(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

And the little sub80 illegal thug is still gone. So there it is

Woke Democrats Who Traveled to El Salvador Are Given a New Nickname - and They're Not Gonna Like It

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Notice how you quietly ignore Politicians taking trips on taxpayers dime to coddle an illegal that should have never been here to begin with.

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

I guess asking for facts to back your baseless rhetorical claims is now not a good thing, it seems to have gotten you lathered up way above the norm. cool cool.

This is the 3rd sentence, so dont read the post, champ.

(04-22-2025 06:22 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  Woke Democrats Who Traveled to El Salvador Are Given a New Nickname - and They're Not Gonna Like It

They all have that damaged chromosome, hormonal imbalance look.

You’re right.
You can’t honestly identify leftists pretty easily just by their appearance.

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 02:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  It's called reading.

Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Just a daily reminder that the leftist trash here on this board and across America screaming about due process, had no problem with J6ers being locked away indefinitely or mind people being arrested for going to church during covid. And those were American citizens not criminal illegal alien border jumpers


Daily dose of liberal hypocrisy. It’s all they have

(04-23-2025 06:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 03:35 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Unless you can come up with some examples for other people to read it’s called “lies you made up”.

I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Yes, I can make mistakes and mishear something. So what? As you said, we all can. You act like I don't try. Wrong.

The rest of that crap reads like someone talking to a 6 year old. GFY.

(04-23-2025 07:25 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Just a daily reminder that the leftist trash here on this board and across America screaming about due process, had no problem with J6ers being locked away indefinitely or mind people being arrested for going to church during covid. And those were American citizens not criminal illegal alien border jumpers


Daily dose of liberal hypocrisy. It’s all they have

Care to cite specifics on the J6ers you scream about above?

Im relatively sure that all J6ers were afforded:
notice of what they are being charged with;
the ability to challenge the arrests and charges;
the ability to hear and challenge the evidence presented;
the ability to present their own evidence;
the ability to assert the right to quick trial, if they did not waive the statute;
the ability to have a right of trial by jury, if not waived;
the right to counsel.

You know, kind of the basics of procedural due process.

Love the same about the covid issue from you. I seem to remember the Covid / churchers actually:

having notice of what they are being charged with;
having the ability to challenge the arrests and charges;
having the ability to hear and challenge the evidence presented;
having the ability to present their own evidence;
having the right to counsel.

You know, kind of the basics of procedural due process.

Look forward to you fleshing out the (what appears to be) rhetorical complaint above.

(04-22-2025 10:45 PM)450bench Wrote:  You’re right.
You can’t honestly identify leftists pretty easily just by their appearance.

Its really amazing. Its like an evolutionary signal to avoid these freaks

(04-23-2025 08:32 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 06:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Yes, I can make mistakes and mishear something. So what? As you said, we all can. You act like I don't try. Wrong.

The rest of that crap reads like someone talking to a 6 year old. GFY.

Well then, stop ranting like a 6 year old!

If you make an assertion, back it up, or don't make it. Simple.

(04-23-2025 09:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 08:32 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 06:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Yes, I can make mistakes and mishear something. So what? As you said, we all can. You act like I don't try. Wrong.

The rest of that crap reads like someone talking to a 6 year old. GFY.

Well then, stop ranting like a 6 year old!

If you make an assertion, back it up, or don't make it. Simple.

How about no. Your demands mean nothing.

Common knowledge is common to non filth.

Do your own research and refute his claims .

Abrego is still abregone

No citation needed

(04-23-2025 08:32 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 06:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:55 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 05:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm devastated.

Sorry I don't save links to everything I read and watch.

Who cares whether you agree? You wouldn't agree if I provided links, genius.

I would certainly care if I was saying actual factual material, or blindly spouting broad baseless stupid rhetoric. Different strokes for different folks.

As for the last sentence, facts are facts. Hard to disagree with sourced factual material. But the whadabout to escape your rhetoric is pretty deep and broad. Im impressed. <slow clap>

But like the proverbial scalded cat, I guess anything like the bolded to escape having to show small basic materials like facts is preferable. Cool cool.

Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Yes, I can make mistakes and mishear something. So what? As you said, we all can. You act like I don't try. Wrong.

Refusing to flesh out your rhetorical scream certainly is not trying. 3A.
Refusing to lend substance to a rhetorical rant certainly does not seem like trying.

Quote:The rest of that crap reads like someone talking to a 6 year old. GFY.

Most 6 yr olds understand that rhetorical claims are..... well..... rhetorical claims.

Many 6 year olds understand that simply repeating braod bull**** that 'they heard somewhere' really doesnt stand the test of veracity.

And how have you dealt with your braod ass thinly sourced comment being denoted as... in diplomatic terms..... a broad ass..... thinly sourced.... comment.

And to boot you throw a snit fit when confronted about.

You have regularly asked me to back up statements. In return, you throw a temper tantrum with some BS idiotic statement that 'you read it somewhere'. Cool cool. I read somewhere where Bigfoot is the advance scout party for an extraterrestrial invasion. I guess that should be broadly repeated as truth using your idiotic level.

I have also read where Trump is Putin asset. I guess that should be broadly repeated as truth using your idiotic level as well. Lolz.

But I am sure you will simply return to your temper tantrum state above. Id prefer you simply back up or give some sort of cite to your broad statement on how due process was denied J6ers. You be you.

(04-23-2025 09:11 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 09:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 08:32 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-23-2025 06:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-22-2025 06:35 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Like I give a sh!t what you think, Clarence. I don't have to prove anything to you or the other board morons.

Here's what I know. I don't lie. Ever. I read politics. I watch politics. I share what I read and hear when appropriate. I also have opinions.

Hell, I post things from X, then you morons simply question the source, anyway.

Deal with it. And if you want to blather on and on, like you always do, feel free. I never read your posts anyway, if more than 2 sentences.

Any chance, at all, that the things you read may not always be truthful and that you may need better sources?

Any chance that you just may not understand something you read or hear?

And you do understand that social media like twitter is designed to show you things and stances that you agree with and support...so you're not going to get an unbiased look at things for the most part.

All of the above translates that what you post, although not a lie, may not be truthful or accurate. Hence, we ask you for proof.

NEWSFLASH, politicians will lie to you. Sources will lie to you.

And I'm not immune to this either...we all make mistakes. And yes, we all have opinions...but they're formed from the things we take in. So don't just take a tweet or news report as gospel. Read other sources. Learn.

You often accuse me of "knowing everything." No, I don't. But on things I don't know, I sure as hell TRY to take the time to learn something about it...and seek out other sourcing...before I run with something. And still, I make mistakes and get things wrong. It happens. I'm not afraid to admit it....

Yes, I can make mistakes and mishear something. So what? As you said, we all can. You act like I don't try. Wrong.

The rest of that crap reads like someone talking to a 6 year old. GFY.

Well then, stop ranting like a 6 year old!

If you make an assertion, back it up, or don't make it. Simple.

How about no. Your demands mean nothing.

Common knowledge is common to non filth.

Do your own research and refute his claims .

Abrego is still abregone

No citation needed

No citation needed that 'common knowledge' need not be substantiated is a true mark of ignorance, Trigger.

Please feel free to scream some more rhetorical bull****. Cool cool.

Just checked. Dude is still in El Salvador.

Almost everything I post has a link or an X post attached. And sometimes I offer my opinions.

There is also a thing called free speech. If you don't like something, refute it, rather than just screaming about the source, or a lack of one.

As for the specific issue about J6ers, I have an opinion that they weren't treated fairly. IDGAF that you have a different one.