I am tempted to set him free under the stipulation he remain in deep blue areas

Hey Tanq, did you see the two X posts I added to my reply above?

Oh, and the reading reference had to do with you constantly repeating the "all persons" phrase in the Constitution. All that other windbag stuff you typed was irrelevant to the point, as usual.

Well, if I was Garcia I'd rather be in a US prison than in that other one he's in now. I guess in a way he won something. I just hope he's in ours for a LOOONGG time. Free meals and a bed, what more can he ask for?

(06-07-2025 10:35 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey Tanq, did you see the two X posts I added to my reply above?

Oh, and the reading reference had to do with you constantly repeating the "all persons" phrase in the Constitution. All that other windbag stuff you typed was irrelevant to the point, as usual.

Less windbaggy than your usual claptrap that you went off on that the left defends the person Abrego, and the issue is the application of due process. Yeah, your fing astute insight is, "BS". Notwithstanding anything actually in the record. Imagine that, hoss.

Btw, 3A -- the issue is those on the left championing the man Abrego, and not the issue of due process.

As to the first video you post -- Scott Jennings is the guy saying that. Maybe you might consider that is SJ trying to rhetorically paraphrase that. Didnt catch that. I doubt you even fing watched that.

I guess the person from the left merely saying he is 'a Maryland man' falls short of the demonization you expect and require. Bummer. Quite the championing of the guy. Good grief that is clutching at straws.

The second one is a DHS person saying that same paraphrase. Imagine that.

I am sure that the DHS is now making that comment, and that Scott Jennings is as well. Seems about the only go-to they have at this point.

Abrego may very well be a **** hole monster. Let the courts decide it.

But you? Aww, just post more of your rhetorical dreck. Seems to do you well.

Do you simply post **** blind without any analysis? Sure seems that way.

Apparently you watch zero TV. Look them up yourself. I'm not your law clerk.

It's hilarious that you claim nobody called him a Maryland dad, or a construction worker (he apparently never was), or living a quiet life.

(06-07-2025 12:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Apparently you watch zero TV. Look them up yourself. I'm not your law clerk.

It's hilarious that you claim nobody said that.

First, I said no one was championing the guy Abrego, they are championing the cause of due process.

Second, apparently, you dont understand the simple English phrases and words that come out at you from that box.

You be you.

Third, apparently you dont understand your 'proof' is two righties claiming that is the case (i.e. ginning that issue up).

Are you slow in the head? If you are too stupid to note that Scott Jennings is on a soapbox claiming other people said that, and that a person from the DHS is on similar soapbox claiming that, you really might be that stupendously stupid.

(06-07-2025 10:28 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  I am tempted to set him free under the stipulation he remain in deep blue areas

and as long as he is quadruple boosted.

(06-07-2025 10:19 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 10:10 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 10:03 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 09:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Patrick Murphy just did the same damn thing in an interview on Fox. Claimed it was never about the man and always about due process. BS.

Care to tie us in to your facts and proof about that being BS?

Last I saw, most (if not all) who have taken the stance of Abrego should be returned have championed *only* the due process concerns.

And hate to tell you, my friend, you dont have to be an angel to qualify for due process protections. Last I saw, the terminology in the relevant portions of the Constitution is 'no person... shall be denied due process.'

Seriously? You don't think a single person in the media championed the man, and not just the process? You know, the "Maryland dad, living a quiet life and working in construction?"

Then show us a single instance where the issue was the innocence of the guy, and not due process. Oh, I forgot, asking you to show facts on broad ass supposition is like kryptonite.

Quote:And stop repeating yourself. The rest of us can read just like you do.

You act all riled up that the guy is getting the due process that should have been originally afforded him, and go out of your way to paint that support of due process as championing gang bangers.

Considering the shallow depth of that equivalence -- yeah, I have serious doubts about your ability to perform that last sentence. So no, I repeat the literal basics because you seemingly at the surface level dont seem to comprehend.

Bummer. You dont have to be an angel to enjoy due process protection. Kind of a fing mic drop to all your (stupidly) shallow and (massively) rhetorical histrionics above. Bummer.

Broken May 3, 2025 by AAA

(06-07-2025 12:06 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 10:19 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 10:10 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 10:03 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 09:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Patrick Murphy just did the same damn thing in an interview on Fox. Claimed it was never about the man and always about due process. BS.

Care to tie us in to your facts and proof about that being BS?

Last I saw, most (if not all) who have taken the stance of Abrego should be returned have championed *only* the due process concerns.

And hate to tell you, my friend, you dont have to be an angel to qualify for due process protections. Last I saw, the terminology in the relevant portions of the Constitution is 'no person... shall be denied due process.'

Seriously? You don't think a single person in the media championed the man, and not just the process? You know, the "Maryland dad, living a quiet life and working in construction?"

Then show us a single instance where the issue was the innocence of the guy, and not due process. Oh, I forgot, asking you to show facts on broad ass supposition is like kryptonite.

Quote:And stop repeating yourself. The rest of us can read just like you do.

You act all riled up that the guy is getting the due process that should have been originally afforded him, and go out of your way to paint that support of due process as championing gang bangers.

Considering the shallow depth of that equivalence -- yeah, I have serious doubts about your ability to perform that last sentence. So no, I repeat the literal basics because you seemingly at the surface level dont seem to comprehend.

Bummer. You dont have to be an angel to enjoy due process protection. Kind of a fing mic drop to all your (stupidly) shallow and (massively) rhetorical histrionics above. Bummer.

Broken May 3, 2025 by AAA

Cool cool, Shere Karen. About the limit of substance for you around here. Dont give yourself another nosebleed with that effort.

(06-07-2025 12:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Apparently you watch zero TV. Look them up yourself. I'm not your law clerk.

It's hilarious that you claim nobody called him a Maryland dad, or a construction worker (he apparently never was), or living a quiet life.

^
Did not read ambulance chaser

Are all these people lying, Tanq? The Dem pols didn't post their comments on X. They said it in TV interviews, and the MSM said it on their shows.

Are you really this dense?

Thanks, CP. Another stupid hill that Tanq dies on.

(06-07-2025 12:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Are all these people lying, Tanq? The Dem pols didn't post their comments on X. They said it in TV interviews, and the MSM said it on their shows.

Are you really this dense?

Narcissitic sociopath sub 80

(06-07-2025 12:01 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-07-2025 12:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Apparently you watch zero TV. Look them up yourself. I'm not your law clerk.

It's hilarious that you claim nobody said that.

First, I said no one was championing the guy Abrego, they are championing the cause of due process.

Second, apparently, you dont understand the simple English phrases and words that come out at you from that box.

You be you.

Third, apparently you dont understand your 'proof' is two righties claiming that is the case (i.e. ginning that issue up).

Are you slow in the head? If you are too stupid to note that Scott Jennings is on a soapbox claiming other people said that, and that a person from the DHS is on similar soapbox claiming that, you really might be that stupendously stupid.

bull**** you leftists are championing illegal immigration en masse. You choose a hispanic because he belongs to one of your marxist oppressed classes. He's a pos that doesn't belong in the country.

But Tanq claims he's not a lefty. He's a real life El Paso ambulance chasing Libertarian with conservative leanings.

He just has a terminal case of TDS due to J6.

(06-07-2025 12:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  But Tanq claims he's not a lefty. He's a real life El Paso ambulance chasing Libertarian with conservative leanings.

He just has a terminal case of TDS due to J6.

Well you know what they say about the left all they do is lie, as did their hero's Marx, Alinsky, and the father of all liars.

(06-07-2025 12:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  But Tanq claims he's not a lefty. He's a real life El Paso ambulance chasing Libertarian with conservative leanings.

He just has a terminal case of TDS due to J6.

Deport him

Hey Tanq, I guess you missed The Atlantic headline in my Post #73 calling Garcia "a Maryland father," or all 3 of CP's examples in Post #71. Cool cool.