(03-05-2014 12:54 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  DUDE, YOU'RE ******* HOPELESS. She wasn't going to testify. Everyone knew that. Issa called her anyway. That's the stunt. Period. Now move along.

No need for an investigation? A political stunt? Well, in the words of Lois Lerner herself...."Tea Party matter very dangerous"

So you sir are in denial and wrong. Of course you won't admit it now. Libs never do. Deny, deny, deny is what you do.

Moron...start at the beginning. The stunt was calling Lerner, AGAIN. She was never going to testify today...everyone knew this.

What Lerner and the IRS did was wrong.

How many times do I need to keep saying it.

(03-05-2014 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 12:54 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  DUDE, YOU'RE ******* HOPELESS. She wasn't going to testify. Everyone knew that. Issa called her anyway. That's the stunt. Period. Now move along.

No need for an investigation? A political stunt? Well, in the words of Lois Lerner herself...."Tea Party matter very dangerous"

So you sir are in denial and wrong. Of course you won't admit it now. Libs never do. Deny, deny, deny is what you do.

Moron...start at the beginning. The stunt was calling Lerner, AGAIN. She was never going to testify today...everyone knew this.

What Lerner and the IRS did was wrong.

How many times do I need to keep saying it.

Now you play the moron card. So you really think Lerner was the genesis of this and the only one that did wrong? Who is the moron?

After seeing her email, I can understand why she fears for her life.

This whole using the IRS to silence political opposition p!sses me off to no end and the people involved should go to jail.

With that said, without granting her immunity, I can't see why you would call her to testify again. Why would her stance change if there is nothing beneficial to her for spilling what she knows?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the judicial system play this game all the time - they want the bigger drug fish, so they offer immunity to the low guy for spilling the beans?

(03-05-2014 01:42 PM)Crebman Wrote:  This whole using the IRS to silence political opposition p!sses me off to no end and the people involved should go to jail.

With that said, without granting her immunity, I can't see why you would call her to testify again. Why would her stance change if there is nothing beneficial to her for spilling what she knows?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the judicial system play this game all the time - they want the bigger drug fish, so they offer immunity to the low guy for spilling the beans?

If they have really incriminating evidence on her, they will hold out the immunity card in my opinion. It will be a last resort.

Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

(03-05-2014 01:03 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:00 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 12:54 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  DUDE, YOU'RE ******* HOPELESS. She wasn't going to testify. Everyone knew that. Issa called her anyway. That's the stunt. Period. Now move along.

No need for an investigation? A political stunt? Well, in the words of Lois Lerner herself...."Tea Party matter very dangerous"

So you sir are in denial and wrong. Of course you won't admit it now. Libs never do. Deny, deny, deny is what you do.

Moron...start at the beginning. The stunt was calling Lerner, AGAIN. She was never going to testify today...everyone knew this.

What Lerner and the IRS did was wrong.

How many times do I need to keep saying it.

Now you play the moron card. So you really think Lerner was the genesis of this and the only one that did wrong? Who is the moron?

Because you're projecting things on me that I never said and don't believe, and I've never even discussed this with you either. You're trying to pile onto a situation you know nothing about.

I never said Lerner was the genesis of this and I never said she was the only one who did anything wrong.

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

(03-05-2014 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

In your world, if it goes against your leftist pals, it is a stunt. We get it already.

Until that email shows up in the public (even if it's redacted to prevent names from getting out), I have my doubts about her claim.

I still think Lerner's playing a dangerous game here... and she could find herself in contempt. (again, when she made her opening statement last time, she revoked her 5th amendment right, IMO.)

(03-05-2014 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

You want to know what a stunt is? A stunt is Eric Holder appointing a huge Obama supporter to do his IRS investigation. Of course in your world that makes perfect sense.

(03-05-2014 02:19 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

In your world, if it goes against your leftist pals, it is a stunt. We get it already.

Well thankfully, in my world, everything isn't some damned conspiracy to keep me down. That's a world I want no part of living in. You enjoy it though mmmkay?

(03-05-2014 02:22 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

You want to know what a stunt is? A stunt is Eric Holder appointing a huge Obama supporter to do his IRS investigation. Of course in your world that makes perfect sense.

A stunt is changing Obamacare to suit election cycles.

(03-05-2014 02:22 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2014 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Immunity or pardon, what would be your choice?

Issa basically told you all you need to know today. Further proving that this was nothing but a stunt! Or more yet, a last ditch effort to a total failure.

"But Ms. Lerner is not our primary concern today, nor is the contempt." ~ Darrell Issa, 3/5/14

You want to know what a stunt is? A stunt is Eric Holder appointing a huge Obama supporter to do his IRS investigation. Of course in your world that makes perfect sense.

There you go agin with your erroneous projections. Why don't you think for yourself instead of blindly following the masses around here.

I would actually prefer someone that wasn't affiliated with either in any way shape or form.