(12-01-2013 06:39 PM)CrazyCajun Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 06:32 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 06:20 PM)CrazyCajun Wrote:  They were pulling for ULM last night, that is understandable. Cajun fans owe them no appology for pulling for WKU. Its okay for fans to pull for their program's best interest.

Yep. UL doesn't have to justify their reasoning. They get invited to bowls, they accept the one that best meets their own interests as they see them.

If we have an issue it is with the conference bowl selection/placement rules and not with what UL chooses to do within those rules. We would do no differently.

Hope you lose to USA and utterly destroy Tulane.

LOL!!! Well I hope you are wrong on the first....but I know USA will be licking their chops with UL starting a RS freshman at QB.

But no matter what happens we're not going to complain. We will play the hand we are dealt. It worked out for us the last two seasons.

(12-01-2013 06:43 PM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote:  But no matter what happens we're not going to complain. We will play the hand we are dealt. It worked out for us the last two seasons.

Wait a minute....your fans never complain after a loss?

(12-01-2013 06:48 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 06:43 PM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote:  But no matter what happens we're not going to complain. We will play the hand we are dealt. It worked out for us the last two seasons.

Wait a minute....your fans never complain after a loss?

I didn't see much complaining or looking to lay blame elsewhere last night after ULM beat us fair and square. Did you?

Having said that, there was another Belt game with a whole world of butt-hurt going on afterwards.

So much for ole' Karl doing his wheeling and dealing to get the conference in a better position for an extra spot. Screws MT out of Military last year when the offer was there for the taking and now stAte will likely have to sit after not getting the Cajuns to agree to Indy. Feel bad for the Belt.

(12-01-2013 07:08 PM)MTowho Wrote:  So much for ole' Karl doing his wheeling and dealing to get the conference in a better position for an extra spot. Screws MT out of Military last year when the offer was there for the taking and now stAte will likely have to sit after not getting the Cajuns to agree to Indy. Feel bad for the Belt.

It was mtsu that turned down the Military bowl early on bc the Liberty bowl was going to take the winner of the stAte v. mtsu game. You shoulda taken the invite.

(12-01-2013 07:02 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  I didn't see much complaining or looking to lay blame elsewhere last night after ULM beat us fair and square. Did you?

Having said that, there was another Belt game with a whole world of butt-hurt going on afterwards.

I haven't had time to look, but I would imagine most of the whining has been related to our game with WKU....as that seems to be the hot topic as of late.

But you can bet when you guys lose a game on some 'controversial calls', your fans will complain.
Seriously, we've listened to you guys complain for YEARS over a freaking name.

Butt-hurt? You sound like a Muts fan. I have no 'butt-hurt' as you imply, and feel free to check my recent posts. I've said nothing negative about our loss or ULL....on here or the den.

A loss is a loss. We've been there before, and we'll be there again. I have my own opinions on things that happened last night, but it really doesn't matter today.

(12-01-2013 07:16 PM)indianE Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 07:08 PM)MTowho Wrote:  So much for ole' Karl doing his wheeling and dealing to get the conference in a better position for an extra spot. Screws MT out of Military last year when the offer was there for the taking and now stAte will likely have to sit after not getting the Cajuns to agree to Indy. Feel bad for the Belt.

It was mtsu that turned down the Military bowl early on bc the Liberty bowl was going to take the winner of the stAte v. mtsu game. You shoulda taken the invite.

Conference office handles bowl negotiations. Look it up.

Don't want to make this about MT, but rather wanted to point out that Benson has done jack **** since taking over.

(12-01-2013 07:21 PM)Fanof49ASU Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 07:02 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  I didn't see much complaining or looking to lay blame elsewhere last night after ULM beat us fair and square. Did you?

Having said that, there was another Belt game with a whole world of butt-hurt going on afterwards.

Butt-hurt? You sound like a Muts fan. I have no 'butt-hurt' as you imply, and feel free to check my recent posts. I've said nothing negative about our loss or ULL....on here or the den.

A loss is a loss. We've been there before, and we'll be there again. I have my own opinions on things that happened last night, but it really doesn't matter today.

I wasn't singling you out for the butt-hurt comment, it was a general observation and an accurate one.

As for your closing statement, more fans should adopt your attitude.

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

So now we're clowns? I'm glad your true feelinigs have been exposed. I never did like all this support each other BS. We compete for the same conference championship and bowl games. I'm all for sportsmanship but I'm sick of all this brotherly love BS. I pull for whatever helps UL, period.

(12-02-2013 12:07 AM)WErLOUISIANA Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

So now we're clowns? I'm glad your true feelinigs have been exposed. I never did like all this support each other BS. We compete for the same conference championship and bowl games. I'm all for sportsmanship but I'm sick of all this brotherly love BS. I pull for whatever helps UL, period.

However you want it.

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

I guess ASU fans aren't as rational as they suggest when the shoe is on the other foot? I think some Cajun fans are tired of ASU fans complaining about last years NO Bowl invitation even after you guys won the championship. Exactly how long are we supposed to feel sorry for you when you are wearing the championship ring? Now once again, UL is the bad guy because we have chosen to attend the NO Bowl and ASU couldn't win 8 games this season. You guys have a good group of fans but this is just too damn ridiculous to even care about at this point.

(12-02-2013 12:09 AM)CrazyCajun Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

I guess ASU fans aren't as rational as they suggest when the shoe is on the other foot? I think some Cajun fans are tired of ASU fans complaining about last years NO Bowl invitation even after you guys won the championship. Exactly how long are we supposed to feel sorry for you when you are wearing the championship ring? Now once again, UL is the bad guy because we have chosen to attend the NO Bowl and ASU couldn't win 8 games this season. You guys have a good group of fans but this is just too damn ridiculous to even care about at this point.

You can check my posts. I have said over and over again that Laffy deserved whichever bowl they desired because they beat us head-to-head on our home field and that they didn't have to justify their choice to anyone. Look it up.

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

It amazes me how juvenile ASU fans have been acting on this board. Blaming the UL fans for your bowl predicament. Now you want to call us names fine do what you feel you must. Understand this we are all fans on this board none of us have any powers as to who will go bowling are who would stay home it all just our opinions. Please tell me what do you want us to do I'll drive to Ark and give you a shoulder to cry on because its sound like you need a friend. Threatening to leave the conference wow if it were that easy both of us would be leaving with WKU but its not. Suck it up, pull your boot laces tight and get ready for the next fight. If you want to blame someone other than ASU then blame Memphis they are the ones that stole a winnable game from you guys. All I'm saying is man up and move on. Also look at your current players fingers they have two championship rings my players have none we are thankful to get one this year. We might say we got two bowl rings but its not the same we all play to win the conference.

(12-02-2013 12:09 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 12:07 AM)WErLOUISIANA Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

So now we're clowns? I'm glad your true feelinigs have been exposed. I never did like all this support each other BS. We compete for the same conference championship and bowl games. I'm all for sportsmanship but I'm sick of all this brotherly love BS. I pull for whatever helps UL, period.

However you want it.

No one here gives a damn about what YOU think......you really think we should have pulled for stAte v. WKU when a stAte loss assures us a share???? You are completely off of your rocker.

We all cheer for what's best for our school. Wouldn't be a "fan" if we didn't.

This weekend I'll be cheering for UL since that is what's best for WKU. Nothing against USA. Records reversed I'd be cheering for USA.

(12-02-2013 06:21 AM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 12:09 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 12:07 AM)WErLOUISIANA Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

So now we're clowns? I'm glad your true feelinigs have been exposed. I never did like all this support each other BS. We compete for the same conference championship and bowl games. I'm all for sportsmanship but I'm sick of all this brotherly love BS. I pull for whatever helps UL, period.

However you want it.

No one here gives a damn about what YOU think......you really think we should have pulled for stAte v. WKU when a stAte loss assures us a share???? You are completely off of your rocker.

I don't think you should have pulled for stAte vs. WKU in the game. But I know you should have supported stAte over WKU for a bowl slot.

And yes, nobody gives a damn what I think. And that's why I don't give a damn what you want to be called anymore.

(12-02-2013 04:53 AM)CAJUNCOUNTRY Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:46 PM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 12:52 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  UL fans are supporting a defector because they don't want anyone in the conference sharing any glory with them this year....especially stAte. It's understandable in a short-term sense because they want a year to themselves. But it is sad for us based on the shared history. It's like your brother supporting the ex-wife during the divorce.

I've been supporting the Louisiana name, arguing that its good for the conference while UL fans have been trashing the SBC for a year and are now supporting the argument that fans with CUSA signatures lower in the conference standings should be preferred over us by our own conference.

I'm sitting here supporting UL's right to pick whatever bowl they want without worrying about us, yet UL fans support departing members over us?

Yeah, that makes me sad and unwelcome.

Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

It amazes me how juvenile ASU fans have been acting on this board. Blaming the UL fans for your bowl predicament.

I didn't blame UL fans for our bowl predicament. I blame UL fans for not returning the respect I've been giving their program.

(12-02-2013 08:45 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 06:21 AM)swampbear Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 12:09 AM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(12-02-2013 12:07 AM)WErLOUISIANA Wrote:  

(12-01-2013 11:50 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  Right. LOUISIANA-LAFAYETTE. LaLa. Laffy.

I'm done supporting you clowns on your naming thing if you aren't going to reciprocate the respect. I've done my last UL and Louisiana.

So now we're clowns? I'm glad your true feelinigs have been exposed. I never did like all this support each other BS. We compete for the same conference championship and bowl games. I'm all for sportsmanship but I'm sick of all this brotherly love BS. I pull for whatever helps UL, period.

However you want it.

No one here gives a damn about what YOU think......you really think we should have pulled for stAte v. WKU when a stAte loss assures us a share???? You are completely off of your rocker.

I don't think you should have pulled for stAte vs. WKU in the game. But I know you should have supported stAte over WKU for a bowl slot.

And yes, nobody gives a damn what I think. And that's why I don't give a damn what you want to be called anymore.

I don't care who gets what bowl slot...you want better...don't get skull drug on your own field on a Tuesday night.....we don't owe you 1 damn thing as fans.....