(10-23-2013 10:21 AM)Lee Moses Wrote:  

(10-23-2013 10:10 AM)AndreWhere Wrote:  

(10-22-2013 10:11 PM)PerryGreen Wrote:  Well said, we are new to this conference and haven't proven a thing yet. The D is pretty salty this year, and the stats would look better without the 600 yards we gave up to Georgia. But let's tap the brakes on the hyperbole a little bit.

Hyperbole is the lifeblood of UNT, though.

The "lifeblood"? Sounds a little hyperbolic, don't you think?

I also once said that "Super Glue is the lifeblood of robotics" and my boss set me straight on that pretty quickly. So maybe I'm exaggerating. But I will say that I've noticed a pattern of unsubstantiated claims coming from UNT fans

(10-23-2013 12:57 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  

(10-23-2013 10:21 AM)Lee Moses Wrote:  

(10-23-2013 10:10 AM)AndreWhere Wrote:  

(10-22-2013 10:11 PM)PerryGreen Wrote:  Well said, we are new to this conference and haven't proven a thing yet. The D is pretty salty this year, and the stats would look better without the 600 yards we gave up to Georgia. But let's tap the brakes on the hyperbole a little bit.

Hyperbole is the lifeblood of UNT, though.

The "lifeblood"? Sounds a little hyperbolic, don't you think?

I also once said that "Super Glue is the lifeblood of robotics" and my boss set me straight on that pretty quickly. So maybe I'm exaggerating. But I will say that I've noticed a pattern of unsubstantiated claims coming from UNT fans

gorilla tape is my 'lifeblood'....why spend all that money on toilet paper? ....the suction alone is worth the price of admission

(10-23-2013 10:21 AM)Lee Moses Wrote:  

(10-23-2013 10:10 AM)AndreWhere Wrote:  

(10-22-2013 10:11 PM)PerryGreen Wrote:  Well said, we are new to this conference and haven't proven a thing yet. The D is pretty salty this year, and the stats would look better without the 600 yards we gave up to Georgia. But let's tap the brakes on the hyperbole a little bit.

Hyperbole is the lifeblood of UNT, though.

The "lifeblood"? Sounds a little hyperbolic, don't you think?

The very usage of the word "lifeblood" and during the upcoming Halloween season? Not too wise, not too wise at all...

GMG!

PS: Conference USA needs USM back in their Top 25 form, though, and that is a fact.

I'd like to get to Top 100 first

(10-23-2013 03:42 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  I'd like to get to Top 100 first

You will. The nightmare will end.

(10-23-2013 06:10 AM)OUGwave Wrote:  I like UNT to cover in this one.

I actually do think their defense is one of the hardest hitting, most physical defenses that Tulane has played, not just this year, but over the past two.

Now, does that make them the best defense? No. But its not what I would want my true freshman quarterback with a weak OL facing. Let me put it this way, we started Nick Montana in the North Texas game. Its now three weeks later and Nick is still questionable.

I don't think USM has a prayer in this one, honestly.

Testify, brother.

(10-23-2013 06:10 AM)OUGwave Wrote:  I like UNT to cover in this one.

I actually do think their defense is one of the hardest hitting, most physical defenses that Tulane has played, not just this year, but over the past two.

Now, does that make them the best defense? No. But its not what I would want my true freshman quarterback with a weak OL facing. Let me put it this way, we started Nick Montana in the North Texas game. Its now three weeks later and Nick is still questionable.

I don't think USM has a prayer in this one, honestly.

tulane gobsmack. tulane, FFS. please, someone kill me . . . now.

If you guys let a handful of fans shape your entire opinion of UNT then that's your problem. Every fanbase has a few who make wild assumptions, that's just how it is.

I don't care what anyone says I remember the beat down of the 2004 New Orleans bowl and I am not taking this game lightly.

(10-24-2013 11:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(10-23-2013 06:10 AM)OUGwave Wrote:  I like UNT to cover in this one.

I actually do think their defense is one of the hardest hitting, most physical defenses that Tulane has played, not just this year, but over the past two.

Now, does that make them the best defense? No. But its not what I would want my true freshman quarterback with a weak OL facing. Let me put it this way, we started Nick Montana in the North Texas game. Its now three weeks later and Nick is still questionable.

I don't think USM has a prayer in this one, honestly.

tulane gobsmack. tulane, FFS. please, someone kill me . . . now.

meh...like sec smack when shula coached 'bama...well, maybe not to 'that' degree....yep, shoot me now

(10-24-2013 11:52 AM)ntmeangreen11 Wrote:  If you guys let a handful of fans shape your entire opinion of UNT then that's your problem. Every fanbase has a few who make wild assumptions, that's just how it is.

I don't care what anyone says I remember the beat down of the 2004 New Orleans bowl and I am not taking this game lightly.

I was at that game. that was the trip that I fell in love with The Staggeringly Drunk Bowl. I remember three things from that alcohol fueled rocket ride; michael boley returned an interception a really, really long ways for a TD, when the superdome people say there is no smoking in the arena, they really, really mean it, and unt has some really, really hot wimmins. never saw so many hot blondes wearing green before. ever.

the rest is a blur.