(07-11-2025 11:25 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If the blue states want to burn money on the murder of babies, they should fund it. Not a dime should come from federal.

Agreed,
What the heck happened to the “Hyde Amendment” anyway?

No Federal $$$’s for being stupidly irresponsible?

(07-12-2025 08:22 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 08:17 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Good lord you were that nerd in law school who argued what the law should be rather than what it is.

And your the prick that thinks they can roll every one by being a dumb*** namecaller. Oh, a dumass namecaller who seemingly also feels the prerequisite of pulling predicates put of his ass, to be specific.

Care to exhibit that some more for us, my friend?

What name did he call you?
I don’t see it, but maybe I just missed it…

Oh no, Rath called Tanq a nerd!

(07-12-2025 09:42 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 09:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Easy peasy tanq, quote me some posts where I called you a name. I can post dozens of the posts where you called me a name. Pretty much EVERY post where you address me.

You are nothing more than a serial liar.

Dude, every single post re: me you throw out there when you decide to do your 'stalk every post' thingy throws shade at me.

And oh good lordy, when I return the tone and tenor you flip out even more in your manic mode. Lolz.

Just like today, mind you. Double Lolz.

I have to tell you Tanq, you stalk everyone on this Board that you do not agree with. It's also kind of funny you trying to take the Moral High-ground about the name calling. You calling anyone a "whinny ******" is name calling.

(07-12-2025 03:13 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-11-2025 11:25 PM)UABFAN23 Wrote:  If the blue states want to burn money on the murder of babies, they should fund it. Not a dime should come from federal.

Agreed,
What the heck happened to the “Hyde Amendment” anyway?

No Federal $$$’s for being stupidly irresponsible?

Hyde Amendment still in force. PP offers loads of other medical services across the board the women aside from abortion.

(07-12-2025 03:35 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 09:42 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 09:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Easy peasy tanq, quote me some posts where I called you a name. I can post dozens of the posts where you called me a name. Pretty much EVERY post where you address me.

You are nothing more than a serial liar.

Dude, every single post re: me you throw out there when you decide to do your 'stalk every post' thingy throws shade at me.

And oh good lordy, when I return the tone and tenor you flip out even more in your manic mode. Lolz.

Just like today, mind you. Double Lolz.

I have to tell you Tanq, you stalk everyone on this Board that you do not agree with. It's also kind of funny you trying to take the Moral High-ground about the name calling. You calling anyone a "whinny ******" is name calling.

As to the bolded -- I simply do not enter into rando conversations to engage in name calling or casting shade. Nor do I start the name calling or casting shade.

As to the remainder of your comments -- yes, I call 3A a whiny *****. In light of his constant stream of shade without ever bothering to address anything substantive. Absolutely. See my comment just above.

(07-12-2025 03:22 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Oh no, Rath called Tanq a nerd!

Maybe take a look at the entirety of his comments. Just saying. Or simply blot them out as seems to be your schtick.

Hey doofus, I have told you a dozen times, I refuse to engage you in debate. I did for months, but it's a waste of my time, b/c you ignore anything anybody else says, or discount it out of hand, or if you can't rebut it, you pick out some minor point and go off on a tangent.

I have no problem engaging anybody else in a normal manner, but of course you ignore that.

3 in a row on ignore...geat feature

(07-12-2025 03:22 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Oh no, Rath called Tanq a nerd!

Now we are getting to the heart of the matter. I've hurt his feelings!

Jeebus, how do these people sustain meaningful relationships in the 3D world?

(07-12-2025 03:56 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 03:22 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Oh no, Rath called Tanq a nerd!

Now we are getting to the heart of the matter. I've hurt his feelings!

Jeebus, how do these people sustain meaningful relationships in the 3D world?

I have to think he acts differently in front of people. If he acted like he does on here, he would get punched in the nose repeatedly.

Guessing he'd also be living alone paying alimony if he acted like this in the real world.

He comes here for mental keyboard swordplay. Must scratch a weird itch.

(07-12-2025 03:58 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 03:56 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 03:22 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Oh no, Rath called Tanq a nerd!

Now we are getting to the heart of the matter. I've hurt his feelings!

Jeebus, how do these people sustain meaningful relationships in the 3D world?

I have to think he acts differently in front of people. If he acted like he does on here, he would get punched in the nose repeatedly.

You are correct that I do. And you would understand that most people I interact with arent the shrill whiny ******* that many in this forum repeatedly show themselves as.

Imagine that.

(07-12-2025 08:32 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It's not hard. I try not to let personal opinion cloud predictive analysis.

I'm not rooting. And I'm not trying to advocate to change anyone's mind or show them how smart I am.

This is a water is wet legal issue. It will get hammered on appeal.

Yep.

Yeah, it's always all our fault and never yours, tanq.

Did it ever occur to you that NONE of us started out harassing you? Why do you think we do that?

We eventually got there b/c you are so arrogant and rude.

The fact that you can't figure that out, or refuse to admit it, is mind boggling.

(07-12-2025 03:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey doofus, I have told you a dozen times, I refuse to engage you in debate. I did for months, but it's a waste of my time, b/c you ignore anything anybody else says, or discount it out of hand, or if you can't rebut it, you pick out some minor point and go off on a tangent.

I have no problem engaging anybody else in a normal manner, but of course you ignore that.

I challenge items that are facially incorrect for the most part, 3A. And point out rhetorically stupid comments as rhetorically stupid comments.

And some, like you, blow up and simply go off just like you do right above.

And others, like you presently, simply decide to revert to acting like whiny ******* on a near constant basis.

Kind of the way the same gaggle does with anything that runs against their political programming in this forum.

In your alls book, engaging normally seems to simply turn any political difference, or challenge of their favorite thin ass rhetoric into a constant litany of no substance coupled with nearly unitary personal shade. Just like this segment of this thread exhibits.

Easy peasy -- you all cut the butthurt shade, I dont make return shade. Simple issue. One that seems to elude some people. And to be honest, there seems to be a core that I think cannot even bother to change from. Pretty obvious.

(07-12-2025 04:15 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(07-12-2025 08:32 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It's not hard. I try not to let personal opinion cloud predictive analysis.

I'm not rooting. And I'm not trying to advocate to change anyone's mind or show them how smart I am.

This is a water is wet legal issue. It will get hammered on appeal.

Yep.

Cool cool. We shall see.

I have never blown up on on you one time, bozo. You would know if I did. I normally either shake my head at you, or just laugh at you. Or make fun of you.

You, OTOH, once let off a couple of choice cuss words on Trump (which you don't normally do), b/c you let your emotions get the best of you. Your TDS slipped out.

(07-12-2025 04:39 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I have never blown up on on you one time, bozo. You would know if I did. I normally either shake my head at you, or just laugh at you. Or make fun of you.

You, OTOH, once let off a couple of choice cuss words on Trump (which you don't normally do), b/c you let your emotions get the best of you. Your TDS slipped out.

Nice deflection. The issue is making non-substantive shade, insults. Somehow you now change that to '[you] have never blown up on on [sic] [me] one time, bozo'

When you change the goalposts -- imagine that -- you are correct. In that newly formed standard, I have never done the same to you. Cool cool.

Somehow my calling trump a few cuss words, is now evidence of....... something. Something not really the subject of this conversation. But if it makes you feel better, champ -- go for it. Cool cool again.

And I also noted that ou missed the couple of times that we agreed on some of Trumps policies and views. I, for the most part, am not a fan of either the man, nor many of his thin stupid policies. I tend to note my exceptions to his policies here. But, true to form, the dude who whines cannot simply accept that I have an issue with his policies -- but somehow chooses to cast it and minimize it as nothing more than TDS.

Funny thing, I look at your just past diatribe on me.

"b/c you ignore anything anybody else says" -- like you ignore my issues that I actually agree with Trump,

"or discount it out of hand" -- just like you ascribe to me the issue of 'TDS'.

" or if you can't rebut it, you pick out some minor point and go off on a tangent" -- and what is the point of Trump policies, or TDS, or anything else in your post above dealing with the issue of me acting like a jacksass to those who treat me like a *******?

Lolz. Wow, your post above about " b/c you ignore anything anybody else says, or discount it out of hand, or if you can't rebut it, you pick out some minor point and go off on a tangent" given your jsut now delivered pile of garbage seems to be a very humorous parcel of lack of self-reflection, my friend.

Lolz.

(07-12-2025 04:17 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Yeah, it's always all our fault and never yours, tanq.

Did it ever occur to you that NONE of us started out harassing you? Why do you think we do that?

We eventually got there b/c you are so arrogant and rude.

The fact that you can't figure that out, or refuse to admit it, is mind boggling.

Sociopath