(04-17-2013 05:07 PM)TTT Wrote: (04-17-2013 03:53 PM)stinkfist Wrote: (04-17-2013 03:50 PM)TTT Wrote: The guy said we got the cheapest, crappiest jerseys Nike offered.......he infers that Nike only makes one kind of jersey (which they clearly don't). I clearly pointed out that we are cheap, therefor we got the cheap jerseys Nike offered. I then said we should've gotten the better quality jersey's that Nike offers...the kind that a gazillion other teams don't have...similar to the ones Wyoming switched too. Wyoming used to have the same jerseys that we had...then they realized that they suck and everyone has them so they ante up'd and got better ones. Nike has crap uni's and they also have really good uni's so it's not like Nike makes a bad jersey. You get what you pay for when you get Nike jerseys.
Old Wyoming uni's (which were just like ours and a gazillion other teams)
New Wyoming uni's:
okay....now how does equate to winning games? ...as an aside but pertinent, I can't tell the difference and I don't watch the View.....
Dude, you seriously have vision and anger issues. How does the newer Nike uni's equate to winning? Let's see, they are tighter/stretch fit. What does that mean? Players aren't having to be distracted w/ pulling their jersery out from under their shoulder pads after every tackle (I can't tell you how many times I saw our players do this while trying to read signals from the sidelines from coaches). Also, the higher quality fabrics are more "breathable" and don't capture sweat as much. There are TONS of ways the newer Nike uni's help players PERFORM better. Having the tighter/stretch fit means players are less likely to get pulled down and tackled. In other words, they aren't LOOSE. Dude, there are a tons of reasons why Nike's higher quality uni's help players perform better than the lower quality uni's. Don't be a dick man.
He is not being one. Stinkfist is one of the nicest posters on here. He is asking you a legitimate question.
You are not entirely correct, though you are on the right track.
Basically, what Nike does is it introduces new technology, tests it on one or a few teams, then updates its templates from the higher end down to the lower end. Since Nike got the NFL deal, that has been their highest template. You saw the sweat panels first on a few teams, then almost every NFL team had them. Now, they are on the top template in Nike's college uniforms.
The 'sweatbox' panels do not work as you seem to think they do. What they do is capture a player's sweat, then hold it close to his body to help keep him cool, but also dry. They are considered a major innovation that may be worth an extra win every year if you play a lot of one-possession games. You can tell which uniforms have the Nike 'sweatbox' panels by simply looking at players late in a game:
The flip side for schools like Wyoming that negotiate with Nike to get the newer template jersey earlier is that Nike then either reduces their contract pay or forces them to wait longer before updating their jerseys again. That latter thing is usually not such a very big deal because most updates in uniform technology are minor and don't have the possibility of affecting the outcome of the game. A case in point is the "stretch" TTT referred to. What it is is a new fabric Nike introduced which has an outer layer that is more resistant to snagging and will not stretch as far as the old fabric. The fabric in the inner layer where it affects the snugness of the uniform is essentially unchanged. Unless Nike has changed the cut of the uniforms, the actual fit on the player should be the same between templates. The new template is just less likely to get pulled off the pads during a game.
FWIW, Nike would have eventually updated the templates for all its contract teams. It was a matter of patience.
I would rather have uniforms that the players can help design. Those look pretty good to me.
I am interested in what the military appreciation uniforms are going to look like.