the other Greg Childers Wrote:TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:the point was that the Dem's wouldn't allow it -even had he wanted to - and then WANTED TO KNOW WHY HE DIDN'T FINISH THE JOB WHEN HE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY. THAT was my point. obviously it went over your head.
Stay on topic Shirley, even those this thread has gotten so far off topic as to be unrecognizable.
I'm done with this one
You're making this up. At least try to stay in the realm of reality.
Then:
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." (27 September 2002)
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." (27 September 2002)
Now:
"There was no imminent threat. This was made up in Texas, announced in January to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud."
" It's now clear that from the very moment President Bush took office, Iraq was his highest priority as unfinished business from the first Bush Administration. His agenda was clear: find a rationale to get rid of Saddam."
"We cannot simply speak out against an escalation of troops in Iraq, we must act to prevent it...There can be no doubt that the Constitution gives Congress the authority to decide whether to fund military action, and Congress can demand a justification from the president for such action before it appropriates the funds to carry it out."
Remarks to the National Press Club (9 January 2007), as quoted in "Official: First wave of troops to Iraq by Jan. 30" at MSNBC (9 January 2007)
From the poster boy of responsibility, Ted Kennedy.