(12-19-2012 05:05 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-19-2012 01:03 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  If length of time were important you would never have voted for Obama. If military experience were important you never would have voted fit Obama. If business experience were important you never would have voted for Obama.

You are a supporter of the most unqualified, least accomplished man to ever sit in the Oval Office so clearly you don't even buy the argument you're making. As a result it's difficult for anyone else to.

I see what you just did. In politics, they call it a pivot. Turn the conversation from Tim Scott to Obama being unqualified. Last time that I checked Obama was over 35, not impeached by the senate nor led a rebellion against the US, has lived in the US for 14 years and is a natural-born citizen.......wait. LOL.

By your new criteria Scott is perfectly qualified. Once again proving your original troll...er...I mean point is something even you don't believe.

Thanks for playing.

(12-20-2012 07:42 AM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  

(12-19-2012 05:05 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-19-2012 01:03 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  If length of time were important you would never have voted for Obama. If military experience were important you never would have voted fit Obama. If business experience were important you never would have voted for Obama.

You are a supporter of the most unqualified, least accomplished man to ever sit in the Oval Office so clearly you don't even buy the argument you're making. As a result it's difficult for anyone else to.

I see what you just did. In politics, they call it a pivot. Turn the conversation from Tim Scott to Obama being unqualified. Last time that I checked Obama was over 35, not impeached by the senate nor led a rebellion against the US, has lived in the US for 14 years and is a natural-born citizen.......wait. LOL.

By your new criteria Scott is perfectly qualified. Once again proving your original troll...er...I mean point is something even you don't believe.

Thanks for playing.

I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

What injustice? You're absolutely f**king nuts. Or maybe just so angry that there's going to be an African-American republican in the senate that you have to resort to puerile crap like this.

There are exactly zero affirmative action issues here. If you knew anything about affirmative action you would understand that.

(12-20-2012 09:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

What injustice? You're absolutely f**king nuts. Or maybe just so angry that there's going to be an African-American republican in the senate that you have to resort to puerile crap like this.

There are exactly zero affirmative action issues here. If you knew anything about affirmative action you would understand that.

Regardless Obama was elected to his position, not appointed like Scott is. So the Affirmative action question is valid.

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 07:42 AM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  

(12-19-2012 05:05 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-19-2012 01:03 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  If length of time were important you would never have voted for Obama. If military experience were important you never would have voted fit Obama. If business experience were important you never would have voted for Obama.

You are a supporter of the most unqualified, least accomplished man to ever sit in the Oval Office so clearly you don't even buy the argument you're making. As a result it's difficult for anyone else to.

I see what you just did. In politics, they call it a pivot. Turn the conversation from Tim Scott to Obama being unqualified. Last time that I checked Obama was over 35, not impeached by the senate nor led a rebellion against the US, has lived in the US for 14 years and is a natural-born citizen.......wait. LOL.

By your new criteria Scott is perfectly qualified. Once again proving your original troll...er...I mean point is something even you don't believe.

Thanks for playing.

I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

"You lie!"

(12-21-2012 01:28 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 09:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

What injustice? You're absolutely f**king nuts. Or maybe just so angry that there's going to be an African-American republican in the senate that you have to resort to puerile crap like this.

There are exactly zero affirmative action issues here. If you knew anything about affirmative action you would understand that.

Regardless Obama was elected to his position, not appointed like Scott is. So the Affirmative action question is valid.

Pathetic... Dems accusing those racist R's of employing affirmative action...

Damn one gets off the plantation and you libs flip out..

(12-21-2012 01:28 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 09:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

What injustice? You're absolutely f**king nuts. Or maybe just so angry that there's going to be an African-American republican in the senate that you have to resort to puerile crap like this.
There are exactly zero affirmative action issues here. If you knew anything about affirmative action you would understand that.

Regardless Obama was elected to his position, not appointed like Scott is. So the Affirmative action question is valid.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

You're obviously both 1) clueless and 2) trolling.

(12-21-2012 02:12 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(12-21-2012 01:28 AM)dcCid Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 09:04 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-20-2012 08:52 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  I never wrote that he wasn't qualified. He's over 30, a US citizen for the past nine years, and an inhabitant of SC. However, what about the significantly more-qualified white man (Joe Wilson) who was passed over for a promotion for a less-qualified minority? It's like you don't care. Who will speak out for the injustice? Firm bizzle that's who. :muttering:

What injustice? You're absolutely f**king nuts. Or maybe just so angry that there's going to be an African-American republican in the senate that you have to resort to puerile crap like this.

There are exactly zero affirmative action issues here. If you knew anything about affirmative action you would understand that.

Regardless Obama was elected to his position, not appointed like Scott is. So the Affirmative action question is valid.

Pathetic... Dems accusing those racist R's of employing affirmative action...

Damn one gets off the plantation and you libs flip out..

Great use of slavery reference to make your point (sarcasm)which has nothing to do with the affirmative action question.

He probably likes RGIII too...

(12-21-2012 09:40 PM)RaiderATO Wrote:  He probably likes RGIII too...

Another example of a good white man (Kirk Cousins)that lost his position to a less qualified black man.

(12-22-2012 11:34 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-21-2012 09:40 PM)RaiderATO Wrote:  He probably likes RGIII too...

Another example of a good white man (Kirk Cousins)that lost his position to a less qualified cornball brother.

Fixed it for ya.

(12-22-2012 12:48 PM)RaiderATO Wrote:  

(12-22-2012 11:34 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-21-2012 09:40 PM)RaiderATO Wrote:  He probably likes RGIII too...

Another example of a good white man (Kirk Cousins)that lost his position to a less qualified cornball brother.

Fixed it for ya.

As a redskins fan I am just happy we won!