https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdez8x693wko

well then they need to call up the senate democrats and tel lthem to stop blocking the release.

Uhhh, fine?

Let the aggrieved come forward all they want and state their case.

Why hasn’t that happened? At all?

Dudes dead, one way or another. They gonna sue him like suing Hefner? Or Kimmel, or Weinstein? Their old boss at Astronomer?

What’s your point here? Let’s re-rack Bubba into this, shall we?

Loons gon loon.


Sad.

Ask Markwayne Mullin who blocked the release.

What is all this bbc.com bullchit this libturd keeps posting?

Whether you like it or not all of this Russia, Russia, Russia, sedition is gonna be brought to light. No amount of trying to distract or miss Direct is gonna matter.

well, these gals could release the names of all the guys (and gals) they serviced....and got money for...

(07-28-2025 06:49 AM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote:  well, these gals could release the names of all the guys (and gals) they serviced....and got money for...

Well, that’s the point. They gotta wait and see who’s on the list before they decide who they can go after. Won’t look good going after somebody that’s not even on the list.

(07-28-2025 05:15 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  What is all this bbc.com bullchit this libturd keeps posting?

He's probably confused since bbc isn't the type of website he keeps hoping it is.

lol!

(07-27-2025 11:33 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  well then they need to call up the senate democrats and tel lthem to stop blocking the release.

From AI:
"On July 25, 2025, Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) introduced a resolution in the Senate calling for federal and state courts to immediately unseal all materials, including grand jury materials, related to the criminal investigations and prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. This move was aimed at promoting transparency and addressing public demand for the release of Epstein-related files. "

The Dem's are just playing politics. They had plenty of opportunity when they were in power to call for information release but shoot down Mullin's resolution now. Considering the subject matter, the cynical Dem posture is particularly disgusting.

The auto pens had this for four years. Where was the indignation then?

(07-27-2025 11:00 PM)Gitanole Wrote:  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdez8x693wko

Yet another gaslighting moronic leftist shows up unafraid of looking like a complete idiot. We called your bluff and now anyone on the left pushing for this has suddenly done a 180. That means we can safely assume you didn't get your copy of the daily talking points from your handlers. You need to tighten up, that's some sloppy activism.

(07-28-2025 06:31 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Whether you like it or not all of this Russia, Russia, Russia, sedition is gonna be brought to light. No amount of trying to distract or miss Direct is gonna matter.

Who is this miss Direct of whom you speak?

Reason number 3,923,465 nobody trust liberals.

(07-28-2025 06:49 AM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote:  well, these gals could release the names of all the guys (and gals) they serviced....and got money for...

I have a feeling they cannot do so based on documents they signed along the way. Doing so would likely bankrupt them (temporarily at least). Most/all probably cannot afford the penalty of breaking whatever they originally agreed to.

Let's be honest about this... it won't be good for either side. Politicians and donors will be implicated. Foreign politicians, big business CEOs, and others will all be implicated too. Let the chips fall where they fall... put it out, but both parties are scared about whose name would come out in a full release of records.

(07-28-2025 10:03 AM)mlb Wrote:  Let's be honest about this... it won't be good for either side. Politicians and donors will be implicated. Foreign politicians, big business CEOs, and others will all be implicated too. Let the chips fall where they fall... put it out, but both parties are scared about whose name would come out in a full release of records.

Good

(07-28-2025 10:03 AM)mlb Wrote:  Let's be honest about this... it won't be good for either side. Politicians and donors will be implicated. Foreign politicians, big business CEOs, and others will all be implicated too. Let the chips fall where they fall... put it out, but both parties are scared about whose name would come out in a full release of records.

So what? Does that mean that what these people did is somehow less of a crime or less reprehensible?

(07-28-2025 10:48 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(07-28-2025 10:03 AM)mlb Wrote:  Let's be honest about this... it won't be good for either side. Politicians and donors will be implicated. Foreign politicians, big business CEOs, and others will all be implicated too. Let the chips fall where they fall... put it out, but both parties are scared about whose name would come out in a full release of records.

So what? Does that mean that what these people did is somehow less of a crime or less reprehensible?

No. I'm just saying both sides act like the hold up is the other side. It isn't, it is BOTH sides who are the hold up.