This time from zerOcare.

State House is looking at it's options to see what avenues they may have to opt out and kill this abomination at the State level.

Would be even more interesting if other States were to join in. Can an individual State be forced to participate? Hmmmm, how? Tanks and guns?

http://www.wltx.com/news/article/254934/...e-Care-Act

Seems only fair that if Obama can exempt his friends then the rest of us should be able to exempt ourselves as well.

South. South Carolina.

Dunno how to edit a title...

(12-10-2013 04:06 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  South. South Carolina.

Dunno how to edit a title...

Go to the original post, hit full edit. Should be able to there.

Ah did that once, but didn't see it there. Thanks.

South Carolina.....too small for a country, too large for an insane asylum.

I'll fire the first shot at Fort Sumter.

South Carolina was wrong in 1861. They're right in 2013.

(12-10-2013 05:12 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll fire the first shot at Fort Sumter.

South Carolina was wrong in 1861. They're right in 2013.

Wrong, as in tired of being told what to do by an entity that doesn't have the official power to do so?

I'll disagree, on the basis that 1861 is the identical situation as today.

LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

You have a warped view of reality. There are so many things wrong with your post, I don't know where to begin.

The GOP understands that all Americans are better off with a smaller federal government ... the rich, the poor, the middle class would all do better if the government was reduced by 50%.

Pious asses? It sounds like you suffer from Christophobia.

What Christ stood for? I think Christ advocated individuals taking care of the poor. I don't recall him demanding high taxes and a Roman welfare state.

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Great returns of what? What returns are they seeing?

If it 's such a rousing success, tell us the "truth" here.

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Where is the money coming form Djon? They expanded Medicaid. So what? More people on the public dole. If that is what you consider a "great return"? Ok. I hope you are ready to pay this bill that the ACA is racking up. It seems people really do thing money grows on trees.

(12-10-2013 06:51 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

You have a warped view of reality. There are so many things wrong with your post, I don't know where to begin.

The GOP understands that all Americans are better off with a smaller federal government ... the rich, the poor, the middle class would all do better if the government was reduced by 50%.

Pious asses? It sounds like you suffer from Christophobia.

What Christ stood for? I think Christ advocated individuals taking care of the poor. I don't recall him demanding high taxes and a Roman welfare state.

+1

(12-10-2013 07:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Great returns of what? What returns are they seeing?

If it 's such a rousing success, tell us the "truth" here.

Well, you COULD look it up. They have been having good success getting people signed up-of course, a good portion are signing up for the expanded Medicaid. Not surprising given that it is a right-to-work-for-less state.

(12-10-2013 10:12 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Where is the money coming form Djon? They expanded Medicaid. So what? More people on the public dole. If that is what you consider a "great return"? Ok. I hope you are ready to pay this bill that the ACA is racking up. It seems people really do thing money grows on trees.

If it were up to you you, you would just let them die in the streets and spit on their dead bodies calling them worthless pieces of ****.

(12-11-2013 12:55 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 07:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Great returns of what? What returns are they seeing?

If it 's such a rousing success, tell us the "truth" here.

Well, you COULD look it up. They have been having good success getting people signed up-of course, a good portion are signing up for the expanded Medicaid. Not surprising given that it is a right-to-work-for-less state.

Look up what, moron?

A further expansion of the welfare state? It may surprise you, except I'm guessing you're barely lucid, that I've read the White Paper on this so called "success".

Have you? Well, of course not. Simply because A. You wouldn't know what a white paper is. And B. You clearly can't read or comprehend, well, much of anything.

Tell you what, you and djackoff find me this rousing success and we'll make some kind of wager. Otherwise, you two clowns please STFU.

K? Thx.

(12-11-2013 12:57 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 10:12 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Where is the money coming form Djon? They expanded Medicaid. So what? More people on the public dole. If that is what you consider a "great return"? Ok. I hope you are ready to pay this bill that the ACA is racking up. It seems people really do thing money grows on trees.

If it were up to you you, you would just let them die in the streets and spit on their dead bodies calling them worthless pieces of ****.

I would not spit on anyone. That would be rude.

(12-11-2013 01:32 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-11-2013 12:55 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 07:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Great returns of what? What returns are they seeing?

If it 's such a rousing success, tell us the "truth" here.

Well, you COULD look it up. They have been having good success getting people signed up-of course, a good portion are signing up for the expanded Medicaid. Not surprising given that it is a right-to-work-for-less state.

Look up what, moron?

A further expansion of the welfare state? It may surprise you, except I'm guessing you're barely lucid, that I've read the White Paper on this so called "success".

Have you? Well, of course not. Simply because A. You wouldn't know what a white paper is. And B. You clearly can't read or comprehend, well, much of anything.

Tell you what, you and djackoff find me this rousing success and we'll make some kind of wager. Otherwise, you two clowns please STFU.

K? Thx.

Oh. Sorry Mr. Drunk. I forgot you are in the "spit on the dead people on the street and say you are glad they are dead because they were just worthless pieces of ****" camp. Maybe you and 'Fo should get together and have a circle jerk about the thought of dead bodies of these worthless "takers" in the streets.

(12-11-2013 06:50 AM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(12-11-2013 12:57 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 10:12 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(12-10-2013 06:20 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  LOL - states like Kentucky that have embraced ACA are seeing great returns.


But the GOP doesn't give a **** about anything other than the 1% - why should they care about the poor.


They will just be pious asses at church, while ignoring what Christ stood for.

Where is the money coming form Djon? They expanded Medicaid. So what? More people on the public dole. If that is what you consider a "great return"? Ok. I hope you are ready to pay this bill that the ACA is racking up. It seems people really do thing money grows on trees.

If it were up to you you, you would just let them die in the streets and spit on their dead bodies calling them worthless pieces of ****.

I would not spit on anyone. That would be rude.

Bull ****. That is EXACTLY what you would do. You are a selfish and heartless human being.

Hope they do kill it off and remove all the Obamacare mandates so I can go back to paying 1/3 of what I am now for better benefits.