(07-20-2025 04:39 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  We need out of NATO

And we need to expel the U.N.

(09-28-2025 08:07 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-20-2025 04:39 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  We need out of NATO

And we need to expel the U.N.

You know it's time to alter course when your nation's taxpayers are forced to pay for the meetings of those who constantly plot against you! To hell with the U.N. and all of those money-grubbing schmoozers who want to criticize their host for his generosity!

(09-28-2025 08:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(09-28-2025 08:07 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-20-2025 04:39 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  We need out of NATO

And we need to expel the U.N.

You know it's time to alter course when your nation's taxpayers are forced to pay for the meetings of those who constantly plot against you! To hell with the U.N. and all of those money-grubbing schmoozers who want to criticize their host for his generosity!

We have let the fox into the hen house.

Or to quote Pogo, we have met the enemy and he is us.

(09-28-2025 08:38 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(09-28-2025 08:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(09-28-2025 08:07 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-20-2025 04:39 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  We need out of NATO

And we need to expel the U.N.

You know it's time to alter course when your nation's taxpayers are forced to pay for the meetings of those who constantly plot against you! To hell with the U.N. and all of those money-grubbing schmoozers who want to criticize their host for his generosity!

We have let the fox into the hen house.

Or to quote Pogo, we have met the enemy and he is us.

Then it's time to skin the fox and give you wife a stole and prepare to fry chicken nuggets! We have to make the most of any situation! Adapt, Innovate, Overcome! The Marines Corp gets it right!

UK gov classifies opponents of mass migration as terrorists

Quote:The UK government's anti-radicalization program has classified concerns about Western culture and mass migration as indicators of "extreme right-wing terrorist ideologies."

The guidance appears in Prevent’s official “refresher awareness” course, a counter-extremism training module hosted on the gov.uk website. The material lists “cultural nationalism” as one of the “most common sub-categories of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideologies.

The "Prevent Duty Refresher Course" identified "cultural nationalism" as being the idea that “Western culture is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups," it describes. The Prevent program lists it alongside “white/ethno-nationalism” and “neo-Nazism” in related subcategories. According to the course material, these ideologies involve the view that demographic and cultural changes pose “an existential threat” to white people or “Western culture.”

Critics argue that the inclusion of “cultural nationalism” goes far beyond identifying violent extremism and instead labels concerns about immigration or assimilation as terrorist views. Social media users accused the government of equating patriotism with extremism, with one post saying, “I guess that makes me a terrorist then.”

The controversy comes as new United Nations data show the UK is projected to see the largest population growth among major European nations by 2100, driven by immigration. The UN’s World Population Prospects report estimates Britain’s population will increase 6.8 percent, from 69.6 million today to 74.3 million by the end of the century, while other European nations are expected to decline.

The report attributes the UK’s growth primarily to continued high net migration, projected to remain above 100,000 annually through 2099. Without migration, the report says, the UK population would fall below 50 million—its lowest level since the 1950s.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has similarly reported that an influx of 10 million immigrants within a decade could raise the population to 72.5 million by 2032, representing a 7.3 percent increase in just ten years.

This is what happens when you lose a whole generation of your strongest male DNA

"UK population would fall below 50 million—its lowest level since the 1950s."

You get conquered.

(10-15-2025 03:55 PM)shere khan Wrote:  This is what happens when you lose a whole generation of your strongest male DNA

"UK population would fall below 50 million—its lowest level since the 1950s."

You get conquered.

All of the young cucks vainly believe that machines and technology will save them in the next war and that the most technologically advanced army will prevail. Meanwhile a couple of well placed nukes in an airburst will fry the grid and the war will be reduced to boots on the ground. At that point numbers of troops matter. And a small number of defenders without the physical training for combat get you annihilated.

Even if the technology is a standoff boots matter.

The only technology that would work is an EMP at the frequency of the human heart. And that kills indiscriminately within the targeted area.

Western Civilization has lost its edge. Whatever is headed our way will become hand to hand at some point. Numbers will matter. In Korea our U.N. forces (mostly ours) would have a fantastical kill rate versus our losses ratio and would still be overrun.

And for those who trust AI, if we ever deploy AI for combat the real risk in it has already been realized in drones. Some drones have been hacked and redirected. Can you imagine having your enemy hack your AI weaponry and turn it on you?

And that takes you to satellites. If you lose the war in space, you lose the war. The magnetic anomaly over the South Atlantic which impacts GPS, may not be an anomaly. It might be a testing grounds.

(10-15-2025 06:10 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

lol ... wtf ... the guy behind the brit version of kneepads ... did george soros go back in time ... #doppelganger

(10-15-2025 06:13 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-15-2025 06:10 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

lol ... wtf ... the guy behind the brit version of kneepads ... did george soros go back in time ... #doppelganger

Uhm that's more like Old Beaver and Butthead! White people need to quit teaching wackiness, guilt for crap we never did and start teaching logic and reason, and self-defense and get ready. Folks like these only encourage our enemies. And in a world where commodity prices are soaring we need to wake up. The last 30 years has seen mass migration of people looking for basic necessities to life. The next 20 will see war over those resources and there won't be any negotiations made for hostage swaps. Why war? Those who need will seek to take, and those who have secure what they have through defense, and more importantly the curtailment of demand, which is a polite way of saying casualties inflicted.

(07-17-2025 08:33 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(07-17-2025 08:29 PM)otown Wrote:  Now allowing 16 and 17 year old to vote. I wonder how this turns out.........
https://www.semafor.com/article/07/17/20...l-election

They deserve what they get.

The rank and file British citizens do not deserve this. No Western nation has voted for mass migration, and have opposed it. It has been forced on them.

Mass Migration is anti-democratic, and any politician or NGO leader pushing it is a threat to democracy.

Israeli Fans Banned From Attending Soccer Match in the UK

Quote:An absolutely bonkers story is emerging from across the pond this Thursday afternoon, and it's not a good look for our British cousins.

The famed U.K. soccer team known as Aston Villa Football Club—Prince William, the heir to the throne, is a club superfan—announced on Thursday that would it not allow fans of the Israeli team Maccabi Tel Aviv to attend a November match at Aston Villa's stadium in Birmingham. From the announcement:

Aston Villa can confirm the club has been informed that no away fans may attend the UEFA Europa League match with Maccabi Tel Aviv on Thursday, November 6, following an instruction from the Safety Advisory Group.

As way of explanation, the team claimed the ban of Israeli (AKA, Jewish) fans—which they downplay as merely "away fans"—was due to security fears, saying local law enforcement "have public safety concerns outside the stadium bowl and the ability to deal with any potential protests on the night." The team, rather glaringly, did not address which segment of the community might show up with violent intentions toward fans of the Israeli team. Please feel free to draw your own conclusions.

Backlash was swift, with one conservative Member of Parliament tweeting he was "sad, angry and ashamed" at the decision to ban Maccabi Tel Aviv fans.

Those who've been paying attention to what's been happening in the U.K. of late might be gobsmacked to learn that Prime Minister Keir Starmer—who's often called "Two Tier" Keir for the two-tiered justice system that seems to have emerged during his time at 10 Downing Street—said Aston Villa had made "the wrong decision."

Starmer's take is rather rich considering his nation has seen supporters of Hamas regularly take to the streets to spew anti-Israel and antisemitic hatred in the wake of October 7. Violence and intimidation is the name of that game, and Starmer's government has done very little to beat it back.

Jewish fans of Aston Villa maintain blame for the decision falls directly on law enforcement officials, not the club or its fanbase.

Statement from the Aston Villa Jewish Villans supporters’ club, of which I’m proud to be honorary president:

“In the summer of 1938, on a tour of Germany, the name Aston Villa became famous around the world, as the only visiting team who refused an official request to perform the Nazi salute prior to kickoff. Today, the same club have been forced by the local authorities to salute modern day Nazism.

We lay no blame on Villa - it would absolutely not be safe to allow thousands of Jews to walk around Aston and its surroundings. Why that may be so should trouble the entire country.

It must also be said that following the announcement, we have been inundated with Villa fans happy to give up their seats to travelling Tel Aviv supporters.”

Charlie Kirk traveled to England back in May and was astounded by what he saw during his time there. He offered some on-point observations, such as it being a "totalitarian third-world hellhole" that was a "husk" of its former self. "It’s tragic," said Kirk. "I don’t say that with glib, I don’t say that with delight. It is sad. It’s chilling and it’s depressing."

He told GB News that "this is increasingly a conquered country … We love this country from afar, and we’re really sad about what’s happening to it, and what has happened to it." Kirk had also visited a cafe where "every single table was taken by a Mohammedan and a fully burqa-wearing woman – not a single native Brit."

In light of Charlie's experience, you can see how the U.K. has reached the point of banning Israelis from attending soccer matches.

We'll leave you with this: earlier this week, two of the returning Israeli hostages were treated to a special welcome home from Maccabi Tel Aviv and its fans.

it's an island that's becoming more irrelevant by the tick tock ... fk'n pompous elitist dipshites ... it could happen here if'n, Ja?!

@formerEmpire

UK’s Islamophobia/Anti-Muslim Hatred Definition: A Further Erosion of Free Speech?

Quote:The UK Labour government is advancing a non-statutory definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” or “anti-Muslim hatred.” It explicitly avoids the term “Islamophobia” in response to free speech criticisms.

The draft definition, reported by BBC News on December 15, 2025, states: “Anti-Muslim hostility is engaging in or encouraging criminal acts, including acts of violence, vandalism of property, and harassment and intimidation whether physical, verbal, written or electronically communicated, which is directed at Muslims or those perceived to be Muslims because of their religion, ethnicity or appearance.

It is also the prejudicial stereotyping and racialisation of Muslims, as part of a collective group with set characteristics, to stir up hatred against them, irrespective of their actual opinions, beliefs or actions as individuals. It is engaging in prohibited discrimination where the relevant conduct – including the creation or use of practices and biases within institutions – is intended to disadvantage Muslims in public and economic life.” (Source: BBC News, December 15, 2025).

Working group chair Dominic Grieve KC, a former Conservative Attorney General, states the definition fully protects freedom of expression, including the right to criticize Islamic doctrines and practices.

Baroness Shaista Gohir, another group member, says it recognizes real experiences of targeting based on perceived Muslim identity. Government officials point to a 19% increase in recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes for the year ending March 2025 (Home Office statistics) and insist the definition is only for monitoring and reporting, not new law.

Critics reject these assurances. Lord Toby Young of the Free Speech Union calls it redundant and dangerous, granting Muslims additional protections not given to other religious groups. He warns it duplicates conduct already criminalized under the Public Order Act 1986 and Equality Act 2010, while terms like “prejudicial stereotyping” and “racialisation” invite subjective interpretation.

Any religious or ideological belief system, including Islam, must remain open to criticism, ridicule, satire, or mockery without institutional penalties. Shielding one faith creates unequal treatment and undermines universal free expression.

This draft follows the 2018 All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) definition that framed “Islamophobia” as racism targeting “expressions of Muslimness.” The previous government rejected it for chilling speech.

Yet Labour, Liberal Democrats, and dozens of local councils adopted it informally, embedding it in education, workplace, and hate-crime policies without parliamentary legislation. The same non-legislative route is now being used again, allowing gradual restrictions through the back door.

In the United States, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) promotes a similar definition of Islamophobia as prejudice causing discrimination and oppression, often framed as structural racism. CAIR’s 2025 Civil Rights Report recorded over 10,000 complaints—the highest ever—linked to the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Cities such as Seattle and Minneapolis, along with university systems like the University of California, have adopted comparable definitions informally for diversity training and hate-incident reporting. Campus speech codes using these concepts have already led to disciplinary actions and First Amendment challenges.

Recent 2025 designations of CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist-linked in Texas and Florida have been labelled Islamophobic by CAIR, intensifying calls for protective definitions. No national framework exists under the Trump administration, but localized implementations continue.

In both the UK and US, non-legislative adoption lets definitions influence training, reporting, and enforcement without proper scrutiny. Official assurances ring hollow against the risk that vague wording will deter legitimate debate on religious practices, integration, or doctrine.

This incremental process chips away at open discourse, prioritizing selective sensitivities over the fundamental right to question any belief system without fear.

(10-16-2025 04:58 AM)HawkeyeCoug Wrote:  

(07-17-2025 08:33 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(07-17-2025 08:29 PM)otown Wrote:  Now allowing 16 and 17 year old to vote. I wonder how this turns out.........
https://www.semafor.com/article/07/17/20...l-election

They deserve what they get.

The rank and file British citizens do not deserve this. No Western nation has voted for mass migration, and have opposed it. It has been forced on them.

Mass Migration is anti-democratic, and any politician or NGO leader pushing it is a threat to democracy.

Unfortunately, leftists here and in Europe have such bleeding hearts for the savages that will do them harm. They are too stupid and evil to see it though.

But but but muh Russia

I live in Retardia

Here the Muslim countries are simply too far away & across the ocean to come here in bulk. The bigger issue is Hispanics, although they do a much better job of assimilating. - & we do a much better job of trying to assimilate them