(09-22-2022 09:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-22-2022 07:26 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(09-22-2022 10:10 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-22-2022 10:00 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(09-22-2022 07:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  No, in my view, the raid was perfectly fine the moment I saw that it was a months long process and was signed off on by a judge. Until it's shown otherwise, the DOJ/FBI/Judge are also presumed innocent if you will. And that was further bolstered by the undisputed facts that they found exactly what they were looking for. They clearly had credible witnesses within trump world.

Former elected officials can break the law too...you're basically arguing that any warrant served on one is political. God help our country if that becomes any sort of precedent.

You're going to have a HELLUVA time trying to make the case that any rights of trump were violated when a warrant was issued by a judge and they told the SS in advance that they were coming to preform the search, which trump actually watched online in NY.

This sounds very familiar. Wasn't the (Russia, Russia, Russia) FISA warrant signed off on by a judge? Asking for a friend.

And the fact that literally a hundred or so of the items being searched for in this case were found in the basement, and a number more packed in a box in the office along with some Time magazine mementos, speaks fairly loudly as to the accuracy of the underlying warrant in this particular instance.

Kind of a small fact that kind of makes your excuse not so viable.

Just mentioning for a friend.

Most of us remember seeing this dog and pony show before with the aforementioned (Russia, Russia, Russia) and the (we've got the bastard now) legally but falsely obtained FISA warrant. If I remember correctly the LEFT rode that donkey for 3 years with seemingly endless mounds of evidence to support their salacious claims. It was all good up until it suddenly wasn't worth the paper it was typed on and it all fell apart like the proverbially house of cards.

Yeah, you're right the DOJ and FBI would neaaaaaaaaaver create false evidence to support their cause - which is to damage Trump ahead of the '24 election. The list is long of high-ranking people and organizations that supposedly had enough to put Trump away - Lawyer Michael Avenatti, Congressman Eric Swalwell, etc. The common denominator each time has been just another bunch of lies put out to tarnish Trump's name with the public, and to keep him tied up with the process.

You believe whatever you want, but a good lawyer would have the common sense to say, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" when looking at (evidence) provided by questionable parties that have a recent track record of fabricating false information, and an obvious hatred for the individual being accused. Lastly, tell your 'friend' LeftwingTom that you mentioned you created your statement for that I said hello.

Here's a nice timeline of how professional and above board the people are that you seem anxious to hitch your wagon to.

https://i0.wp.com/fatherlyadviceandrants....jpg?ssl=1

I guess you are circling back to the 'it was planted' or 'it was manufactured' explanation.

Got it.

Looks like that ball of poo was taken to task by the special master today when he directed ol Donny to submit to him any issues they have on the inventory list

The tried and true 'Russia' followed by 'they planted it"
One would think there would be better than those stale, yet tried ad infinitum excuses.

Better yet, in the words of Judge Dearie, maybe some proof aside from the wild gyrations......

Seems like you're OK with a "ball of poo" so long as the "poo" came from a friendly source. Not surprised.