What I love is the constantly evolving retrovirus of pearl clutching complaints. First, it was the emoluments clause. Then it was a personal gift. Then it was they're buying influence and then when they were told,you guys are a bunch of dorks who failed the 72 hour Rule again because it's going to be a governmental asset it becomes we want to finally save tax payer dollars. Lol

They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week.

Soft minds.

"They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week." Rath

...and about other things: Now, they're ALL starting to say, "we're looking ahead instead of behind" when asked about Ol Foggy. Have you noticed that?

We shouldn't let them get away with it, remind them all the time.

This would actually bother me more if "10% for the Big Guy" in any way bothered the Left.

(05-15-2025 06:45 AM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote:  i like how you guys take shifts, coming in here and work, then the next one clocks in and spews the same BS, then the overnight shift

Seek help, the voices in your head are getting louder.

(05-15-2025 07:05 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What I love is the constantly evolving retrovirus of pearl clutching complaints. First, it was the emoluments clause. Then it was a personal gift. Then it was they're buying influence and then when they were told,you guys are a bunch of dorks who failed the 72 hour Rule again because it's going to be a governmental asset it becomes we want to finally save tax payer dollars. Lol

They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week.

Soft minds.

(05-15-2025 07:05 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What I love is the constantly evolving retrovirus of pearl clutching complaints. First, it was the emoluments clause. Then it was a personal gift. Then it was they're buying influence and then when they were told,you guys are a bunch of dorks who failed the 72 hour Rule again because it's going to be a governmental asset it becomes we want to finally save tax payer dollars. Lol

They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week.

Soft minds.

They’re just a pathetic and ignorant group of people.

Egg prices
Refusing to stand for gold star families and pediatric cancer patients
Demanding illegal alien gang members be returned to America
Whining about an airplane that will eventually be Vance Force 1
Complaining stock market down
Complaining stock market back up

TDS and it goes hand in hand with having 0 common sense. It’s a sure fire loser for the Dems so let ‘em keep going. We enjoy the laughs at their expense

If Trump supporters are a cult.. Then libs are a hive mind.

I can't believe this thread is still active.

(05-15-2025 07:05 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What I love is the constantly evolving retrovirus of pearl clutching complaints. First, it was the emoluments clause. Then it was a personal gift. Then it was they're buying influence and then when they were told,you guys are a bunch of dorks who failed the 72 hour Rule again because it's going to be a governmental asset it becomes we want to finally save tax payer dollars. Lol

They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week.

Soft minds.

Dear dumb***…
emoluments clause, personal gift & buying influence are all the same argument.

Again, what difference does it make to you personally? You have never answered that question.

(05-15-2025 10:42 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-15-2025 07:05 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What I love is the constantly evolving retrovirus of pearl clutching complaints. First, it was the emoluments clause. Then it was a personal gift. Then it was they're buying influence and then when they were told,you guys are a bunch of dorks who failed the 72 hour Rule again because it's going to be a governmental asset it becomes we want to finally save tax payer dollars. Lol

They get their weekly anti Trump talking points every Sunday and run with it for a week.

Soft minds.

Dear dumb***…
emoluments clause, personal gift & buying influence are all the same argument.

You are so dang stupid your mamma slaps herself.

Go suck start a shotgun. Do her a favor.

If y'all would stop responding to them, they can piss and moan to each other and we can all be entertained. It's like telling your dog to go start your car for you. You might as well talk to the wall.

They are all in the anger stage of accepting grief.

(05-15-2025 10:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Again, what difference does it make to you personally? You have never answered that question.

What difference does it make to me personally that the President of our country not accept personal bribes from foreign countries that sponsor terrorism?

Perhaps, you’re bright enough to figure that out on your own; or perhaps you’re riding Trump’s jock so snuggly that your fine with any and every action he takes. I’m guessing the latter is reality.

So you would turn down a free plane?

Sure you would.

(05-15-2025 11:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-15-2025 10:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Again, what difference does it make to you personally? You have never answered that question.

What difference does it make to me personally that the President of our country not accept personal bribes from foreign countries that sponsor terrorism?

You had no problem supporting that very thing when Biden* was getting his 10% from Hunter, including from the mayor of Moscow's wife and Ukraine.

In this case Trump isnt accepting a personal bribe. Trump's not getting a jet. The DOJ has said this was perfectly legal. So you can shove the emoluments clause up your ass.

(05-15-2025 11:27 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(05-15-2025 11:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-15-2025 10:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Again, what difference does it make to you personally? You have never answered that question.

What difference does it make to me personally that the President of our country not accept personal bribes from foreign countries that sponsor terrorism?

You had no problem supporting that very thing when Biden* was getting his 10% from Hunter, including from the mayor of Moscow's wife and Ukraine.

In this case Trump isnt accepting a personal bribe. Trump's not getting a jet. The DOJ has said this was perfectly legal. So you can shove the emoluments clause up your ass.

If libs didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all. Just another shining example of their hypocrisy

(05-15-2025 11:25 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  So you would turn down a free plane?

Sure you would.

In a business capacity, I wouldn’t be allowed to accept such a gift from a client or offer anything of significant value to a prospective customer.

Should we give back the Statue of LIberty to France???

(05-15-2025 11:20 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(05-15-2025 10:45 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Again, what difference does it make to you personally? You have never answered that question.

What difference does it make to me personally that the President of our country not accept personal bribes from foreign countries that sponsor terrorism?

Perhaps, you’re bright enough to figure that out on your own; or perhaps you’re riding Trump’s jock so snuggly that your fine with any and every action he takes. I’m guessing the latter is reality.

*Sigh* Still stuck on “personal bribe”.

Still stuck on stupid.

It’s a gift (if it happens) to the USAF, not to your President. We’ve been over this.