(10-09-2013 01:44 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:32 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  Its not too hard to see how angry the lefty trolls are today.

Its clear they are getting worried.

This just isn't working for Obama like he though it would.

Of course I am getting worried. I am worried how much longer I will keep my job once the tea baggers kill the world economy. Where I work now is really slow and if the world economy collapses, I will likely be out of a job. I believe that the tea bagger politicians know they are cornered and the only option they have left is to fight and that is a dangerous situation for the country to be in.

I would respond to this seriously, but what would be the point?

No one but here takes you seriously but other trolls.

Why not? Can't handle the truth? I work at a company that for the most part sells non-essential products for consumers(mainly from Japanese and Korean companies that are made in China). The world economy goes down, the company I work for at a minimum lays off a bunch of people at worst goes under. Either way, my job would be in jeopardy- and good luck finding a job in a crashed world economy.

What destroys the US and world economy is your psychotic believe that 17 trillion in debt is not a concern and we can just up that on up to 20 and 25 trillion more and more government spending on every aspect of american life.

You really are insane

You are confusing what the debt ceiling is and our current debt. No one wants our debt to get that high. NO ONE. But refusing to raise the debt ceiling will cause very serious issues for the US economy, and by extension, the US economy.

(10-09-2013 01:44 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:32 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  Its not too hard to see how angry the lefty trolls are today.

Its clear they are getting worried.

This just isn't working for Obama like he though it would.

Of course I am getting worried. I am worried how much longer I will keep my job once the tea baggers kill the world economy. Where I work now is really slow and if the world economy collapses, I will likely be out of a job. I believe that the tea bagger politicians know they are cornered and the only option they have left is to fight and that is a dangerous situation for the country to be in.

I would respond to this seriously, but what would be the point?

No one but here takes you seriously but other trolls.

Why not? Can't handle the truth? I work at a company that for the most part sells non-essential products for consumers(mainly from Japanese and Korean companies that are made in China). The world economy goes down, the company I work for at a minimum lays off a bunch of people at worst goes under. Either way, my job would be in jeopardy- and good luck finding a job in a crashed world economy.

What destroys the US and world economy is your psychotic believe that 17 trillion in debt is not a concern and we can just up that on up to 20 and 25 trillion more and more government spending on every aspect of american life.

You really are insane

I didn't say the 17 trillion in debt is not a concern. Nice try though.

(10-09-2013 01:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:32 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  Its not too hard to see how angry the lefty trolls are today.

Its clear they are getting worried.

This just isn't working for Obama like he though it would.

Of course I am getting worried. I am worried how much longer I will keep my job once the tea baggers kill the world economy. Where I work now is really slow and if the world economy collapses, I will likely be out of a job. I believe that the tea bagger politicians know they are cornered and the only option they have left is to fight and that is a dangerous situation for the country to be in.

I would respond to this seriously, but what would be the point?

No one but here takes you seriously but other trolls.

Why not? Can't handle the truth? I work at a company that for the most part sells non-essential products for consumers(mainly from Japanese and Korean companies that are made in China). The world economy goes down, the company I work for at a minimum lays off a bunch of people at worst goes under. Either way, my job would be in jeopardy- and good luck finding a job in a crashed world economy.

There is always food stamps. Obama looks after us all. Blessed be the Obama.

(10-09-2013 01:48 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:32 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  Its not too hard to see how angry the lefty trolls are today.

Its clear they are getting worried.

This just isn't working for Obama like he though it would.

Of course I am getting worried. I am worried how much longer I will keep my job once the tea baggers kill the world economy. Where I work now is really slow and if the world economy collapses, I will likely be out of a job. I believe that the tea bagger politicians know they are cornered and the only option they have left is to fight and that is a dangerous situation for the country to be in.

I would respond to this seriously, but what would be the point?

No one but here takes you seriously but other trolls.

Why not? Can't handle the truth? I work at a company that for the most part sells non-essential products for consumers(mainly from Japanese and Korean companies that are made in China). The world economy goes down, the company I work for at a minimum lays off a bunch of people at worst goes under. Either way, my job would be in jeopardy- and good luck finding a job in a crashed world economy.

There is always food stamps. Obama looks after us all. Blessed be the Obama.

You are a sad, little man. I hope you weren't always this way. Explains why you're alone now.

Who says I am alone?

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 12:55 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So what should Boenher be doing right now?

He's doing fine right now but his track record says he struggles in the 4th quarter.

That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

(10-09-2013 01:47 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:44 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:32 PM)Jedi Master Sipho-Dyas Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Of course I am getting worried. I am worried how much longer I will keep my job once the tea baggers kill the world economy. Where I work now is really slow and if the world economy collapses, I will likely be out of a job. I believe that the tea bagger politicians know they are cornered and the only option they have left is to fight and that is a dangerous situation for the country to be in.

I would respond to this seriously, but what would be the point?

No one but here takes you seriously but other trolls.

Why not? Can't handle the truth? I work at a company that for the most part sells non-essential products for consumers(mainly from Japanese and Korean companies that are made in China). The world economy goes down, the company I work for at a minimum lays off a bunch of people at worst goes under. Either way, my job would be in jeopardy- and good luck finding a job in a crashed world economy.

What destroys the US and world economy is your psychotic believe that 17 trillion in debt is not a concern and we can just up that on up to 20 and 25 trillion more and more government spending on every aspect of american life.

You really are insane

You are confusing what the debt ceiling is and our current debt. No one wants our debt to get that high. NO ONE. But refusing to raise the debt ceiling will cause very serious issues for the US economy, and by extension, the US economy.

It's concerning in that it continues to rise and there is no political will at all to curtail it.

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  He's doing fine right now but his track record says he struggles in the 4th quarter.

That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:02 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  He's doing fine right now but his track record says he struggles in the 4th quarter.

That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

Not jumping on any bandwagon my friend. I have been a conservative all my life and a registered Republican for 15 years. I also understand it is common sense. One of these two parties is going to come out on top regarding this standoff. There is no third option. Either the Democrats of the Republicans are going to come out on top after the 2014 midterms. One party has given us 17 trillion in debt, constant lies, Obamacare, amnesty for illegals, the erosion of the traditional family, and created a racial, gender and class divide in America. I'll give you a hint: It's not the GOP.

You better figure it out. Which kind of America do you want.

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

I voted against him twice. LOL!

I'm middle to 'left' in economic issues even though I believe wholeheartedly in the market economy and system. Greed isn't part of that equation though so I believe in some structure.

I'm middle to right in terms of social issues because I believe society as a collective unit does have SOME say in matters of marriage, abortion, etc.

That said, let me make those decisions here and you can make yours there as long as they comport with the minimum Federal requirements of the Constitution.

My personal opinion is that many of the problems we face today is due to the fact we have overburdened our Federal system and placed too much secondary authority on a system that was designed for far less.

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

The Democrat Party is too conservative for you?
Wow.

[quote='mathenis89' pid='9832884' dateline='1381344437']

Quote:You are confusing what the debt ceiling is and our current debt. No one wants our debt to get that high. NO ONE. But refusing to raise the debt ceiling will cause very serious issues for the US economy, and by extension, the US economy.

I agree the debt ceiling needs to be raised at this point in time; however, that is merely treating the sympton and not the disease. Eventually we will have to face the reason WHY the debt ceiling needs to be raised. Only after we do that will we start inching closer to resovling the debt issue.

(10-09-2013 02:01 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

Not jumping on any bandwagon my friend. I have been a conservative all my life and a registered Republican for 15 years. I also understand it is common sense. One of these two parties is going to come out on top regarding this standoff. There is no third option. Either the Democrats of the Republicans are going to come out on top after the 2014 midterms. One party has given us 17 trillion in debt, constant lies, Obamacare, amnesty for illegals, the erosion of the traditional family, and created a racial, gender and class divide in America. I'll give you a hint: It's not the GOP.

You better figure it out. Which kind of America do you want.

I'm well aware of the winner take all system man. The point is that picking the lesser of two evils doesn't benefit anybody in the long run. We pretty much all agree we dislike the system as a whole. The only thing preventing a change is the fear of losing the "game" you mentioned but politics is a football game with no clock my friend. Things will always change and from a macro-type view none of these changes either side want are all that dramatic.

BTW, the list you gave me is misleading, you may wish to reexamine just how all,of that came to be. In the blame game the guilty party is the one pointing the finger and right now I'm seeing two fingers and two parties. Meanwhile, I'm throwing up a finger as well and whistlin' Dixie.

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's why we need to rally behind him. We need to stop being naysayers. We need to be united.

That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

What you are is confused. Probably due to age.

(10-09-2013 02:03 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:35 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  That's naive man. He'll do what he wants to do.

I hope he sticks to his guns for one reason; it's time that the parties come back to the table and hash **** out instead of name call and grandstand. Other than that, Boehner, McCain, Reid, all cut from the same Maxi-pad as far as I'm concerned.

Like my Dad told me when I was a kid, "I'm not rich enough for the Republicans to care and I'm not poor enough for the Democrats."

I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

The Democrat Party is too conservative for you?
Wow.

There is no such thing as the "Democrat Party".

(10-09-2013 02:10 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 02:03 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

The Democrat Party is too conservative for you?
Wow.

There is no such thing as the "Democrat Party".

You're right, it's not right without the 'tic(k).'

(10-09-2013 02:10 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 02:03 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:56 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:54 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:41 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I'm going out on a limb here and say you are among the libertarian movement who still thinks it's productive to bash both sides....when one side is clearly giving you what you want. I directed you to an article that discusses just that in a previous thread.

We don't need that right now. What is naive is thinking a third party candidate can win an election with less than 3 percent of the electorate. It's also naive to think we still have time to window shop and bicker. Look at your alternative to the GOP.

Instead of continuing the nay saying, how about holding the Democrats accountable for creating the fiscal issue.....and forcing Obamacare on the populace.

Not at all in fact. I'm in no way a Libertarian.

Jumping on a bandwagon because you dislike one group and choosing the lesser of two evils aborts the entire system.

A Libertarian I can respect. How about that.

I agree with you wholeheartedly on the lesser of two evils issue. I voted for Obama in 2008, but did not vote in 2012, because neither candidate was worth a damn.

I'm not a Democrat. I'm registered as an independent and I dislike the Democratic Party. They're too conservative for me.

The Democrat Party is too conservative for you?
Wow.

There is no such thing as the "Democrat Party".

Have not considered them Democratic in years.

(10-09-2013 01:17 PM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-09-2013 01:14 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The individual mandate is all that gives this bill teeth. Without it the whole law is a suggestion.

Ever since the Single Payer option was forced out of the ACA by the Republican Party, I have been against the ACA. I am not happy with the fact I am REQUIRED to get healthcare. But hey, I'm not happy I HAVE sign up for selective service. It's a law, whether you like it or not.

I want Single Payer. Period.

You fellas are REAL good about enforcing his laws whether you like it or not. Telling us "it's the law whether we like it or not." Blah blah blah motherf*cker. If you're against it, it should be changed, if you're not, ITS THE LAW. Deal with it! Such a fine logic you crazy boyeeez have.

(10-09-2013 02:01 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  One party has given us 17 trillion in debt, constant lies, Obamacare, amnesty for illegals, the erosion of the traditional family, and created a racial, gender and class divide in America. I'll give you a hint: It's not the GOP.

You better figure it out. Which kind of America do you want.

Woah, you are lost there.

Both parties have overspent for decades... especially since Reagan became President.

Constant lies? Remember the WMDs in Iraq?

Traditional family erosion? You could argue Newt has been just as guilty as Clinton or any other Democrat.

(10-09-2013 02:07 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  BTW, the list you gave me is misleading, you may wish to reexamine just how all,of that came to be. In the blame game the guilty party is the one pointing the finger and right now I'm seeing two fingers and two parties. Meanwhile, I'm throwing up a finger as well and whistlin' Dixie.

Exactly true.