RE: KSU vs. Akron
The way to shoot a better percentage at the line is, obviously, to recruit better free throw shooters. BUT,would those hypothetical recruits be better players? Kent State is not Duke, or North Carolina, or Kansas, or Kentucky, etc. when it comes to recruiting. The coaches have to recruit the best players available [b]that fit in with their program. What I mean by available is, for example, the Sullinger brothers. Kent State would have loved to have had all three, but only the middle one, the undersized one, was available to a Kent State. So, a mid-major, even a Kent State, is only going to get players, with RARE exceptions, that have flaws in their game. Sometimes that flaw is free throw shooting. I'm confident that free throw shooting, as is every other phase of the game, is coached well. But it is like everything else in life. Some can do it consistently well, and others just can't, no matter how hard they try.
I'm disappointed in the loss, obviously, especially since it was Akron,but only slightly disappointed, as this team met or exceeded what any of us could have reasonably expected at the start of the season, and even more so after it became obvious that Johnson and Nealy, two players they were counting on, were unable to contribute.
|