Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
Author Message
Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,840
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 484
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #1
Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
Link to Zero Hedge story

"From Ron Paul

Government Security Is Just Another Kind Of Violence

The senseless and horrific killings last week in Newtown, Connecticut reminded us that a determined individual or group of individuals can cause great harm no matter what laws are in place. Connecticut already has restrictive gun laws relative to other states, including restrictions on fully automatic, so-called “assault” rifles and gun-free zones..."

Click the link to read the rest.
12-24-2012 11:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,463
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #2
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
Ron Paul = 01-wingedeagle
12-24-2012 11:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,840
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 484
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #3
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 11:01 AM)RobertN Wrote:  Ron Paul = 01-wingedeagle

Thank you for adding substance to the gun control debate
/sarc
12-24-2012 11:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,463
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #4
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 11:35 AM)Jugnaut Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 11:01 AM)RobertN Wrote:  Ron Paul = 01-wingedeagle

Thank you for adding substance to the gun control debate
/sarc
You are very welcome.
12-24-2012 12:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClairtonPanther Offline
people need to wake up
*

Posts: 25,250
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 803
I Root For: Pitt/Navy
Location: Portland, Oregon

Donators
Post: #5
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
Perhaps Obama should give up his right to have the Secret Service protecting his ass. He needs to practice what he preaches and put his $$$ where his mouth is. Just sayin
12-24-2012 12:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,936
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1562
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #6
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
You're an idiot. Just sayin
12-24-2012 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClairtonPanther Offline
people need to wake up
*

Posts: 25,250
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 803
I Root For: Pitt/Navy
Location: Portland, Oregon

Donators
Post: #7
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  You're an idiot. Just sayin

Thx for adding something worthwhile to the conversation. I take it you know very little about what the 2nd Amendment is really about.
12-24-2012 01:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,844
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #8
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  You're an idiot. Just sayin

Why's that? His suggestion follows logically. (Is that what bothers you?)
12-24-2012 01:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,847
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #9
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  You're an idiot. Just sayin

What's wrong with what he said? If a law will stop the violence then Obama has nothing to fear. If not, then why the laws?
12-24-2012 03:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,463
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #10
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 12:29 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  Perhaps Obama should give up his right to have the Secret Service protecting his ass. He needs to practice what he preaches and put his $$$ where his mouth is. Just sayin
03-lmfao Yeah, I think we know why you would like that.
12-24-2012 03:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,463
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #11
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 03:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  You're an idiot. Just sayin

What's wrong with what he said? If a law will stop the violence then Obama has nothing to fear. If not, then why the laws?
You are an idiot too. Nobody is saying it will stop the violence.
12-24-2012 03:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClairtonPanther Offline
people need to wake up
*

Posts: 25,250
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 803
I Root For: Pitt/Navy
Location: Portland, Oregon

Donators
Post: #12
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 03:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 12:29 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  Perhaps Obama should give up his right to have the Secret Service protecting his ass. He needs to practice what he preaches and put his $$$ where his mouth is. Just sayin
03-lmfao Yeah, I think we know why you would like that.

wow just wow
12-24-2012 03:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jugnaut Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,840
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 484
I Root For: UCF
Location: Florida
Post: #13
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 03:36 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 03:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 12:29 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  Perhaps Obama should give up his right to have the Secret Service protecting his ass. He needs to practice what he preaches and put his $$$ where his mouth is. Just sayin
03-lmfao Yeah, I think we know why you would like that.

wow just wow

Robert just made me think of this sketch lol:


12-24-2012 03:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UM2001GRAD Offline
Humble to a Fault
*

Posts: 8,967
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation: 141
I Root For: The Tea Party
Location: Blue State
Post: #14
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
The right-wing's best defense = their own abject stupidity ... Reality always wins out in the end, and the reality of this matter is that the nutwing gun advocates have lost. The percentage of gun owners in America has been steadily falling and is nearing a mere 1/3 of the country. The other 2/3 of Americans are tired of the nutwing protecting the right of would-be murderers to easily access any type of weapon they want with little to no controls. That's going to end. That's the reality of situation.
12-24-2012 04:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ClairtonPanther Offline
people need to wake up
*

Posts: 25,250
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 803
I Root For: Pitt/Navy
Location: Portland, Oregon

Donators
Post: #15
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 04:00 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  The right-wing's best defense = their own abject stupidity ... Reality always wins out in the end, and the reality of this matter is that the nutwing gun advocates have lost. The percentage of gun owners in America has been steadily falling and is nearing a mere 1/3 of the country. The other 2/3 of Americans are tired of the nutwing protecting the right of would-be murderers to easily access any type of weapon they want with little to no controls. That's going to end. That's the reality of situation.

If what I'm about to say makes me a "right wing nut job" so be it. The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is so the people can form militia's to fight back against a tyrannical government or against an invading country. The government is far too idiotic today to be tyrannical but who's to say the government won't become oppressive 2-3-4 generations from now. Stripping our seeds the ability to fight back against the government or against foreign invaders is shameful and down right stupid.

Criminals will always have guns. Do you think a Crip, Blood, MS13 or any other gang will just hand over their AR15's when they haven't giving up M16's yet? Come on yo.

What the reality of the situation needs to be is more effort geared towards finding out what causes mental illness and the best ways to treat mental illness. Its very obvious that we're no where near up to date here.

The NRA needs to stop blaming video games, music video's, and movies. Sh*t you didn't see someone kill 10+ after watching "The Godfather" or any Terminator movie.
12-24-2012 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,847
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #16
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 04:00 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  The right-wing's best defense = their own abject stupidity ... Reality always wins out in the end, and the reality of this matter is that the nutwing gun advocates have lost. The percentage of gun owners in America has been steadily falling and is nearing a mere 1/3 of the country. The other 2/3 of Americans are tired of the nutwing protecting the right of would-be murderers to easily access any type of weapon they want with little to no controls. That's going to end. That's the reality of situation.

You do know that one of the theories on why Japan didn't try to invade, and had no plans to invade the US mainland was due to the large number of weapons in civilian hands, right?
12-24-2012 04:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,463
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #17
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 04:19 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  
(12-24-2012 04:00 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  The right-wing's best defense = their own abject stupidity ... Reality always wins out in the end, and the reality of this matter is that the nutwing gun advocates have lost. The percentage of gun owners in America has been steadily falling and is nearing a mere 1/3 of the country. The other 2/3 of Americans are tired of the nutwing protecting the right of would-be murderers to easily access any type of weapon they want with little to no controls. That's going to end. That's the reality of situation.

You do know that one of the theories on why Japan didn't try to invade, and had no plans to invade the US mainland was due to the large number of weapons in civilian hands, right?
03-lmfao Where did you get that? I would LOVE to see a source for this.
12-24-2012 04:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,302
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #18
RE: Ron Paul weighs in on Sandy Hook/Gun Control
(12-24-2012 04:00 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote:  The right-wing's best defense = their own abject stupidity ... Reality always wins out in the end, and the reality of this matter is that the nutwing gun advocates have lost. The percentage of gun owners in America has been steadily falling and is nearing a mere 1/3 of the country. The other 2/3 of Americans are tired of the nutwing protecting the right of would-be murderers to easily access any type of weapon they want with little to no controls. That's going to end. That's the reality of situation.

Do you not understand that ANY gun law would just be a facade? All the controls someone puts in place only strengthens the black market. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be a more comprehensive database of people who were denied purchase, but banning ARs outright is only going to keep law abiding citizens from having ARs.
12-24-2012 04:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.