Once again, Trump has dementia and Biden is as sharp as a tack.

You can't make this s*** up and you can't hate the prog filth enough.

Retards.

(01-23-2026 10:44 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Retards.

And Reddit is the source of retardation.

It amazes me that after 10+ years of being told the sky is falling, these miserable people still believe everything they hear about Trump. My local news Facebook page has put up at least two posts about the 5 year-old used as "bait". That is supposed to be "The News". I don't even know how you could use a kid as bait to pick up his illegal dad. Of course, the article posted explains exactly what happened and has nothing to to with what the post title is, but the stupid don't read the article.

(01-23-2026 09:48 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  Something tells me you couldn't define Marxist, socialist, communist and about 80% of the words you use with some hardcore dictionary-ing.
Aren't you the guy who did not know that the CIA installed the Shah as dictator in Iran?

Doesn't matter the definition is. If your side can throw around the racist and nazi labels then we should be able to call you what you evidently aspire to be.
No that wasn't me. As usual you are wrong.

(01-23-2026 10:55 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  It amazes me that after 10+ years of being told the sky is falling, these miserable people still believe everything they hear about Trump. My local news Facebook page has put up at least two posts about the 5 year-old used as "bait". That is supposed to be "The News". I don't even know how you could use a kid as bait to pick up his illegal dad. Of course, the article posted explains exactly what happened and has nothing to to with what the post title is, but the stupid don't read the article.

Well they know that. They know how many people just read the headling, how many just read the first paragraph and how few get to the end. NY Times, back before I got too disgusted to read it, used to put ridiculously misleading headlines, followed by misleading first paragraphs and then often actually told the truth, which contradicted their headline, later in the story.

(01-23-2026 10:42 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 09:40 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  They told Dozy Don that he could base some troops there. HE thought he won! What a ******* moron.
Oh and the plan? In two weeks! And the dripping chin magats think he a genius.

Saw this coming from a mile away. Dementia Donny loses in bid to takeover Greenland, Official Party Propaganda talking points pivots to this being the plan all along, something that could have been accomplished with one quiet phone call to Denmarks pm to great acclaim with our former allies. Idiots with zero critical thinking who in this very thread celebrated taking over Greenland now claiming victory. lol predictably sad.

You should read The Art of the Deal.

Actually learn something about... well something.... it wont help with your commie retardation but it will keep you from posting retarded posts like the one above.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

Well maybe it is a Guantanamo type deal.

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

I think he'd have loved to get ownership----but what he didnt have before was an infinite lease---and really---for all practical purposes---thats not much different than ownership. One need only look at the Panama Canal and the current situation on Diego Garcia to see there is a difference. An written infinite lease is better than an open ended lease. One can be ended at any time by the owner---the other cannot.

(01-23-2026 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

Well maybe it is a Guantanamo type deal.

Spokesperson for Denmark said today that there will be NO autonomy, not even for small pieces of land.

(01-23-2026 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

I think he'd have loved to get ownership----but what he didnt have before was an infinite lease---and really---for all practical purposes---thats not much different than ownership. One need only look at the Panama Canal and the current situation on Diego Garcia to see there is a difference. An written infinite lease is better than an open ended lease. One can be ended at any time by the owner---the other cannot.

The 1951 Treaty is an infinite lease, IIRC.

(01-23-2026 04:39 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

I think he'd have loved to get ownership----but what he didnt have before was an infinite lease---and really---for all practical purposes---thats not much different than ownership. One need only look at the Panama Canal and the current situation on Diego Garcia to see there is a difference. An written infinite lease is better than an open ended lease. One can be ended at any time by the owner---the other cannot.

The 1951 Treaty is an infinite lease, IIRC.

I only skimmed it thus far, but---interestingly--it appears the right to use Greenland is revokable if NATO ever ceases to exist (Article XIV, item 2).

The text of the agreement can be found in the following link.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp

(01-23-2026 04:50 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 04:39 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 04:20 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

I think he'd have loved to get ownership----but what he didnt have before was an infinite lease---and really---for all practical purposes---thats not much different than ownership. One need only look at the Panama Canal and the current situation on Diego Garcia to see there is a difference. An written infinite lease is better than an open ended lease. One can be ended at any time by the owner---the other cannot.

The 1951 Treaty is an infinite lease, IIRC.

I only skimmed it thus far, but---interestingly--it appears the right to use Greenland is revokable if NATO ever ceases to exist (Article XIV, item 2).

The text of the agreement can be found in the following link.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/den001.asp

Yeah, I actually heard the NATO link last night, just slipped my mind. That wouldn't really work for Trump. No way he would risk the Golden Dome going to Greenland or Denmark.

(01-23-2026 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

Well maybe it is a Guantanamo type deal.

Psst...you know there's never going to actually be any new deal, right? The "in two weeks" trope gave that away.

If anything, the "deal" trump announces will be the exact same items we already have the ability to do, and he'll claim victory, and the idiot base of his will nod along catatonically.

(01-23-2026 04:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

Well maybe it is a Guantanamo type deal.

Psst...you know there's never going to actually be any new deal, right? The "in two weeks" trope gave that away.

If anything, the "deal" trump announces will be the exact same items we already have the ability to do, and he'll claim victory, and the idiot base of his will nod along catatonically.

Now that we know the 1951 Treaty is linked to the existence of NATO, then absolutely not.

(01-23-2026 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 01:54 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Actually, the Treaty of 1951 gives us everything we want. Unlimited access to build bases and mine REM.

I've been saying that for a few days. All the histrionics were unnecessary. That's why I think Trump's original idea to take ownership of Greenland was true.

He even said at Davos that "You can't defend a lease."

Well maybe it is a Guantanamo type deal.

We have a perpetual lease for Guantanamo. Stupid Cubans have never deposited the checks. We used to pay them in gold, and started paying them cash since 1934. $4085/year.

(01-23-2026 01:22 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 10:42 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-23-2026 09:40 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  They told Dozy Don that he could base some troops there. HE thought he won! What a ******* moron.
Oh and the plan? In two weeks! And the dripping chin magats think he a genius.

Saw this coming from a mile away. Dementia Donny loses in bid to takeover Greenland, Official Party Propaganda talking points pivots to this being the plan all along, something that could have been accomplished with one quiet phone call to Denmarks pm to great acclaim with our former allies. Idiots with zero critical thinking who in this very thread celebrated taking over Greenland now claiming victory. lol predictably sad.

You should read The Art of the Deal.

Actually learn something about... well something.... it wont help with your commie retardation but it will keep you from posting retarded posts like the one above.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

You look up pyrrhic victory and realize Dear Leader spent decades of political capital getting something he could have gotten with one phone call.

That’s only “winning” for people that bankrupt casinos. Trump screws up free lunches and you idiots cheer

Anyone see the image the White House, yes the ******* official White House account, released showing trump walking in Greenland with a penguin? ******* inept children do not know that penguins don't live in Greenland. Or anywhere close to Greenland. But it fits. Elect a clown, expect a circus.

(01-24-2026 09:59 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  Anyone see the image the White House, yes the ******* official White House account, released showing trump walking in Greenland with a penguin? ******* inept children do not know that penguins don't live in Greenland. Or anywhere close to Greenland. But it fits. Elect a clown, expect a circus.