(10-10-2025 06:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:22 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:17 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:12 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  You'd think certain people would know that, but nope. Not even close.

That was a nice little touch there in saying overpowered flashlights. I'm starting to wonder if someone gets their information from Reddit.

All signs point to yes. lol

All signs actually point to two dumbasses who can’t bother to check facts, high five over a leap of faith in stream, and their supposition ends up provably false. Then make fun of that mismatch in facts attributing it to Reddit style reading, when they can’t even bother with that.

Nicely played, sleuth meister twins. Nicely played.

Oh, I see you're back to name calling again, calling me a dumb ass. I didn't call you any names when you mentioned Memphis the other day. You didn't know any facts or bothered to check.

I mentioned that you actually went to the further edge -- high five with a joiner over your impression, make a smug re-comment on how dare they smoothly changed lasers to flashlights, and then call others reddit level readers. When it was your mistake at the outset

Yeah, thats kind of dumb*** behavior in my book. I guess not yours?

Drunk lawyer:

(10-10-2025 06:39 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  " involved four people shining overpowered flashlights in the eyes of drivers"

When did they start saying Lasers were overpowered flashlights?

On September 30, 2025, U.S. authorities announced the arrest of four undocumented immigrants in Portland for conducting coordinated laser strikes on law enforcement helicopters. According to Homeland Security, the suspects aimed high-powered lasers at aircraft operated by Customs and Border Protection, endangering flight operations and crew safety.
The suspects were charged under federal laws prohibiting the aiming of lasers at aircraft, which carry severe penalties including up to five years in prison. This incident underscores the ongoing concern about the use of lasers as disruptive or dangerous tools during civil disturbances in Portland.

Maybe check the facts. The cited portion happened pre- Sept 18. Per the filing.

Your brand new find is noted as Sept 30.

But hey, just try to make one incident into another with zero effort to check any facts. Neat stuff.

Have any more magic tricks for us?

OK, you got me what can I say. Did you have a reason for not adding the 30 Sep. issue to what's going on in Portland? You keep acting like there is no problem in Portland. Listening to you it's all a peaceful protest.

Mentioning the basis for the judges ruling. The ruling on the callup. A callup is judged to be valid or invalid on the date it is made. Callup was made on the 28th.

Acting like no problem? For the vast part, there isnt much violence by the protestors. And, as the evidence showed, there is some. All is managed.

The issue isnt whether "there is no problem". The issue is whether a callup is necessary. The issue is whether the feds and locals are able to manage the issue.

I doubt I have ever said it is *all* a peaceful protest there. Another excursion from fact there Red?

(10-10-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  This is you Tanq to a T. Been trying to figure out what you problem is and believe this is it.

A superiority complex is a psychological belief in being better than others, often masking feelings of inferiority, insecurity, or shame. Individuals with this trait may exhibit arrogance, condescension, and a need to dominate, while also being closed-minded and dismissive of others' opinions. The term was first coined by psychologist Alfred Adler and is often considered a defense mechanism rather than a formal diagnosis.

Characteristics of a superiority complex
Exaggerated self-importance: Believing one's abilities, accomplishments, and opinions are superior to others'.
Arrogance and condescension: Acting smug, arrogant, or talking down to people who are perceived as "inferior".
Dismissiveness: Being unwilling to listen to others' opinions, views, or feelings.
Boastfulness: Exaggerating accomplishments and achievements to gain validation.
Need for control: Desiring to dominate others and feeling a need to be in control of situations.

"I'm starting to wonder if someone gets their information from Reddit."

Who *literally* just said that? I seem to have forgotten....

"blah blah blah"

You now know what a certain drunk lawyer just said. In a thread. On a political subforum. That's part of a college sports message board forum. On the internet.

You're welcome.

(10-11-2025 08:51 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  "blah blah blah"

You now know what a certain drunk lawyer just said. In a thread. On a political subforum. That's part of a college sports message board forum. On the internet.

You're welcome.

Awww... litte Gemini tyke is maddy poo. Poor guy.

(10-11-2025 06:17 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

The ignorant will only watch the LSM so the only ones believing this Schiff are them, so nothing's changed. Ho hum.

*yaaaawwwnnnn*

They believe, with good reason, Democratic voters are incredibly ignorant and stupid.

(10-11-2025 08:42 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:22 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:17 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  That was a nice little touch there in saying overpowered flashlights. I'm starting to wonder if someone gets their information from Reddit.

All signs point to yes. lol

All signs actually point to two dumbasses who can’t bother to check facts, high five over a leap of faith in stream, and their supposition ends up provably false. Then make fun of that mismatch in facts attributing it to Reddit style reading, when they can’t even bother with that.

Nicely played, sleuth meister twins. Nicely played.

Oh, I see you're back to name calling again, calling me a dumb ass. I didn't call you any names when you mentioned Memphis the other day. You didn't know any facts or bothered to check.

I mentioned that you actually went to the further edge -- high five with a joiner over your impression, make a smug re-comment on how dare they smoothly changed lasers to flashlights, and then call others reddit level readers. When it was your mistake at the outset

Yeah, thats kind of dumb*** behavior in my book. I guess not yours?

Now you are making stuff up, I not surprised.

(10-11-2025 08:49 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  This is you Tanq to a T. Been trying to figure out what you problem is and believe this is it.

A superiority complex is a psychological belief in being better than others, often masking feelings of inferiority, insecurity, or shame. Individuals with this trait may exhibit arrogance, condescension, and a need to dominate, while also being closed-minded and dismissive of others' opinions. The term was first coined by psychologist Alfred Adler and is often considered a defense mechanism rather than a formal diagnosis.

Characteristics of a superiority complex
Exaggerated self-importance: Believing one's abilities, accomplishments, and opinions are superior to others'.
Arrogance and condescension: Acting smug, arrogant, or talking down to people who are perceived as "inferior".
Dismissiveness: Being unwilling to listen to others' opinions, views, or feelings.
Boastfulness: Exaggerating accomplishments and achievements to gain validation.
Need for control: Desiring to dominate others and feeling a need to be in control of situations.

"I'm starting to wonder if someone gets their information from Reddit."

Who *literally* just said that? I seem to have forgotten....

I fail to see what your comment has to do with your superiority complex problem.

(10-11-2025 08:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:39 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  " involved four people shining overpowered flashlights in the eyes of drivers"

When did they start saying Lasers were overpowered flashlights?

On September 30, 2025, U.S. authorities announced the arrest of four undocumented immigrants in Portland for conducting coordinated laser strikes on law enforcement helicopters. According to Homeland Security, the suspects aimed high-powered lasers at aircraft operated by Customs and Border Protection, endangering flight operations and crew safety.
The suspects were charged under federal laws prohibiting the aiming of lasers at aircraft, which carry severe penalties including up to five years in prison. This incident underscores the ongoing concern about the use of lasers as disruptive or dangerous tools during civil disturbances in Portland.

Maybe check the facts. The cited portion happened pre- Sept 18. Per the filing.

Your brand new find is noted as Sept 30.

But hey, just try to make one incident into another with zero effort to check any facts. Neat stuff.

Have any more magic tricks for us?

OK, you got me what can I say. Did you have a reason for not adding the 30 Sep. issue to what's going on in Portland? You keep acting like there is no problem in Portland. Listening to you it's all a peaceful protest.

Mentioning the basis for the judges ruling. The ruling on the callup. A callup is judged to be valid or invalid on the date it is made. Callup was made on the 28th.

Acting like no problem? For the vast part, there isnt much violence by the protestors. And, as the evidence showed, there is some. All is managed.

The issue isnt whether "there is no problem". The issue is whether a callup is necessary. The issue is whether the feds and locals are able to manage the issue.

I doubt I have ever said it is *all* a peaceful protest there. Another excursion from fact there Red?

I said you act like it. I never said you said it. Their you go again trying to put words in other peoples mouth.

" isn't much violence"

How much is too much in your book? Like I said the other day, " you want blood in the street" before anything is done.

He does that words in your mouth trick with a lot of his posts now. He just can't help himself.

(10-11-2025 11:37 AM)TripleA Wrote:  He does that words in your mouth trick with a lot of his posts now. He just can't help himself.

No, he can't. He thinks he's in a courtroom.

(10-11-2025 10:46 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-11-2025 08:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:39 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-10-2025 06:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  " involved four people shining overpowered flashlights in the eyes of drivers"

When did they start saying Lasers were overpowered flashlights?

On September 30, 2025, U.S. authorities announced the arrest of four undocumented immigrants in Portland for conducting coordinated laser strikes on law enforcement helicopters. According to Homeland Security, the suspects aimed high-powered lasers at aircraft operated by Customs and Border Protection, endangering flight operations and crew safety.
The suspects were charged under federal laws prohibiting the aiming of lasers at aircraft, which carry severe penalties including up to five years in prison. This incident underscores the ongoing concern about the use of lasers as disruptive or dangerous tools during civil disturbances in Portland.

Maybe check the facts. The cited portion happened pre- Sept 18. Per the filing.

Your brand new find is noted as Sept 30.

But hey, just try to make one incident into another with zero effort to check any facts. Neat stuff.

Have any more magic tricks for us?

OK, you got me what can I say. Did you have a reason for not adding the 30 Sep. issue to what's going on in Portland? You keep acting like there is no problem in Portland. Listening to you it's all a peaceful protest.

Mentioning the basis for the judges ruling. The ruling on the callup. A callup is judged to be valid or invalid on the date it is made. Callup was made on the 28th.

Acting like no problem? For the vast part, there isnt much violence by the protestors. And, as the evidence showed, there is some. All is managed.

The issue isnt whether "there is no problem". The issue is whether a callup is necessary. The issue is whether the feds and locals are able to manage the issue.

I doubt I have ever said it is *all* a peaceful protest there. Another excursion from fact there Red?

I said you act like it. I never said you said it. Their you go again trying to put words in other peoples mouth.

" isn't much violence"

How much is too much in your book? Like I said the other day, " you want blood in the street" before anything is done.

Good word spaghetti there champ. I list the violent acts, give credit to the violent acts in evidence, but in your world even when listing the actual violence in the record it seems to you as t "listening to [me] it is all a peaceful protest."

Listing and giving credit by my own posts is simply proof positive against that, friend.

Listing the actual violence in the record is, to you, "acting like there is no problem". My listing of the actual incidents that are in the evidentiary record is, once again, kind of simple negation of your shallow rhetoric, friend.

As for your 'putting words in [your] mouth', the italicized above simply arent. And you might note one of them is saying exactl opposite that you note bolded above. Neat second magic trick there, friend.

Quote: How much is too much in your book?

Ill take the predicates in the law for the answer, friend. How much is 'too much' to allow US military in domestic cites -- 1. actual military invasion by a foreign power; 2. actual rebellion within the United States 3. The President totally or near totally unable to enforce Federal law, either by natural disaster, or by state obstruction.

Ill even add a fourth for you : when the governor allows it and cooperates with it.

Quote:Like I said the other day, " you want blood in the street" before anything is done.

The presence of US military operating domestically in the United States is serious 'break glass *ONLY* in event of national or local existential crisis'. Kind of how the Constitutional order and military laws are supposed to work. Kind of based on a notion of literally nearly a quarter millennia of the basic notions of what our Constitutional order means.

Any other questions, my friend? As opposed to your shallow rhetoric above, that is.

(10-11-2025 12:08 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-11-2025 11:37 AM)TripleA Wrote:  He does that words in your mouth trick with a lot of his posts now. He just can't help himself.

No, he can't. He thinks he's in a courtroom.

Naw, I realize Im in chatroom with some.

Some of whom who blithely reference the Constitution and various things with it from time to time, but as general course simply are seemingly ignorant to much of it.

And for some -- instead simply rely on a course of comments comprising a major portion puny whiny insulting catcalls.

Absolutely. B/c you are too dishonest to have an adult debate with.

You keep repeating your BS reason we don't engage, which is wrong as usual, b/c several people have told you exactly what their issue is with you.

No courtroom would put up with that kind of idiocy. He’d be held in contempt on the basis of being a disruptive sideshow clown.

Do patent attorneys actually go to court?