CSNbbs

Not buying it. It is a surprising thing to say though.

Lois Lerner fears for her life if she testifies openly before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Wednesday, according to her attorney.

House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa announced Sunday that Lerner will testify at Wednesday’s hearing, but Lerner’s attorney Bill Taylor said that Lerner will seek to continue invoking her Fifth Amendment rights and will also seek a one-week delay of her testimony.

Oversight members are reportedly open to granting Lerner a one-week delay if she petitions for one in person at Wednesday’s hearing. The delay would allow Lerner’s lawyers to continue negotiating for immunity, which they have been doing since at least September.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/04/lois-l...t-hearing/

Killary has her on her enemies list?

Like taking the 5th, what does she fear? Is she implying that she knows things that others would kill over as to prevent those things from getting out?

Those krazy Tea Baggers shure er dangeris.

She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

Well, Ms Lerner, when you lay down with dogs, why so surprised that you get up with fleas?

I suspect that she has fears about some on the right but has much more fear from her 'masters' in this administration. She probably got a reminder that real team players don't snitch and what the potential consequences might be.

This is getting really, really strange.

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You leftists are to funny. Facts have been discovered that will be investigated. Only a small minded leftist like you believes there is nothing to investigate here. You would think leftists like you would understand the misuse and abuse of power. Of course as long it is in the leftists favor, you turn you head like all good sheep do.

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

She took the 5th. Who does that in a world of political stunts?

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You’re saying “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t”.

I disagree.

The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact.

Tom's a deep thinker.

(03-04-2014 06:16 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You’re saying “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t”.

I disagree.

The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact.

1. I never said anything of the sort.
2. I've admitted that what the IRS did was wrong.

I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner. She's going to take the 5th again. It's a waste of time and money. Issa should probably make that his next campaign slogan.

(03-04-2014 06:16 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: [ -> ]Tom's a deep thinker.

Fine. What's your excuse?

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:16 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You’re saying “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t”.

I disagree.

The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact.

1. I never said anything of the sort.
2. I've admitted that what the IRS did was wrong.

I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner. She's going to take the 5th again. It's a waste of time and money. Issa should probably make that his next campaign slogan.

So, your position is that if there appears to be smoke there and the investigative target refuses to co-operate, JUST DROP IT?

Do I have that correct? If not, why not spell it out. What is your position? Would it be the same if the roles were reversed (IRS targeted liberal groups)?

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]1. I never said anything of the sort.

I think "wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt" correlates pretty closely to “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t.”

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner.

OK, makes sense

(03-04-2014 06:40 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]1. I never said anything of the sort.

I think "wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt" correlates pretty closely to “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t.”

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner.

OK, makes sense

By calling her back...yes...that's another Issa stunt.

(03-04-2014 06:39 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:16 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You’re saying “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t”.

I disagree.

The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact.

1. I never said anything of the sort.
2. I've admitted that what the IRS did was wrong.

I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner. She's going to take the 5th again. It's a waste of time and money. Issa should probably make that his next campaign slogan.

So, your position is that if there appears to be smoke there and the investigative target refuses to co-operate, JUST DROP IT?

Do I have that correct? If not, why not spell it out. What is your position? Would it be the same if the roles were reversed (IRS targeted liberal groups)?

Well, if you'd actually stop trying to be a smart-ass all the time and read something you would know that Lerner wants a deal in exchange for her testimony. If she doesn't get one she will continue to exercise her Constitutional rights granted in the 5th Amendment...as any sane person in her situation would do. Sorry if that doesn't fit your agenda.

Again, I'm only talking about Lerner here.

Now, while I personally feel that they've found all they're going to find...as all the other investigations have already concluded...Issa can keep doing whatever he wants. But just remember how much it's costing us and how ineffective it continues to make him look.

If there's not a smidgen of corruption, why does Lerner want a deal for her testimony?

Oooohhhhh, another winner. If this keeps up I'll be broke. Good thing Churchs is having a sale.

(03-04-2014 06:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:39 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:34 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:16 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-04-2014 06:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]She's gotten death threats.

Her attorney has provided them to Issa.

They have done so before, and have said they will again if called, plead the 5th Amendment.

Issa is once again wasting your money and time for nothing but a political stunt. You must be proud of him and his failures.

You’re saying “nothing to see here, move along – you’re idiots if you don’t”.

I disagree.

The IRS targeted conservative and tea party groups requesting tax-exempt status in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election. That’s a fact.

1. I never said anything of the sort.
2. I've admitted that what the IRS did was wrong.

I'm only commenting on the situation here for Lerner. She's going to take the 5th again. It's a waste of time and money. Issa should probably make that his next campaign slogan.

So, your position is that if there appears to be smoke there and the investigative target refuses to co-operate, JUST DROP IT?

Do I have that correct? If not, why not spell it out. What is your position? Would it be the same if the roles were reversed (IRS targeted liberal groups)?

Well, if you'd actually stop trying to be a smart-ass all the time and read something you would know that Lerner wants a deal in exchange for her testimony. If she doesn't get one she will continue to exercise her Constitutional rights granted in the 5th Amendment...as any sane person in her situation would do. Sorry if that doesn't fit your agenda.

Again, I'm only talking about Lerner here.

Now, while I personally feel that they've found all they're going to find...as all the other investigations have already concluded...Issa can keep doing whatever he wants. But just remember how much it's costing us and how ineffective it continues to make him look.

How much is it costing us? More than one of Obama's vacations?