Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

I didn’t read deeper, but I am willing to bet that your report classifies the disgraceful Jan. 6 riots as right-wing terrorism but not the much worse BLM mayhem.

You are smart enough to know better, Mr. X. Sadly, you are too ideologically marinated in leftist propaganda to ever admit it.

Horse man it looks like you just got owned. Not a good week for you is it bud.

It’s never a good week for him.

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

Of course you trash the source, a well respect source, because you can’t defend your ludicrous position that is based on feels and not data.

(10-24-2026 05:53 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  I didn’t read deeper, but I am willing to bet that your report classifies the disgraceful Jan. 6 riots as right-wing terrorism but not the much worse BLM mayhem.

You are smart enough to know better, Mr. X. Sadly, you are too ideologically marinated in leftist propaganda to ever admit it.

With every post you keep proving my point that you are projecting. I can call out the left errors while you keep whining like a child that is always the other side’s fault. Grip a grip.

(10-24-2026 07:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

Of course you trash the source, a well respect source, because you can’t defend your ludicrous position that is based on feels and not data.

Thomas Pritzker, once the chairman of the CSIS, kept in regular contact with Epstein since the latter's 2008 plea deal on sex crimes charges and has been listed as a co-conspirator by Thomas Massie just last month. Also, Virginia Giuffre named him in a deposition as being related to her being trafficked through Epstein's network as well as someone who sexually abused her. Boom. Credibility shot. But I'll keep going.

CEO Gen. Joseph Dunford was nominated by Obama to be the Joint Chiefs of Staff during his presidency. (In fairness, Trump also nominated him and he was approved.)

The other two, no longer living, seemed like good men. So... there's that.

Leslie Abrahams is in charge of the Energy Security and... Climate Change program. Her top area of expertise is listed as... Climate Change. lol Derp.

So... A credible source? lolno

He’s not very bright

(10-24-2026 06:55 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  We disagree with them and we disagree with each other, while they are only allowed to disagree with us. It’s frustrating to them therefore we must die. How’s that for early morning logic.

I do agree that Tiger1983 is a wise man.

As do I.

(10-24-2026 10:41 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  There's a really noticeable difference between the common person on the right and the common person on the left bill. Please understand what I mean by "common", ie not political activists for either side. Most of the common people on the right just want to be left alone to live their life and raise their families.

Most of the common people on the left want to stir chit all the time with anyone they can corner into listening to them. I can name names from this very forum if you wish.

Speaking of wise men...

(10-24-2026 10:48 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 10:41 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  There's a really noticeable difference between the common person on the right and the common person on the left bill. Please understand what I mean by "common", ie not political activists for either side. Most of the common people on the right just want to be left alone to live their life and raise their families.

Most of the common people on the left want to stir chit all the time with anyone they can corner into listening to them. I can name names from this very forum if you wish.

And they cover their car with their bumper sticker and their yards with their hypocritical signs (talking about hate as if someone other than themselves are filled with hate and talking about science as if they actually even understand it).

bullet's on a roll.

(10-24-2026 01:32 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  A decade ago the SPLC was paying KKK leaders to attend the Unite The Right Rally. When an organization like the SPLC has to pay for violence on the Right, that’s likely a sign it isn’t common.

Since 1970 there have been over 1,000 acts of far left violence in comparison there have been 250 acts of far right violence.

While most violent political on the left is by organizations, violence on the right are usually lone wolf type violence.

Since the 70’s violence on the right has been less often but steady over the years. Violence on the left however started with a bang in the 70’s with widespread bombings and disappeared until Obama created the protest culture. Far-left violence has surged since 2016.

Looking back at the 70’s Far Left attempts to overthrow our government seem to be cyclical. The difference this time is the Far Left is in Democrat Party.

Well said.

(10-24-2026 03:47 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 10:41 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  There's a really noticeable difference between the common person on the right and the common person on the left bill. Please understand what I mean by "common", ie not political activists for either side. Most of the common people on the right just want to be left alone to live their life and raise their families.

Most of the common people on the left want to stir chit all the time with anyone they can corner into listening to them. I can name names from this very forum if you wish.

I overlooked this post this morning, BTF.

I basically agree with you. But I would be more specific.

The average person on the left is more alternative/less mainstream, more "oddball" and more unconventional. These are people that lean toward jobs in creative and nonprofit fields (music, comedy, film, visual arts, graphic arts, zoos, parks, museums, fashion, literature, media, etc.). This is the group that, in a general sense, makes American society interesting.

The average person on the right is more conventional/stable. These folks tend to have more "normal" jobs and lifestyles. They also tend to be more patriotic, more family oriented and more religious. This is the group that, in a general sense, makes American society functional and safe.

Obviously, there are many exceptions to the rule.

I don't fully agree with you when you note "most of the common people on the left (i.e., the typical lefties) want to stir chit all the time."

However, politically biased lefties do, indeed, agitate (protests, marches, vandalism, etc.) much more so than politically biased rightwingers. That is a fair and valid point.

You left off that they are uncommonly violent during an outrageous number of the events you listed. And vandalism is someone painting a cartoon on a boxcar or some woke idiots defacing a statue or building. Killing people, setting buildings and cars on fire, endangering critical first responders, and terrorizing innocent people isn't vandalism.

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

Oh heck, nice catch AM. well done.

(10-24-2026 07:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

Of course you trash the source, a well respect source, because you can’t defend your ludicrous position that is based on feels and not data.

He just threw the data right in front of that ridiculous horse, and the fall darn near killed it and you both. Stop digging.

(10-24-2026 10:46 AM)bullet Wrote:  The left has the majority of the atheists and many of them (and some alleged Christians) worship progressive politics. That is their religion. Their political leaders are their Ayatollahs. Most of the people on the right have a life. It revolves around friends, family, faith and football!

Major party foul alert!

You forgot beer and bourbon.

Come to think of it, beer yes, I don’t know if I’ve, ever seen one of my many, many lefty friends (decade plus in food service, all levels) ever have a good glass of bourbon.

Unless it had a bunch of Coke or ginger beer sweet stuff so they could tolerate.

Hunh

(10-24-2026 07:33 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

Of course you trash the source, a well respect source, because you can’t defend your ludicrous position that is based on feels and not data.

I didn’t attack the source. They attacked themselves. My guess, Mr. X., is that you are tanq.-lite - - incapable of admitting error. But I’ll at least give you a chance:

—> Are 20 instances of Tesla dealership fire-bombings examples of left-leaning terrorism? Your “well-respected source" says no. Do you agree?

—> Are multiple attacks on Jews an example of leftist terrorism or just an understandable reaction to to the current Israeli/Palestinian conflict? Your “well-respected source” says it’s the latter. Do you agree?

—> Are the countless attacks on ICE officers and facilities an example of leftist terrorism, or simply people justifiably acting out to government provocation? Your “well-respected source” says the latter.

You say I am projecting. Yet I am perfectly willing to acknowledge disgraceful behavior on the right, such as the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Despite the embedded government provocateurs, it was a shameful display - - including not least by our president at the time. Yet it was very much an exception for conservatives. Violence by progressives has become the go-to tactic.

You ought to be ashamed, Mr. X. But as a tanq.-like ideological puppet, I know you are not. Faced with facts you will do one of two things: either deny the obvious or disappear.

(10-24-2026 05:49 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Great analysis, Mr. X. From the appendix of your cited report:

Quote:The definition of terrorism used here excludes the series of attacks against Tesla vehicles and facilities.

[Also excluded] were three high-profile terrorist attacks in the United States in the first half of 2025 motivated by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

[And also excluded were] political demonstrations against immigration and customs enforcement activity across the United States in 2025 also resulted in many violent encounters, namely between law enforcement and demonstrators.

You leftists are a complete joke. Just not a particularly funny one.

In other words, 99% of left wing violence is not counted at all.

Which we all knew was going to be the case the second a stat was posted.

(10-24-2026 04:07 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

Seeing Alvin Monroe Samples Jr. in this GIF ...

... gives me a tingling in my loins.

(10-24-2026 11:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 03:47 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-24-2026 10:41 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  There's a really noticeable difference between the common person on the right and the common person on the left bill. Please understand what I mean by "common", ie not political activists for either side. Most of the common people on the right just want to be left alone to live their life and raise their families.

Most of the common people on the left want to stir chit all the time with anyone they can corner into listening to them. I can name names from this very forum if you wish.

I overlooked this post this morning, BTF.

I basically agree with you. But I would be more specific.

The average person on the left is more alternative/less mainstream, more "oddball" and more unconventional. These are people that lean toward jobs in creative and nonprofit fields (music, comedy, film, visual arts, graphic arts, zoos, parks, museums, fashion, literature, media, etc.). This is the group that, in a general sense, makes American society interesting.

The average person on the right is more conventional/stable. These folks tend to have more "normal" jobs and lifestyles. They also tend to be more patriotic, more family oriented and more religious. This is the group that, in a general sense, makes American society functional and safe.

Obviously, there are many exceptions to the rule.

I don't fully agree with you when you note "most of the common people on the left (i.e., the typical lefties) want to stir chit all the time."

However, politically biased lefties do, indeed, agitate (protests, marches, vandalism, etc.) much more so than politically biased rightwingers. That is a fair and valid point.

You left off that they are uncommonly violent during an outrageous number of the events you listed. And vandalism is someone painting a cartoon on a boxcar or some woke idiots defacing a statue or building. Killing people, setting buildings and cars on fire, endangering critical first responders, and terrorizing innocent people isn't vandalism.

My fumble, TB4E. That was an oversight (not done intentionally). Good catch. I just edited by adding "violence."