Quote:

A North Carolina career criminal has been arrested after he filmed himself attacking and chasing women in two social media videos that he posted online. The attacks appeared to be random, with him punching one woman to the ground, and then chasing after another one.

Di-Quan Schafar Hunt was arrested on Thursday, with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department saying he will be charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon. One video, which was filmed on July 30, took place in the 400 block of East Boulevard in Charlotte, NC.

Hunt was talking about a "real issue" in a separate video that was filmed on July 21, where he was walking past a woman who was holding a "get well" balloon. “Nah, don’t wave to me,” Hunt yelled at the woman, going on to knock her to the ground. The 220-pound repeat criminal hovered over the woman, striking her face multiple times as she lay motionless on the ground, screaming the n-word at her.


“You still talking? You still talking?” Hunt yelled. “July 21st. Say Elijah. Elijah my son, Motherf*cker you playing," he yelled at the woman's face as she lay on the ground defenseless. He took her glasses, kicked the balloon, and then ran from the scene.

In another video, he was talking about McDonald's and charged at a woman before then chasing her around a car by the sidewalk. “You wanna run b*tch, you wanna run motherf*cker, huh? I betcha run again motherf*cker."


Police were shown the videos earlier this week, and Hunt was taken into custody on Thursday around 7:30 am, per the New York Post. He was transported to a medical facility for treatment, but officials did not say what for. After he is discharged, he will be brought to the Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office and charged.

Over the last 34 months, Hunt has been arrested at least 9 times. Those arrests include assault on a female, simple assault, and assault with a deadly weapon, and he is a well-known vagrant in the city of Charlotte.

Link


SHOCK: Man with 14 Prior Arrests Taken Into Custody After Livestreaming Himself Randomly Attacking White Women in Charlotte, North Carolina (VIDEO)

https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2085506462529237191

Why white people cross the street to keep from walking on the same sidewalk.

(08-07-2026 12:47 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Why white people cross the street to keep from walking on the same sidewalk.

These days even decent black folks are crossing the street.

Future democrat senator.

It's terrible on many levels (mainly for the woman attacked), but I feel bad for the decent and honorable black people who have to deal with this heinous behavior. It indirectly tarnishes them.

(08-07-2026 01:37 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Future democrat senator.

I have to admit I chuckled at this zinger.

2A

(08-07-2026 01:37 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Future democrat senator.

Well, he seems nice.

...and won't be considered a "hate crime".

Is anyone surprised?

(08-07-2026 02:35 PM)shere khan Wrote:  2A

Or maybe just move up to an official firing squad. That dude is not going to "get better."

Glad to see the City of Charlotte has gotten its act together since Iryna Zarutska was murdered last August.

Sub 80 coward

The “Queen City”.

Read: third world schithole” unless you’re in a gated, secured or miles in the exburbs.

This is what we get.

Why do we have to live like this?

We shouldn’t have to.


Vote accordingly

(10-08-2026 11:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  The “Queen City”.

Read: third world schithole” unless you’re in a gated, secured or miles in the exburbs.

This is what we get.

Why do we have to live like this?

We shouldn’t have to.


Vote accordingly

Politicians won't help these issues. They only help their bank accounts. all 535 of them suck balls.

So many things that could and should be said……

Somebody should have taken that mofo out, regardless.

(08-07-2026 03:02 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  ...and won't be considered a "hate crime".

If he attacked her simply because she is white ... that's a hate crime (IMO).

But he used the "N" word (apparently). So it's not clear if he hates white people.

He's mentally ill (or so it seems).

(10-09-2026 09:46 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(08-07-2026 03:02 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  ...and won't be considered a "hate crime".

If he attacked her simply because she is white ... that's a hate crime (IMO).

But he used the "N" word (apparently). So it's not clear if he hates white people.

He's mentally ill (or so it seems).

Well, IMO, mental disorders should not be a defense in any case. As a matter of fact, if you are mentally incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong and do wrong you are much more dangerous to society because you lack rehabilitative qualities.

Stopping institutionalization of crazies was a huge mistake.

(10-09-2026 11:49 AM)banker Wrote:  

(10-09-2026 09:46 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(08-07-2026 03:02 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  ...and won't be considered a "hate crime".

If he attacked her simply because she is white ... that's a hate crime (IMO).

But he used the "N" word (apparently). So it's not clear if he hates white people.

He's mentally ill (or so it seems).

Well, IMO, mental disorders should not be a defense in any case. As a matter of fact, if you are mentally incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong and do wrong you are much more dangerous to society because you lack rehabilitative qualities.

Stopping institutionalization of crazies was a huge mistake.

I'm not sure I fully agree with you but I do strongly feel your general point is valid.

Using mental illness as a defense for a crime is generally rather lame. There are lots of mentally ill people who are not violent, don't commit crimes, etc.

(10-09-2026 01:22 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-09-2026 11:49 AM)banker Wrote:  

(10-09-2026 09:46 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(08-07-2026 03:02 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  ...and won't be considered a "hate crime".

If he attacked her simply because she is white ... that's a hate crime (IMO).

But he used the "N" word (apparently). So it's not clear if he hates white people.

He's mentally ill (or so it seems).

Well, IMO, mental disorders should not be a defense in any case. As a matter of fact, if you are mentally incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong and do wrong you are much more dangerous to society because you lack rehabilitative qualities.

Stopping institutionalization of crazies was a huge mistake.

I'm not sure I fully agree with you but I do strongly feel your general point is valid.

Using mental illness as a defense for a crime is generally rather lame. There are lots of mentally ill people who are not violent, don't commit crimes, etc.

He was raised to be a violent, hateful person. That isn't mental illness. That is culture.