Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
Author Message
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #1241
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
(08-19-2026 10:34 PM)glacier_dropsy Wrote:  Crazy upward movement for Moderna today. I haven't seen any of the data from the melanoma trial, so I won't make any comments other than the market reaction. Using the mRNA jab for cancer treatment seems less like a classical vaccine and more like inducing antigen production, which is still relatively novel. Definitely not gene therapy, not sure where people got that.

It's quite obvious. It's from those who want to plant skepticism on vaccines without facts but with fear mongering. People like rfkjr.
08-20-2026 06:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #1242
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
(08-18-2026 08:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(08-18-2026 07:44 AM)JRsec Wrote:  The COVID 19 vaccine was an mRNA vaccine. My wife was in a lab which experimented with those when the concept was novel. 100% of the test subjects (non-human) died in the experiments.

- What year was this?
- What was the experiment trying to accomplish...I mean was it trying to develop a vaccine for a known problem, virus, etc.? A assertive statement such as “100% of the animals died” is not meaningful without identifying which group died, why they died, whether death was spontaneous or scheduled euthanasia, what formulation was used, and whether there was an untreated control group. Additionally, death may not always equal causation from the mRNA. Also, A highly experimental dose or formulation might prove toxic, but that might concern that particular candidate, dose, or delivery system, not necessarily “mRNA” as a technology generally.
- Do you have any sources to support the outcomes?

Thanks.

mRNA was considered novel in the late 1980's and early 1990's per Copilot. And using it to develop vaccines was researched all through the 1990's to the early 2010's. The first human clinical trials began for rabies in 2013.

Bottom line, there's many factors at play here that we simply don't know, and we're several years out from billions of shots being administered worldwide with still no evidence of a pattern of deaths from the Covid shots.

05-bump
08-20-2026 07:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Freaking Lunatic
*

Posts: 60,888
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 1547
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #1243
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
(08-18-2026 08:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(08-18-2026 07:44 AM)JRsec Wrote:  The disease which was created by combining the viral strains found in Horseshoe bats and Pangolins (two creatures who never come into proximity of one another) was a man-made crisis for profit.

Source?

05-bump
08-20-2026 07:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 29,283
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 4900
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #1244
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah


Quote:JUST RELEASED: The official hearing record of Anthony Fauci’s “testimony” before my Committee—which ultimately led the Committee to hold him in contempt. Beginning on page 96: previously unreleased documents I entered into the permanent congressional record, like this one showing CIA funds were transferred to Fauci’s NIAID.”
ead them for yourself here:pic.twitter.com/zyqwPKY0Uo — Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) August 28, 2026

An undated interagency agreement obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation confirms that Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases worked directly with the CIA on sensitive research involving viruses and biological threats.

The eight-page agreement shows that the CIA’s Biological Technology Center initiated a collaboration with NIAID involving “forensic microbiology” research for the intelligence community.

According to the documents, the CIA planned to leverage existing civilian research programs at NIH to support intelligence-related biological research.

Unclassified NIH virus research would be used to “augment and complement” the CIA’s own research and development.

The CIA would even help Fauci’s agency obtain the pathogens needed for the research.

The arrangement also gave the spy agency control over what could be released publicly.

Although the resulting research was reportedly considered sensitive rather than classified, NIAID could not share the data without first receiving permission from the CIA.

In other words, Fauci’s supposedly civilian public-health institute was working alongside America’s premier spy agency on research involving dangerous biological agents, with the CIA controlling access to the findings.

The project reportedly sought to expand the government’s ability to conduct comparative forensic analyses of complete viruses rather than examining only individual genes.

This is not ancient history. It is the origin story of the same apparatus that later funded bat-coronavirus experiments in Wuhan, steered the intelligence community away from the lab-leak hypothesis, and produced the “Proximal Origin” paper that media and public-health officials treated as gospel.

Documents released this year by Sen. Rand Paul and then-DNI Tulsi Gabbard showed Fauci briefing CIA officials, feeding the IC a hand-picked list of NIAID-funded scientists, and denying under oath that he had discussed viral research with intelligence agencies.

The new CIA–NIAID agreement shows the relationship was baked in from the start.



[quote]
A November 2003 CIA memo titled “The Darker Bioweapons Future” describes the rationale for virologists becoming spies. The National Academy told the CIA that in order to detect biological weapons, intel agencies needed more assets in labs. Sniffing out biological weapons will require “a much closer — and perhaps qualitatively different — working relationship between the intelligence and biological sciences communities.” pic.twitter.com/ltMRYTqanz — Emily Kopp (@emilyakopp) August 28, 2026
[quote]

Fauci denied funding gain-of-function work in Wuhan. NIH later conceded EcoHealth violated grant terms. Fauci’s senior adviser David Morens deleted records and coordinated with Peter Daszak.

Biden issued a preemptive pardon covering Fauci back to 2014, the same year the key EcoHealth grant began. Now we see NIAID was already serving as cover and complement for CIA bioterror research two decades earlier.

The Biological Weapons Convention bans development of biological weapons. “Characterization” and “forensic” work on complete viruses, with CIA control of the data and CIA help acquiring the agents, is exactly the gray zone critics warned about when Cheney parked the program at Fauci’s institute.

Evil. Pure evil.
08-29-2026 01:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Offline
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 86,713
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 11976
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: Hell House
Post: #1245
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
^^^ GO, was there ever a doubt?!!!

forwarded to li'l bubba and the rest of the fam...

if they would only just let me swing that Adirondack one, two, a hundred more...
08-29-2026 03:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoodOwl Offline
The 1 Hoo Knocks
*

Posts: 29,283
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 4900
I Root For: New Horizons
Location: Planiverse
Post: #1246
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024

New research has emerged indicating that children who received the COVID-19 shot have experienced significantly higher rates of various health conditions, including increases in autism, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), neurodevelopmental disorders, special education needs, asthma, anxiety, and more.

The study, titled “Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024,” was published today on Zenodo, a free and open-access research repository managed by CERN and OpenAIRE.

Nicolas Hulscher, one of the authors of the study said, “We analyzed official U.S. government data from 21,990 children and found a consistent association between childhood COVID-19 vaccination and higher odds of autism, ADHD, anxiety, special-education use, and mental-health treatment.”

Data was sourced from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a leading provider of health information for the U.S. civilian population.

Specifically, the Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator at the McCullough Foundation said the findings revealed a 32 percent increase in autism diagnoses, a 33 percent rise in ADHD cases, and a 23 percent uptick in any neurodevelopmental disorders.

Furthermore, there was a 19 percent increase in the use of special education services, a 24 percent rise in asthma cases, and a 27 percent increase in anxiety disorders among vaccinated children.

The study also indicated a 57 percent increase in the use of mental health medications and a 60 percent rise in the need for mental health therapy.

“The autism association persisted across numerous adjustment strategies, strengthened with increasing dose count, and reached its largest estimate in some of the youngest multiply vaccinated children,” Hulscher noted. “Among ages five to seven, three or more COVID shots were associated with 154 percent higher adjusted odds of current autism.”

He emphasized the urgency of these findings, stating, “This is a safety signal that must not be ignored. Endangering the developing brain is a red line. COVID-19 “vaccination” of children should cease immediately.”
10-05-2026 01:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tiger1983 Offline
BBA
*

Posts: 41,544
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 2987
I Root For: Tigers - GTG!
Location: The enemy’s lair

DonatorsDonatorsDonators
Post: #1247
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
(10-05-2026 01:15 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024

New research has emerged indicating that children who received the COVID-19 shot have experienced significantly higher rates of various health conditions, including increases in autism, Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), neurodevelopmental disorders, special education needs, asthma, anxiety, and more.

The study, titled “Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024,” was published today on Zenodo, a free and open-access research repository managed by CERN and OpenAIRE.

Nicolas Hulscher, one of the authors of the study said, “We analyzed official U.S. government data from 21,990 children and found a consistent association between childhood COVID-19 vaccination and higher odds of autism, ADHD, anxiety, special-education use, and mental-health treatment.”

Data was sourced from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a leading provider of health information for the U.S. civilian population.

Specifically, the Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator at the McCullough Foundation said the findings revealed a 32 percent increase in autism diagnoses, a 33 percent rise in ADHD cases, and a 23 percent uptick in any neurodevelopmental disorders.

Furthermore, there was a 19 percent increase in the use of special education services, a 24 percent rise in asthma cases, and a 27 percent increase in anxiety disorders among vaccinated children.

The study also indicated a 57 percent increase in the use of mental health medications and a 60 percent rise in the need for mental health therapy.

“The autism association persisted across numerous adjustment strategies, strengthened with increasing dose count, and reached its largest estimate in some of the youngest multiply vaccinated children,” Hulscher noted. “Among ages five to seven, three or more COVID shots were associated with 154 percent higher adjusted odds of current autism.”

He emphasized the urgency of these findings, stating, “This is a safety signal that must not be ignored. Endangering the developing brain is a red line. COVID-19 “vaccination” of children should cease immediately.”

Children were at very little risk of serious illness in general and when healthy in particular from CV-19.

Children should have never been strongly encouraged to the point of coercion to inject a drug with emergency authorization when the known and unknown risks far exceeded the benefits and vaccinations now should cease unless proven beneficial on a case by case basis.

Children should have never been forced to wear masks.

Children should have never been compelled to isolate away from public schools when private schools held classes in person.

The Dems are mainly responsible for the catastrophic policies harming children and they must be held accountable if not in the court of law, then in the court of public opinion. Never again.
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2026 05:46 AM by Tiger1983.)
10-06-2026 05:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BartlettTigerFan Offline
Have gun Will travel
*

Posts: 47,622
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 6844
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Undetermined
Post: #1248
RE: um...about them 'vaccines'....yeah
No one will ever be held responsible.
10-06-2026 07:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.