(11-02-2012 09:39 AM)bronconick Wrote:  Not seeing it. The MAC has teams #3, 5, 6, and 7 in the Harris poll for non-BCS teams. That means they need to pass 1 and 2 (Boise State and Louisiana Tech) and pass Nebraska on their way to #16 minimum.

All it takes is for Boise and LT to lose. We won't pass them otherwise. And we don't need to finish ahead of Nebraska - we need to finish ahead of the Little 10 or Big Least Champion.

(11-02-2012 09:39 AM)bronconick Wrote:  Not seeing it. The MAC has teams #3, 5, 6, and 7 in the Harris poll for non-BCS teams. That means they need to pass 1 and 2 (Boise State and Louisiana Tech) and pass Nebraska on their way to #16 minimum.

The good thing is that one of those teams is likely going to defeat two of those other three teams. While the fourth will be defeated by one of the other two.

That one team is going to get a big bump if all four don't lose to anyone but those other 3 teams.. LT should not be a problem to pass but for the rest to happen we need several miracles.

(11-02-2012 10:13 AM)MidnightBlueGold Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 09:39 AM)bronconick Wrote:  Not seeing it. The MAC has teams #3, 5, 6, and 7 in the Harris poll for non-BCS teams. That means they need to pass 1 and 2 (Boise State and Louisiana Tech) and pass Nebraska on their way to #16 minimum.

All it takes is for Boise and LT to lose. We won't pass them otherwise. And we don't need to finish ahead of Nebraska - we need to finish ahead of the Little 10 or Big Least Champion.

Nebraska's the highest ranked Big Ten team of the week, thus I was penciling them in as the Big Ten champ until they lose this weekend and get replaced by #23 Wisconsin or whatever.

(11-02-2012 11:48 AM)bronconick Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 10:13 AM)MidnightBlueGold Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 09:39 AM)bronconick Wrote:  Not seeing it. The MAC has teams #3, 5, 6, and 7 in the Harris poll for non-BCS teams. That means they need to pass 1 and 2 (Boise State and Louisiana Tech) and pass Nebraska on their way to #16 minimum.

All it takes is for Boise and LT to lose. We won't pass them otherwise. And we don't need to finish ahead of Nebraska - we need to finish ahead of the Little 10 or Big Least Champion.

Nebraska's the highest ranked Big Ten team of the week, thus I was penciling them in as the Big Ten champ until they lose this weekend and get replaced by #23 Wisconsin or whatever.

Or they can lose the Little 10 Championship game...

So kicking a school from an athletic conference is the equivalent of the extermination of humans according to MAC fans. Good thing I'm not calling for the removal of all the directional or city schools, or I might be labeled Hitler himself.

The fact that an average high school football attendance is considered a "non factor" is incredibly embarrassing.

I thought the Temple posters were flaming idiots. I still do, but I am now seeing their points that MAC fans standards are embarrassingly low. Akron is underperforming. EMU is not underperforming, they are doing what I expect them to do. Nothing.

But what do i know, i am just some Nazi with a vengence against a school with a huge potential. I am only saying this because my team is good right now. You guys will show me when we only have 2000 fans at our basketball scrimmage tomorrow.

(11-02-2012 08:55 AM)EA3 Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:52 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:01 AM)The Optimist Wrote:  PS. LK has a +25 rating. Very credible system.

He's our very own crazy old aunt in the attic.

She has a positive rating because

1. She posts regularly and despite the garbage, she manages to post plenty of interesting subject lines and adds to the conversation.

2. She adds to the conversation by talking up Ohio (so exhausting sometimes). But I'd rather have her talk up Ohio, than attack others.

3. She visits plenty of other boards that do not find her quite as annoying.

4. The ratings go back years when she wasn't as big of a pest.

(11-02-2012 12:03 PM)The Optimist Wrote:  So kicking a school from an athletic conference is the equivalent of the extermination of humans according to MAC fans. Good thing I'm not calling for the removal of all the directional or city schools, or I might be labeled Hitler himself.

The fact that an average high school football attendance is considered a "non factor" is incredibly embarrassing.

I thought the Temple posters were flaming idiots. I still do, but I am now seeing their points that MAC fans standards are embarrassingly low. Akron is underperforming. EMU is not underperforming, they are doing what I expect them to do. Nothing.

But what do i know, i am just some Nazi with a vengence against a school with a huge potential. I am only saying this because my team is good right now. You guys will show me when we only have 2000 fans at our basketball scrimmage tomorrow.

(11-02-2012 12:26 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:55 AM)EA3 Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:52 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:01 AM)The Optimist Wrote:  PS. LK has a +25 rating. Very credible system.

He's our very own crazy old aunt in the attic.

She has a positive rating because

1. She posts regularly and despite the garbage, she manages to post plenty of interesting subject lines and adds to the conversation.

2. She adds to the conversation by talking up Ohio (so exhausting sometimes). But I'd rather have her talk up Ohio, than attack others.

3. She visits plenty of other boards that do not find her quite as annoying.

4. The ratings go back years when she wasn't as big of a pest.

What's with all the misogyny here? I know there are actually some die hard and intelligent female fans who post here all the time. Just because you find a poster obnoxious and stupid and annoying, calling him a "her" is insulting....
to women.

(11-02-2012 01:13 PM)axeme Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 12:26 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:55 AM)EA3 Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:52 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:01 AM)The Optimist Wrote:  PS. LK has a +25 rating. Very credible system.

He's our very own crazy old aunt in the attic.

She has a positive rating because

1. She posts regularly and despite the garbage, she manages to post plenty of interesting subject lines and adds to the conversation.

2. She adds to the conversation by talking up Ohio (so exhausting sometimes). But I'd rather have her talk up Ohio, than attack others.

3. She visits plenty of other boards that do not find her quite as annoying.

4. The ratings go back years when she wasn't as big of a pest.

What's with all the misogyny here? I know there are actually some die hard and intelligent female fans who post here all the time. Just because you find a poster obnoxious and stupid and annoying, calling him a "her" is insulting....
to women.

I'm not trying to insult anyone. I think LK is a female. No joke...

And I do sincerely apologize if I offended anyone.

You'd not only be Hitler-esque, you'd be dismissing the conference's flagship football program :)

GO HUSKIES!

(11-02-2012 12:03 PM)The Optimist Wrote:  So kicking a school from an athletic conference is the equivalent of the extermination of humans according to MAC fans. Good thing I'm not calling for the removal of all the directional or city schools, or I might be labeled Hitler himself.

The fact that an average high school football attendance is considered a "non factor" is incredibly embarrassing.

I thought the Temple posters were flaming idiots. I still do, but I am now seeing their points that MAC fans standards are embarrassingly low. Akron is underperforming. EMU is not underperforming, they are doing what I expect them to do. Nothing.

But what do i know, i am just some Nazi with a vengence against a school with a huge potential. I am only saying this because my team is good right now. You guys will show me when we only have 2000 fans at our basketball scrimmage tomorrow.

(11-02-2012 01:13 PM)axeme Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 12:26 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:55 AM)EA3 Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:52 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-02-2012 08:01 AM)The Optimist Wrote:  PS. LK has a +25 rating. Very credible system.

He's our very own crazy old aunt in the attic.

She has a positive rating because

1. She posts regularly and despite the garbage, she manages to post plenty of interesting subject lines and adds to the conversation.

2. She adds to the conversation by talking up Ohio (so exhausting sometimes). But I'd rather have her talk up Ohio, than attack others.

3. She visits plenty of other boards that do not find her quite as annoying.

4. The ratings go back years when she wasn't as big of a pest.

What's with all the misogyny here? I know there are actually some die hard and intelligent female fans who post here all the time. Just because you find a poster obnoxious and stupid and annoying, calling him a "her" is insulting....
to women.

I thought it was b/c LK got compared to a crazy aunt.

I think it is because of the roots for 'high fashion' near his/her avatar.