(03-05-2013 06:43 PM)StillJonesing Wrote: (03-05-2013 06:23 PM)Big Dub Wrote: See you in few years.
Doubtful. For all that stuff ERC posted you are still the poorest school in CUSA and have one of the worst fanbases despite a good amount of success. The problem is no one cares, not even your own fans. This isn't about the past this is about the future and where programs will be in 10, 20, 30+ years.
When you bring up all these past accomplishment and your facility and support still look about the same as you did 25 years ago all it screams is you've maxed out and will never be anything more, and there are certainly no assurances you will even be what you were continuing to run on a shoestring budget in the future as money driven as athletics is becoming.
You were just 0-12 this year in football, maybe you think it was a fluke, so did Marshall for a long time when they dropped but it never really got back. I'd much rather align with schools with a higher level of commitment and resources and potential at this point. You guys failed to build any foundation that was anymore substantial than App State, which is your own fault and ERC I absoulutly wouldn't trade oru 50k fans for what we've built here moving forward for what you got.
1. Most of the schools coming in to CUSA have lower operating budgets than USM does. Those will get a nice bump from our conference money. USM itself is working on increasing its revenue, but I am not going to state anything here that I can't publicly verify.
2. You are going to have to quantify "one of the worst fanbases" because we just averaged 25,741 during an 0-12 season at a school with ~12,000 total undergraduates.
3. The lie in your "no one cares..." statement is the fact that you keep posting about it over and over and over...
4. Sure. Running off our past athletic director and university president and hiring new ones who are at least oriented toward change has nothing to do with our future.
5. I guess those end zone suites, baseball suites, locker room upgrades, and new scoreboards we have are just in the collective imaginations of USM fans.
6. When you only have nine losing seasons in your 96 season history, you tend to lean toward believing you will win more than you lose every season. But nothing in life is certain.
7. Since when did commitment equate only to money? You can carry this logical fallacy to an extreme. If Southern Miss has a 27-11 all time record against you in football, does that mean that ECU doesn't have enough commitment to football? Or maybe you are insinuating that money spent is more important than wins and losses on the field?
8. Potential is as much a measure of commitment as it is one of resources. See no. 7 above.
9. Please quantify the statement about nothing more substantial than Appalachian State. At the very least give me another shot out pointing out a logical fallacy.