(05-23-2009 12:14 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-23-2009 10:50 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  McC wasn't my cup of tea but I believe the man to be morally just and highly ethical. He certainly wouldn't gone on a spending spree that closely rivaled my wife.

I would not take bets on that. Maybe less...but...still bad.

Take bets on what? That he'd wouldn't rival what my wife spends or what Obama spends...

(05-23-2009 11:54 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(05-21-2009 01:33 PM)GGniner Wrote:  one difference, Carter always came across as a do-gooder Douche bag. He never would've beat Ford if the nation wasn't pissed at Ford for pardoning Nixon, and in general pissed at Republicans at the time.

Obama is in sync with the culture and like Clinton can come off as 'cool' so to speak. Which makes him more dangerous.

Yet, look at the Vote in California the other day. Every single county in California voted against the Liberals on all the Props. A majority of the nation is now "Pro-Life" and of course the Tea Parties.

What planet do you actually live on? Is there a planet Faux?

Roberta, what he said is true, just because you choose to ignore it makes your entire way of thinking a faux pas.

McCain was a budget hawk in the Senate, no Pork request from him either. To think he would've allowed 1.8 Trillion Defecit, with 8,000 Pork request in a "Stimulus Bill" is a serious reach. He may have had to veto it a couple times, force the Dem CONGRESS to pull much of their pork out but the Deficit would be much smaller than it currently is.

instead we got Obama with a liberal congress to hand out money like candy, doing a complete 180 and showing just how phony they were for Bush's fractional spending compared to this

Is it any wonder why the states won by Obama voted for him?

(05-23-2009 12:21 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(05-23-2009 12:14 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(05-23-2009 10:50 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  McC wasn't my cup of tea but I believe the man to be morally just and highly ethical. He certainly wouldn't gone on a spending spree that closely rivaled my wife.

I would not take bets on that. Maybe less...but...still bad.

Take bets on what? That he'd wouldn't rival what my wife spends or what Obama spends...

:lmfao.....OK....To quote Larry the cable guy..."I don't care who you are...that's funny".

Well at least you are still married to her...imagine the divorced spending.

(05-23-2009 01:35 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Is it any wonder why the states won by Obama voted for him?

I'm thinking, in your state, the byers remorse has set in and would have voted McCain if given a mulligan.

would Calif EC vote been enough to give McCain the whitehouse?