(07-09-2013 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: You and the Republicans lost this one too so they're just letting it slip quitely away, so you'd be wise to just let it go.
And as we know this is what it's all about with you. You don't care if anything wrong was done. You only care if your party "wins." Whatever that means.
Quote:I know you are incredulous to believing anything Mother Jones ever writes, but this piece sums it all up nicely.
Even Republicans Admit It: Politics Did Not Drive the IRS Tea Party "Scandal"
That piece sums up the lack of logic and stupidity you engage in daily. It's just as bad as the piece from the lefty site you posted an article from in another thread that I utterly destroyed and then you ignored from there. Never once having the guts to acknowledge it cause you're a hack.
Let's take a look.
Quote:From the New York Times we now learn that IRS employees who vetted applications for tax-exempt status heavily scrutinized a Palestinian rights group, open-source software developers, and an organization trying to help musicians make money online.
The fact the other groups received scrutiny could not be more irrelevant to the question of if tea party groups were unfairly targeted. And we know they were because the inspector has said they were. When you idiotically posted that because one liberal group got scrutiny that proved it wasn't political and I pointed out if police in town pulled over 1000 people in a month, 998 were minority and 2 were white it would be moronic to say that proves there was no bias involved. So the above liberal stupidity and lack of logic only sums up that, stupidity and lack of logic.
Quote:Then we learned that the manager of the IRS Screening Office in Cincinnati, where most of the alleged targeting took place, identified himself as a "conservative Republican." Still, Republicans forged onward.
I debunked this in an earlier thread using the guys specific testimony that you're too lazy to read. The above is meant to make you think the guy who identified himself as a conservative republican is who initiated that targeting and that's a lie based on his testimony and the Washington Post article you posted but either didn't read or were too stupid to understand.
Quote:"We haven't proved political motivation," said Representative Charles Boustany Jr., a Louisiana Republican who, as the chairman of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, is leading one inquiry.
This doesn't say there wasn't any. It's says they haven't proved it. They also haven't had testimony from Lois Lerner who took the fifth for the reason of, according to you liberals, because there was nothing to see here. People don't take the fifth if there's nothing to see here.
Quote:Senator Roy Blunt, Republican of Missouri, said that in retrospect, suggestions that Mr. Obama had orchestrated an IRS attack on his political enemies were unwarranted.
Obama not being involved doesn't mean this wasn't political. It doesn't mean there's "nothing to see here" as you claim. Only a hack would say it does, which is why you do.
The fact that liberal groups sailed through, weren't asked about their reading lists, weren't asked about their public prayers, weren't asked if anyone in their group planned to run for office in the future and hundreds of conservative groups were shows that politics played a part in this. The fact that software developers were also looked at doesn't disprove that. Only the diseased mind of a liberal hack would say it does.
I'm thrilled you have your lefty sites to tell you what to think. Lord knows you're not capable of thinking for yourself.
Hack.
/
What happened to the three major administration(phony) scandals?
![[Image: dog-biscuit.jpg]](http://images.yourdictionary.com/images/definitions/lg/dog-biscuit.jpg)
