Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

why he's just as brain damaged as you are. Please feel free to enumerate, i'm not 100% opposed to the idea if it made sense but I don't see any compelling reason that has been named yet.

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:55 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Greenland sits in the middle of a direct route between us and western Russia, and also provides another access point by China.

Both Russian and Chinese ships are reportedly all over Greenland at the moment. Greenland also has REM that both countries are attempting to mine.

No one is seriously talking about invading them. We have talks scheduled Friday about purchasing Greenland.

do you know we already have a base on Greenland and an agreement to keep it there in perpetuity. Also that base is the only deepwater port on this side of the Arctic and only has ~3% of the personnel that were there during the cold war, with ZERO restrictions on us resupplying to cold war levels.

Also, before Trump started breaking down our alliances for "reasons", is there any evidence we couldn't completely control RE out of greenland since there are already dozens of US affiliated miners operating around there.

Again, what is the need?

The need is secrecy. We need to deploy weapon systems that are not subject to inspection by other NATO countries. These systems must remain uncompromised or they simply won't work. It's a matter of being able to securely deploy what is needed without compromising what they are and how they work.

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

Or better yet, he can write a strongly-worded letter to whoever his Represenative and Senators are. (But he won't. He'll just call us "boomers" because it makes him feel "cool".)

(01-07-2026 02:06 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

why he's just as brain damaged as you are. Please feel free to enumerate, i'm not 100% opposed to the idea if it made sense but I don't see any compelling reason that has been named yet.

I gave you several reasons. You just didn't like them. Fortunately for us, you're not the president.

(01-07-2026 02:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

Or better yet, he can write a strongly-worded letter to whoever his Represenative and Senators are. (But he won't. He'll just call us "boomers" because it makes him feel "cool".)

Leftists aren't cool.

Never have been.

Never will be.

(01-07-2026 02:10 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:06 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

why he's just as brain damaged as you are. Please feel free to enumerate, i'm not 100% opposed to the idea if it made sense but I don't see any compelling reason that has been named yet.

I gave you several reasons. You just didn't like them. Fortunately for us, you're not the president.

Balls only regurgitates Democrat talking points. Anything besides that, he rejects it.

America first means promoting and protecting American interests above all else. Although forcing Greenlanders to live under the American flag is not an option, the Danes must act upon our security and natural resource concerns with serious intent and find an adequate solution.

(01-07-2026 02:13 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  America first means promoting and protecting American interests above all else. Although forcing Greenlanders to live under the American flag is not an option, the Danes must act upon our security and natural resource concerns with serious intent and find an adequate solution.

Well, if Greenlanders want to live under our flag, that's definitely their choice, too. That's why I hope they get a say on the matter. (And I think they are putting their two cents in as well.)

(01-07-2026 02:08 PM)Claw Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:55 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Greenland sits in the middle of a direct route between us and western Russia, and also provides another access point by China.

Both Russian and Chinese ships are reportedly all over Greenland at the moment. Greenland also has REM that both countries are attempting to mine.

No one is seriously talking about invading them. We have talks scheduled Friday about purchasing Greenland.

do you know we already have a base on Greenland and an agreement to keep it there in perpetuity. Also that base is the only deepwater port on this side of the Arctic and only has ~3% of the personnel that were there during the cold war, with ZERO restrictions on us resupplying to cold war levels.

Also, before Trump started breaking down our alliances for "reasons", is there any evidence we couldn't completely control RE out of greenland since there are already dozens of US affiliated miners operating around there.

Again, what is the need?

The need is secrecy. We need to deploy weapon systems that are not subject to inspection by other NATO countries. These systems must remain uncompromised or they simply won't work. It's a matter of being able to securely deploy what is needed without compromising what they are and how they work.

This makes more sense but I don’t really see any impediment to implementing trumps golden shower project or whatever you’re referring to.

(01-07-2026 02:14 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:13 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  America first means promoting and protecting American interests above all else. Although forcing Greenlanders to live under the American flag is not an option, the Danes must act upon our security and natural resource concerns with serious intent and find an adequate solution.

Well, if Greenlanders want to live under our flag, that's definitely their choice, too. That's why I hope they get a say on the matter. (And I think they are.)

Agree. The geopolitical high stakes struggle outcome could come down to the opinions of a majority of around 42,000 adults living in Greenland. I think we should give one million dollars to 23,000 of them as a "signing bonus". It would be worth it.

(01-07-2026 02:10 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:06 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:04 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ball boy, I could give you 50 more reasons why we should buy Greenland, and it wouldn't matter to you.

Write a letter to Senator Fetterman and explain your concerns.

why he's just as brain damaged as you are. Please feel free to enumerate, i'm not 100% opposed to the idea if it made sense but I don't see any compelling reason that has been named yet.

I gave you several reasons. You just didn't like them. Fortunately for us, you're not the president.

No I just told you why they weren’t valid. Then you replied you had 50 (unenumerated)

No, idiot, I did not say I had 50 more, I said if I gave you 50 more, it wouldn't matter.

See, this is your real problem. You're retarded.

(01-07-2026 02:22 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:14 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:13 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  America first means promoting and protecting American interests above all else. Although forcing Greenlanders to live under the American flag is not an option, the Danes must act upon our security and natural resource concerns with serious intent and find an adequate solution.

Well, if Greenlanders want to live under our flag, that's definitely their choice, too. That's why I hope they get a say on the matter. (And I think they are.)

Agree. The geopolitical high stakes struggle outcome could come down to the opinions of a majority of around 42,000 adults living in Greenland. I think we should give one million dollars to 23,000 of them as a "signing bonus". It would be worth it.

Heck, I'd be okay if they just wanted to be their own country and they agreed that they let us protect them... and mind their REM's, of course. I think everybody could live with that because, with all due respect to the Danes, our military is much stronger than theirs, and we already have a base or two there. Or even a joint protectorate could work, too. (I don't really know if it would or not. I'm just spitballing at this point. lol)

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:55 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Greenland sits in the middle of a direct route between us and western Russia, and also provides another access point by China.

Both Russian and Chinese ships are reportedly all over Greenland at the moment. Greenland also has REM that both countries are attempting to mine.

No one is seriously talking about invading them. We have talks scheduled Friday about purchasing Greenland.

do you know we already have a base on Greenland and an agreement to keep it there in perpetuity. Also that base is the only deepwater port on this side of the Arctic and only has ~3% of the personnel that were there during the cold war, with ZERO restrictions on us resupplying to cold war levels.

Also, before Trump started breaking down our alliances for "reasons", is there any evidence we couldn't completely control RE out of greenland since there are already dozens of US affiliated miners operating around there.

Again, what is the need?

Rent vs Own. What do you prefer?

(01-07-2026 02:02 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Fetterman comes out in support of buying greenland.

This year is a week old and its been one hell of a kick to the tiny gonads of the libturds.

actual brain damage=maga.

You're a Seward's folly kind of guy...

(01-07-2026 02:39 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:55 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Greenland sits in the middle of a direct route between us and western Russia, and also provides another access point by China.

Both Russian and Chinese ships are reportedly all over Greenland at the moment. Greenland also has REM that both countries are attempting to mine.

No one is seriously talking about invading them. We have talks scheduled Friday about purchasing Greenland.

do you know we already have a base on Greenland and an agreement to keep it there in perpetuity. Also that base is the only deepwater port on this side of the Arctic and only has ~3% of the personnel that were there during the cold war, with ZERO restrictions on us resupplying to cold war levels.

Also, before Trump started breaking down our alliances for "reasons", is there any evidence we couldn't completely control RE out of greenland since there are already dozens of US affiliated miners operating around there.

Again, what is the need?

Rent vs Own. What do you prefer?

Would you buy a house you had an agreement in perpetuity to rent for zero dollars and also got to share in capital gains from the valuation of the house?

(01-07-2026 02:26 PM)TripleA Wrote:  No, idiot, I did not say I had 50 more, I said if I gave you 50 more, it wouldn't matter.

See, this is your real problem. You're retarded.

While balls is not as evil as Tom is, he is certainly way more stupid than he is.

- $1.1 trillion worth of rare earth minerals which helps to break China’s monopoly

- Arctic trade routes which shortens Europe-Asia routes and boosts naval movements

- Better to own it to keep Russia and China presences out of the region, helps to protect Europe

(01-07-2026 02:41 PM)miko33 Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 02:02 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(01-07-2026 01:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Fetterman comes out in support of buying greenland.

This year is a week old and its been one hell of a kick to the tiny gonads of the libturds.

actual brain damage=maga.

You're a Seward's folly kind of guy...

Different time ,different economic system, different colonial ruler.

He’ll even then there’s a compelling argument that financially Alaska isn’t worth it
https://archive.nytimes.com/economix.blo...id-magnet/

However I’m glad it’s here for the naturescapes