emu steve
Legend
Posts: 39,610
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 86
I Root For: EMU / MAC
Location: DMV - D.C. area
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
I agree with you, C'Prof.
I would rather the MAC not send any team less then 7 - 5, maybe 8 wins (there could be a lot of 8 win MAC teams).
|
|
11-19-2010 02:25 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Purdue loses (barely) to MSU, and IU is losing to Penn State. That's two more teams that won't get to bowl eligibility. Virginia lost to BC (after outplaying them) 17-13 to fall to 4-7 so they are out as well.
|
|
11-20-2010 03:25 PM |
|
houstonhuskie
All American
Posts: 3,766
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 15
I Root For: NIU
Location: houston, texas
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
i disagree...i would love to see a 6-6 WMU team in a bowl...i think they are dangerous and would represent us well
|
|
11-20-2010 03:31 PM |
|
houstonhuskie
All American
Posts: 3,766
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 15
I Root For: NIU
Location: houston, texas
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
WMU fans should start becoming Duke fans right now....a good chance to put in jeopardy another BCS school....if GTech loses to Duke today, they probebly will not get by Georgia next week and will be sitting out the bowl season
|
|
11-20-2010 03:43 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Troy got hammered today to fall to 5-5.....will the Sunbelt have more than 1 or 2 bowl eligible teams when all is "said and done"?
|
|
11-20-2010 03:44 PM |
|
houstonhuskie
All American
Posts: 3,766
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 15
I Root For: NIU
Location: houston, texas
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
North Texas is winning early against ULM.....That would be GREAT if NT can knock ULM out of the bowl picture
|
|
11-20-2010 03:46 PM |
|
Rocket A
Heisman
Posts: 6,023
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: 'Nati
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
(11-20-2010 03:25 PM)exCincy Kid Wrote: Purdue loses (barely) to MSU, and IU is losing to Penn State. That's two more teams that won't get to bowl eligibility. Virginia lost to BC (after outplaying them) 17-13 to fall to 4-7 so they are out as well.
UVA was already eliminated from bowl contention before this game, 2 of their wins were against FCS teams, you can only count one of them toward bowl eligibility. Could have used the Cavaliers knocking off BC, who has now become bowl eligible.
|
|
11-20-2010 03:47 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
If Marshall (4-6) beats SMU (5-5) today both of these teams could end up bowl eligible. SMU was leading early but it's a close game.
|
|
11-20-2010 03:50 PM |
|
niubrad00
Boss
Posts: 8,048
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: -13
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
(11-20-2010 03:47 PM)Rocket A Wrote: (11-20-2010 03:25 PM)exCincy Kid Wrote: Purdue loses (barely) to MSU, and IU is losing to Penn State. That's two more teams that won't get to bowl eligibility. Virginia lost to BC (after outplaying them) 17-13 to fall to 4-7 so they are out as well.
UVA was already eliminated from bowl contention before this game, 2 of their wins were against FCS teams, you can only count one of them toward bowl eligibility. Could have used the Cavaliers knocking off BC, who has now become bowl eligible.
Maybe. Word is if there's not enough eligible teams to fill all the bowl slots, the first thing they'll do is give a waiver to teams with 2 FCS wins if they're 6-6. Arizona State could fall in that category too.
|
|
11-20-2010 03:54 PM |
|
MileHighBronco
Legend
Posts: 34,345
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 1732
I Root For: Broncos
Location: Forgotten Time Zone
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
(11-20-2010 03:31 PM)houstonhuskie Wrote: i disagree...i would love to see a 6-6 WMU team in a bowl...i think they are dangerous and would represent us well
I'm glad at least one person sees this. I'm torn, thinking that a 6-6 team going to a bowl is a reward for mediocrity. WMU is perhaps the most dangerous mediocre team in this league. Despite being decimated by injuries, they are holding up their end of the deal so far today.
In principle, I'm against any 6-6 team going to a bowl but I would watch (not go) if my team somehow got in by winning out to go 6-6.
The difference between a 6-6 MAC team vs a 6-6 BCS team is that most BCS teams play all their OOC games at home, leaving themselves needing only 2 or 3 wins in their league to get to bowl eligibility. A MAC team often plays at least 2 of those OOC games on the road - (@MSU, @ Notre Dame for WMU this year). If WMU gets to 6-6, they will end up 5-3 in MAC play, not under .500 in league play like a BCS team.
|
|
11-20-2010 03:58 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Some strange doin's in C-USA as a pretty good ECU team (6-4) is losing badly to 2-8 Rice 55-31 early in the 4th qtr. SMU is now up 21-zip on the Herdlers, & UCF up 14-zip on Tulane ((4-6).
|
|
11-20-2010 03:58 PM |
|
Rocket A
Heisman
Posts: 6,023
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 6
I Root For: Toledo Rockets
Location: 'Nati
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
(11-20-2010 03:54 PM)niubrad00 Wrote: (11-20-2010 03:47 PM)Rocket A Wrote: (11-20-2010 03:25 PM)exCincy Kid Wrote: Purdue loses (barely) to MSU, and IU is losing to Penn State. That's two more teams that won't get to bowl eligibility. Virginia lost to BC (after outplaying them) 17-13 to fall to 4-7 so they are out as well.
UVA was already eliminated from bowl contention before this game, 2 of their wins were against FCS teams, you can only count one of them toward bowl eligibility. Could have used the Cavaliers knocking off BC, who has now become bowl eligible.
Maybe. Word is if there's not enough eligible teams to fill all the bowl slots, the first thing they'll do is give a waiver to teams with 2 FCS wins if they're 6-6. Arizona State could fall in that category too.
Fine and good, but that should not jeopardize any MAC school with 6+ wins with only 1 win coming against FCS schools.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2010 04:00 PM by Rocket A.)
|
|
11-20-2010 03:59 PM |
|
NIU05
Heisman
Posts: 8,703
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 40
I Root For: TRUTH
Location: Eternity
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
I heard a pitch being made for Wisc for at large spot....11-1 ability to sell tickets and travel..
|
|
11-20-2010 04:02 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Louisville lost to WVU to fall to 5-6, but has a beatable Rutgers left on their schedule. G-Tech now up on Duke, 23-13. Ark State (4-6) down 14-zip to Navy.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2010 04:06 PM by exCincy Kid.)
|
|
11-20-2010 04:03 PM |
|
houstonhuskie
All American
Posts: 3,766
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 15
I Root For: NIU
Location: houston, texas
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
duke within a fg...(if they hadnt thrown a pick 6 15 yards away from a td they would be owning Gtech) and NT again ahead of ULM....
|
|
11-20-2010 04:07 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Colorado (4-6) coming on strong and beating K-State today so far, but they have to play Nebraska next. La-Monroe now on the board and down 13-7 to N. Texas State. If L-Monroe wins today, they will likely be bowl eligible 'cause their last game is against La-Lafayette (2-8).
|
|
11-20-2010 04:13 PM |
|
exCincy Kid
All American
Posts: 4,918
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
SMU blowing out Marshall so far...24-zip at half. Not looking good for the Herd to become bowl eligible.
|
|
11-20-2010 04:19 PM |
|
conrock
1st String
Posts: 1,412
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: -1
I Root For: winners
Location:
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
(11-20-2010 03:58 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: (11-20-2010 03:31 PM)houstonhuskie Wrote: i disagree...i would love to see a 6-6 WMU team in a bowl...i think they are dangerous and would represent us well
I'm glad at least one person sees this. I'm torn, thinking that a 6-6 team going to a bowl is a reward for mediocrity. WMU is perhaps the most dangerous mediocre team in this league. Despite being decimated by injuries, they are holding up their end of the deal so far today.
In principle, I'm against any 6-6 team going to a bowl but I would watch (not go) if my team somehow got in by winning out to go 6-6.
The difference between a 6-6 MAC team vs a 6-6 BCS team is that most BCS teams play all their OOC games at home, leaving themselves needing only 2 or 3 wins in their league to get to bowl eligibility. A MAC team often plays at least 2 of those OOC games on the road - (@MSU, @ Notre Dame for WMU this year). If WMU gets to 6-6, they will end up 5-3 in MAC play, not under .500 in league play like a BCS team.
If they get to 6 they were as close to one could be to have gotten 8 @CMU and NIU was a mess to lose. They deserve it.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2010 05:04 PM by conrock.)
|
|
11-20-2010 04:25 PM |
|
MileHighBronco
Legend
Posts: 34,345
Joined: Mar 2005
Reputation: 1732
I Root For: Broncos
Location: Forgotten Time Zone
|
RE: Bowl contingencies and MAC at-large bids
Glad to see that we made the list.
|
|
11-20-2010 04:54 PM |
|