(06-18-2025 08:57 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  If facebook would unlock his page, we would see for sure.

If your head wasn't up your ass and you weren't a lying troll, you'd admit what we already know you know.

Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

What exactly in that post was "angry?"

So the bolded above was just good natured neighborly banter?

Amazing what hypocrites Tom and tanq are.

(06-18-2025 06:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 01:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  If facebook would unlock his page, we would see for sure.

If your head wasn't up your ass and you weren't a lying troll, you'd admit what we already know you know.

Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

Quote:Anger management classes teach individuals how to identify and manage their anger in healthy ways. These classes are designed to help people understand anger triggers, develop coping mechanisms, and improve communication skills. They can be beneficial for those struggling with anger, stress, or communication issues, and may be court-ordered or sought for personal development.

Hey, you actually researched something. It's a start at least...keep it up!

Yeah, researching tweets is such a productive endeavor, lol. I'm sure you do it incessantly before you post any.

How about just consider tweets as comments from people interested in the subject matter, then either agree with them or present something to refute the premise.

Or...just ignore them.

(06-18-2025 08:52 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 07:55 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

What exactly in that post was "angry?"

Tom, you're angry every time you come here to post. You probably hear Trump's name a bunch of times throughout the day, and you fly into a fit of rage when you hear it.

Sure, Jan.

If rolling on the floor laughing my ass off at the stupidity of you and the trump cult is "angry," guilty as charged!

First of all, stop calling me woman's name.

Second, how many times do I have to tell you that I do not associate with Trump or MAGA? I don't like either one. I don't know why you keep lumping me into those categories.

I didn't lump you, Sue.

(06-18-2025 08:59 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:57 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  If your head wasn't up your ass and you weren't a lying troll, you'd admit what we already know you know.

Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

What exactly in that post was "angry?"

So the bolded above was just good natured neighborly banter?

Amazing what hypocrites Tom and tanq are.

Maybe it's because their user names start with a "T."

Oh, wait...

(06-18-2025 09:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:52 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 07:55 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  What exactly in that post was "angry?"

Tom, you're angry every time you come here to post. You probably hear Trump's name a bunch of times throughout the day, and you fly into a fit of rage when you hear it.

Sure, Jan.

If rolling on the floor laughing my ass off at the stupidity of you and the trump cult is "angry," guilty as charged!

First of all, stop calling me woman's name.

Second, how many times do I have to tell you that I do not associate with Trump or MAGA? I don't like either one. I don't know why you keep lumping me into those categories.

I didn't lump you, Sue.

Yes, you did.

Tom, you're not clever. You're not edgy. I see you for the mentally ill immature leftist little boy that you are.

I want to feel sorry for your family, and the fact that they have to put up with you, but they're probably just like you in every way.

(06-18-2025 08:53 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Don't think for one minute that I haven't forgotten Tom calling me a pervert. When he did that, he crossed the line with me.

When did this supposedly happen?

I searched back to April of 2022, when it says you registered here, and found zero instances of me calling you that word.

Did I use a different context of that word?

(06-18-2025 09:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:53 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Don't think for one minute that I haven't forgotten Tom calling me a pervert. When he did that, he crossed the line with me.

When did this supposedly happen?

I searched back to April of 2022, when it says you registered here, and found zero instances of me calling you that word.

Did I use a different context of that word?

You called me a pervert 3 months ago when we were having an argument about something, most likely Trump related.

(06-18-2025 08:57 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  If facebook would unlock his page, we would see for sure.

If your head wasn't up your ass and you weren't a lying troll, you'd admit what we already know you know.

Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

What exactly in that post was "angry?"

So the bolded above was just good natured neighborly banter?

Yes. Are you not familiar with the usual banter between me and Umabla? We have a long history. Yes, this is good-natured.

I rest my case.

(06-18-2025 09:01 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 01:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  If your head wasn't up your ass and you weren't a lying troll, you'd admit what we already know you know.

Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

Quote:Anger management classes teach individuals how to identify and manage their anger in healthy ways. These classes are designed to help people understand anger triggers, develop coping mechanisms, and improve communication skills. They can be beneficial for those struggling with anger, stress, or communication issues, and may be court-ordered or sought for personal development.

Hey, you actually researched something. It's a start at least...keep it up!

Yeah, researching tweets is such a productive endeavor, lol. I'm sure you do it incessantly before you post any.

How about just consider tweets as comments from people interested in the subject matter, then either agree with them or present something to refute the premise.

Or...just ignore them.

If tweets are claiming to make factual statements, yes, I normally vet them with another source before posting. Of course, I've posted some that turned out not to be correct...we all have.

(06-18-2025 09:04 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:52 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:30 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 07:55 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Tom, you're angry every time you come here to post. You probably hear Trump's name a bunch of times throughout the day, and you fly into a fit of rage when you hear it.

Sure, Jan.

If rolling on the floor laughing my ass off at the stupidity of you and the trump cult is "angry," guilty as charged!

First of all, stop calling me woman's name.

Second, how many times do I have to tell you that I do not associate with Trump or MAGA? I don't like either one. I don't know why you keep lumping me into those categories.

I didn't lump you, Sue.

Yes, you did.

If you took it that way, that's not what I was intending. I called your posts stupidity, like theirs. That doesn't mean that you're in the trump cult.

(06-18-2025 09:06 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Tom, you're not clever. You're not edgy. I see you for the mentally ill immature leftist little boy that you are.

I want to feel sorry for your family, and the fact that they have to put up with you, but they're probably just like you in every way.

Sure, Jan. Seems like some projection going on there.

And kindly, leave my family out of your posts.

(06-18-2025 09:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:01 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 01:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:38 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Why are you so angry, Tom? Did you have another sugar rush today?

Quote:Anger management classes teach individuals how to identify and manage their anger in healthy ways. These classes are designed to help people understand anger triggers, develop coping mechanisms, and improve communication skills. They can be beneficial for those struggling with anger, stress, or communication issues, and may be court-ordered or sought for personal development.

Hey, you actually researched something. It's a start at least...keep it up!

Yeah, researching tweets is such a productive endeavor, lol. I'm sure you do it incessantly before you post any.

How about just consider tweets as comments from people interested in the subject matter, then either agree with them or present something to refute the premise.

Or...just ignore them.

If tweets are claiming to make factual statements, yes, I normally vet them with another source before posting. Of course, I've posted some that turned out not to be correct...we all have.

Tweets are comments from people. Nothing more or less. They don't require vetting. If you disagree with a premise, you have every opportunity to make a case to the contrary.

I post literally dozens of tweets a day to engender discussion on specific topics. Sorry if it offends you that I don't vet them all before you see them.

(06-18-2025 09:06 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Tom, you're not clever. You're not edgy. I see you for the mentally ill immature leftist little boy that you are.

I want to feel sorry for your family, and the fact that they have to put up with you, but they're probably just like you in every way.

Tom is paid to post here. This is his job. He only works 8-5 Monday thru Friday. Ignore him. He probably doesn’t believe half the propaganda he posts.

(06-18-2025 09:19 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 08:53 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Don't think for one minute that I haven't forgotten Tom calling me a pervert. When he did that, he crossed the line with me.

When did this supposedly happen?

I searched back to April of 2022, when it says you registered here, and found zero instances of me calling you that word.

Did I use a different context of that word?

You called me a pervert 3 months ago when we were having an argument about something, most likely Trump related.

I did a search for the word pervert and looked at every page of every thread I've posted in where that word was used in a post going back to March of 2022 and did not find any.

I found several instances of others calling ME that though.

(06-18-2025 09:29 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:01 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 01:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

Hey, you actually researched something. It's a start at least...keep it up!

Yeah, researching tweets is such a productive endeavor, lol. I'm sure you do it incessantly before you post any.

How about just consider tweets as comments from people interested in the subject matter, then either agree with them or present something to refute the premise.

Or...just ignore them.

If tweets are claiming to make factual statements, yes, I normally vet them with another source before posting. Of course, I've posted some that turned out not to be correct...we all have.

Tweets are comments from people. Nothing more or less. They don't require vetting. If you disagree with a premise, you have every opportunity to make a case to the contrary.

I post literally dozens of tweets a day to engender discussion on specific topics. Sorry if it offends you that I don't vet them all before you see them.

It doesn't offend me. Stop flattering yourself.

And no, not all tweets are comments...or opinions...as you seem to be implying. Many ARE trying to make factual statements. If they're not, then you're just using them to reinforce YOUR opinion. That seems lazy, no? Do you really want to just look for yes-men to validate your opinion when it may be completely wrong?

(06-18-2025 09:30 AM)No Bull Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:06 AM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Tom, you're not clever. You're not edgy. I see you for the mentally ill immature leftist little boy that you are.

I want to feel sorry for your family, and the fact that they have to put up with you, but they're probably just like you in every way.

Tom is paid to post here. This is his job. He only works 8-5 Monday thru Friday. Ignore him. He probably doesn’t believe half the propaganda he posts.

Whatever you need to cope, I guess. You do you.

What's that saying about opinions and horses asses? Something like "everyone's got one".

Just like celebrities who give us their opinions and because they're celebrities we're supposed to think that they're smarter than anyone and should agree. LOL

(06-18-2025 09:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:29 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:01 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hey, you actually researched something. It's a start at least...keep it up!

Yeah, researching tweets is such a productive endeavor, lol. I'm sure you do it incessantly before you post any.

How about just consider tweets as comments from people interested in the subject matter, then either agree with them or present something to refute the premise.

Or...just ignore them.

If tweets are claiming to make factual statements, yes, I normally vet them with another source before posting. Of course, I've posted some that turned out not to be correct...we all have.

Tweets are comments from people. Nothing more or less. They don't require vetting. If you disagree with a premise, you have every opportunity to make a case to the contrary.

I post literally dozens of tweets a day to engender discussion on specific topics. Sorry if it offends you that I don't vet them all before you see them.

It doesn't offend me. Stop flattering yourself.

And no, not all tweets are comments...or opinions...as you seem to be implying. Many ARE trying to make factual statements. If they're not, then you're just using them to reinforce YOUR opinion. That seems lazy, no? Do you really want to just look for yes-men to validate your opinion when it may be completely wrong?

Would you prefer that I post tweets I don't agree with? Whether a tweet presents what you deem to be a factual statement or not, it's still just some anonymous dude posting something he believes, and you have every right to disagree with the premise.

What you don't have is the right to demand that I vet every one of them before I post them for discussion.