T-Monay820 Wrote:Do you understand what happened in Vietnam? From what you just said, you are claiming communism is better than democracy. From what you just said, you're telling us that you seriously think that it was all southern Veitnamese who were against us.
Do you have flash cards in order to memorize the doctrine? Or are you just a frustrated history major?
Might I suggest Howard Zinn's _A People's History of the United States_? Or perhaps _Necessary Illusions_ by Noam Chomsky?
In any event, it's quite evident that we started the Vietnam War by invading a country who did not want our help. It's a long and sordid tale and I frankly don't have the time to instruct you in your glaring holes of memory lapse but it's all their for your perusal at:
<a href='http://monkeyfist.com/ChomskyArchive/essays' target='_blank'>http://monkeyfist.com/ChomskyArchive/essays</a>
Here's a bit:
The Responsibility of Intellectuals
February 23, 1967
The New York Review of Books
"The Responsibility of Intellectuals"
by Noam Chomsky
Twenty-two years ago, Dwight MacDonald published a series of articles in Politics on the responsibility of peoples and, specifically, the responsibility of intellectuals. I read them as an undergraduate, in the years just after the war, and had occasion to read them again a few months ago. They seem to me to have lost none of their power or persuasiveness. MacDonald is concerned with the question of war guilt. He asks the question: To what extent were the German or Japanese people responsible for the atrocities committed by their governments? And, quite properly, he turns the question back to us: To what extent are the British or American people responsible for the vicious terror bombings of civilians, perfected as a technique of warfare by the Western democracies and reaching their culmination in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, surely among the most unspeakable crimes in history. To an undergraduate in 1945-46 -- to anyone whose political and moral consciousness had been formed by the horrors of the 1930s, by the war in Ethiopia, the Russian purge, the "China Incident," the Spanish Civil War, the Nazi atrocities, the Western reaction to these events and, in part, complicity in them -- these questions had particular significance and poignancy.
With respect to the responsibility of intellectuals, there are still other, equally disturbing questions. Intellectuals are in a position to expose the lies of governments, to analyze actions according to their causes and motives and often hidden intentions. In the Western world, at least, they have the power that comes from political liberty, from access to information and freedom of expression. For a privileged minority, Western democracy provides the leisure, the facilities, and the training to seek the truth lying hidden behind the veil of distortion and misrepresentation, ideology and class interest, through which the events of current history are presented to us. The responsibilities of intellectuals, then, are much deeper than what MacDonald calls the "responsibility of people," given the unique privileges that intellectuals enjoy.
The issues that MacDonald raised are as pertinent today as they were twenty years ago. We can hardly avoid asking ourselves to what extent the American people bear responsibility for the savage American assault on a largely helpless rural population in Vietnam, still another atrocity in what Asians see as the "Vasco da Gama era" of world history. As for those of us who stood by in silence and apathy as this catastrophe slowly took shape over the past dozen years -- on what page of history do we find our proper place? Only the most insensible can escape these questions. I want to return to them, later on, after a few scattered remarks about the responsibility of intellectuals and how, in practice, they go about meeting this responsibility in the mid-1960s.
