed, don't participate.

Fried chicken taste good.

(04-15-2014 10:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 06:54 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I worked quite a bit with her law firm in Little Rock. Her job there was basically to be the governor's wife.

No way!?! once again...the most amazing man on the internet has identified another area of experience that just so happens to apply to the exact obscure item I mention.
Why the hell again do you waste time on this meaningless message board with all your life experiences.

What can I say?

Some of us have actually done things in our lives. In this case, it was financial consulting to Arkansas cities where Hillary's firm just happened to be bond counsel. Hmmm, Bill was governor and Hillary's law firm was bond counsel for what seemed like every city in the state. Wonder how that ever happened?

Hillary was not an ambulance chaser. She was a rainmaker, pure and simple. As nearly as I could tell from the stories being told about her, her other primary duty was apparently to make sure that no hot young associate--male or female--ever suffered from not receiving enough sexual advances.

(04-15-2014 12:43 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 10:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 06:54 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I worked quite a bit with her law firm in Little Rock. Her job there was basically to be the governor's wife.

No way!?! once again...the most amazing man on the internet has identified another area of experience that just so happens to apply to the exact obscure item I mention.
Why the hell again do you waste time on this meaningless message board with all your life experiences.

What can I say?

Some of us have actually done things in our lives. In this case, it was financial consulting to Arkansas cities where Hillary's firm just happened to be bond counsel. Hmmm, Bill was governor and Hillary's law firm was bond counsel for what seemed like every city in the state. Wonder how that ever happened?

Hillary was not an ambulance chaser. She was a rainmaker, pure and simple. As nearly as I could tell from the stories being told about her, her other primary duty was apparently to make sure that no hot young associate--male or female--ever suffered from not receiving enough sexual advances.

And I hear stories being told that Hillary and Bill have killed dozens for political gains...doesn't make them true.

And then there's this.

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/c...016vFVdXzE

(04-15-2014 01:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And I hear stories being told that Hillary and Bill have killed dozens for political gains...doesn't make them true.

Doesn't make them false either, does it?

And I'm pretty sure that my sources are better than the sources for the stories you reference.

(04-15-2014 10:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 11:00 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 10:24 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 07:14 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 02:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Could you please elaborate on what you believe such an accomplishment would be?

How about actually DOING something? Her supposed qualifications are what she has BEEN. What has she actually DONE while in the process of being all these things?

It really cracks me up when you act stupid. I'm sure while working at a law firm, being a senator and leading the state department among other things, that she did nothing but sit at a desk all day and play minesweeper.

Yeah...this is clearly the wiki page of someone who has done nothing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton

Moron.

Again, i know of lawyers who pretty much did _zilch_ in terms of major meaningful legislation in their times as lawyers.

I've seen Senators who were known as voting "present" over and over. Senators who have not proposed any major legislation, or co-signed with 30 or 40 OTHER senators at the same time. What major legislation did HRC AUTHOR or initiate while she was a Senator.

Again, name her SUCCESSFUL accomplishments while she was at Sect of State position.

I'm still waiting for some _specifics_, Tom.

Dude, this discussion does not involve you. It is also not related to the success or failure of her accomplishments.

If you don't know what's being discussed, don't participate.

You can't answer the question; so you tell me to shut up?

Tom, I'm defended some of your opinions in the past, when you were reasonable and rational in your discussion. But this is the Tom that sticks his fingers in his ears and goes.. "lalalalala... I'm not listening".

This is the childish Tom, and you should be _ashamed_ of yourself.

DSF, we're not arguing what you want me to defend. We never were. And I've answered your question before in countless other threads. There's no point to doing it again.

There is no test for presidential qualifications! My ideas of qualifications likely differ from yours. We have that freedom because the Constitution gave that to us by specifically not instituting a test.

There is no point to listing what I feel qualifies her because they don't matter to most that are here, and I'm not going to influence any of you.

Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” (quote)


Sounds familiar.

From your original post:

"There is “relentless scrutiny"

Guess what.. that's part of the SCRUTINY that you refuse to discuss.

(04-15-2014 04:35 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  From your original post:

"There is “relentless scrutiny"

Guess what.. that's part of the SCRUTINY that you refuse to discuss.

Who are you talking to?