Prop 15: Parental Rights Amendment
Provide that parents have the right "to exercise care, custody, and control of the parent’s child, including the right to make decisions concerning the child’s upbringing"

Guess what county opposed Prop 15

253 counties for

1 county against

It happens to be the same county Tang resides in

Another 253-1 was that you had to be a citizen to vote Prop 16

Folks in Travis County hoo boy

Reality escapes them

How far have we fallen that this subject has to actually have a "Proposition" voted on it. Islamo-Communist Revolution taking place right before our eyes. And like every other time those two destructive forces show up they get voted into power by the stupid thinking they will benefit from it or it will satisfy their unwarranted guilt. It NEVER does either.

This is awesome news. Well done, home state!

(11-05-2025 10:00 AM)BlueDragon Wrote:  Another 253-1 was that you had to be a citizen to vote Prop 16

Folks in Travis County hoo boy

Reality escapes them

Whew, I thought it would have been El Paso but I guess in the long run we still maintain mostly conservative views.

In El Paso, if you break the law, you WILL go to jail...for instance. If you try to steer school kids to the homosexual (perverted) agenda like MAPS, you will get fired...'cause it's happened at Franklin HS.

I don't get it. Did parents not already have that right?

(11-05-2025 10:38 AM)b2b Wrote:  I don't get it. Did parents not already have that right?

Yes. That said, due to how the political climate is these days, this is to ensure that parental rights remain intact statewide.

Eagleaidaholic: Hey, you're preaching to the choir, brother. It really should be common sense. Unfortunately, well, the left has a stranglehold on almost all forms of media in this country, including Hollywood and especially the MSM.

What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

(11-05-2025 10:02 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  How far have we fallen that this subject has to actually have a "Proposition" voted on it. Islamo-Communist Revolution taking place right before our eyes. And like every other time those two destructive forces show up they get voted into power by the stupid thinking they will benefit from it or it will satisfy their unwarranted guilt. It NEVER does either.

was my immediate thought ... yes, sir, it's amazingly disgusting having to preemptively define due to the fagoos that are a comin'...

Tejas and the rest of the country are lucky to have Abbott, Paxton, and Nelson at the head of their state's leadership...

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

wow ... at this point with his TDS hullaballoo, I reckon I'm not surprised ... #disappointing #unacceptable

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Probably

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

(11-05-2025 02:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

wow ... at this point with his TDS hullaballoo, I reckon I'm not surprised ... #disappointing #unacceptable

It is what it is, at this point. It actually doesn't bother me. I just wanted to bring it to 3A's attention in case he hasn't already seen it.

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

Nope, missed it. #7. And that one is a biggie

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

Nope. Got on you for stating wholly incorrectly what I supported. Maybe try actually reading and comprehending stuff instead of simply making stuff up. Like you did there, and like you do just now.

If that is what you have to stoop to make an inroad, pretty pathetic son. Its really amazing what the shittards here stoop to try and make hay. Too bad you in particular have seemingly devolved into simply a lying pile of turds here. You be you.

Having to lie your way into that form is truly the mark of a true profile in courage. Between your nothing but **** talk and and now just a made up pile of comments, you are truly a piece of work.

I assume it goes hand in hand with the Charlie Kirk Master Debater honor you seem to be striving for. And seems to be what defines you pretty much in whole at this point. Neat stuff. The person who has to lie their way to a point is nothing but an absolute puss. Which you seemingly fit to a tee, son. Im sure you are proud about that. Cool cool.

(11-05-2025 02:54 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:44 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 02:11 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 01:10 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(11-05-2025 12:40 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What kind of lead paint chip eating retard would actually vote against that?

Someone like the resident leftists we have on the board, for one.

I'm thinking tanq literally smashed the No button.

Well, considering how he tried to chastise me for bringing up how boys got in trouble because a girl who identified with a boy exposed herself in the boys locker room at a Virginia high school (it's the same as boys in girls locker rooms and boys in girls sports) should've been a factor yesterday, I'd say that's a resounding yes. Which reminds me...

Hey, 3A! Did you catch where the Drunk Patent Lawyer got on to me for bringing up respecting separation of genders from locker rooms and sports in the Election Results thread yesterday? If not, there's yet another one for your counter.

wow ... at this point with his TDS hullaballoo, I reckon I'm not surprised ... #disappointing #unacceptable

Id suggest reading my actual response there, stink. Instead of slurping Gemini's comments down in whole. I kind of expected a tad more from you than the nothing but acceptance that you show above. You be you.

"Charlie Kirk Master Debater." #8.