"I am not done, being unburdened by what I have not yet done, and that time is not yet seen in the passage of time of all things not yet done".

~Deep thoughts by Kamala Harris

She’s done on the national stage.

People have moved on from the absolute lunacy of the Progressive Left. Even centrist liberals are rejecting their lunacy.

It’s like believing there is still water after the well has run dry.

Not sure who they still trying to convince

Harris

Stick a fork in her she’s done

(10-25-2025 01:17 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  She’s done on the national stage.

People have moved on from the absolute lunacy of the Progressive Left. Even centrist liberals are rejecting their lunacy.

It’s like believing there is still water after the well has run dry.

Not sure who they still trying to convince

Harris

Stick a fork in her she’s done

If people have moved on from the lunacy of the Progressive Left, why is NYC about to elect an Islamic Communist for mayor?

(10-25-2025 02:28 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 01:17 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  She’s done on the national stage.

People have moved on from the absolute lunacy of the Progressive Left. Even centrist liberals are rejecting their lunacy.

It’s like believing there is still water after the well has run dry.

Not sure who they still trying to convince

Harris

Stick a fork in her she’s done

If people have moved on from the lunacy of the Progressive Left, why is NYC about to elect an Islamic Communist for mayor?

He should’ve said the country overall is moving on. Of course there are still some specific cities/states/districts where someone of her views can still win.

But Harris, personally, will not be a candidate in any of those places in ’26 or ’28. I suppose we could check back in 2029 and reassess the situation. But I really believe the cumulative impact of her campaigns in 2019 and 2024, plus the association with Biden, will just be too much for her to overcome.

With what?

A bottle of liquor?

(10-25-2025 01:06 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

She dun.

She jus don noe it yet.

She’s beyond done.

What a clown.

Her turkey timer popped up last November.

She could become governor easy

(10-25-2025 08:15 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  She could become governor easy

of California? Disagree. She would still need a huge amount of $$$ to run for that office — not as much as running for President, of course, but still a lot — and the kinds of people who would provide that $$$ want nothing to do with her.

(10-25-2025 08:46 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 08:15 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  She could become governor easy

of California? Disagree. She would still need a huge amount of $$$ to run for that office — not as much as running for President, of course, but still a lot — and the kinds of people who would provide that $$$ want nothing to do with her.

It doesn't matter who runs for Governor of California. A Democrat is going to win regardless. There is no Republican party left in that state.

(10-25-2025 09:03 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 08:46 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 08:15 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  She could become governor easy

of California? Disagree. She would still need a huge amount of $$$ to run for that office — not as much as running for President, of course, but still a lot — and the kinds of people who would provide that $$$ want nothing to do with her.

It doesn't matter who runs for Governor of California. A Democrat is going to win regardless. There is no Republican party left in that state.

The electorate is approx. 45% Dem, 25% Republican, 7% third party, and 23% unaffiliated.

The Dems don't even have a majority. But it would take everybody else to beat them.

https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-stats/ca

(10-25-2025 01:17 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  Stick a fork in her

Might as well. She’s had everything else stuck in her

She's right though, she's not done...she's just finished.

(10-26-2025 09:25 AM)olliebaba Wrote:  She's right though, she's not done...she's just finished.

That's good. I like it.

I thought she said she was "not dumb". But of course that too would be wrong.

(10-26-2025 01:24 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 09:03 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 08:46 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2025 08:15 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  She could become governor easy

of California? Disagree. She would still need a huge amount of $$$ to run for that office — not as much as running for President, of course, but still a lot — and the kinds of people who would provide that $$$ want nothing to do with her.

It doesn't matter who runs for Governor of California. A Democrat is going to win regardless. There is no Republican party left in that state.

The electorate is approx. 45% Dem, 25% Republican, 7% third party, and 23% unaffiliated.

The Dems don't even have a majority. But it would take everybody else to beat them.

https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-stats/ca

And Newsom is about to gerrymander Republicans out of existence in California.

Is that a threat?