(09-22-2022 07:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(09-22-2022 07:35 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  [T]he DOJ/FBI/Judge are also presumed innocent if you will.

Spoken like a good little authoritarian.

And here I'd always thought that the state had the Constitutional duty to establish "probable cause" by oath or affirmation.

What we have here is a hidden affidavit, with all material supporting facts redacted. But I guess that's okay, because now in Tom World the state gets the presumption that their actions are kosher.

What you're asking for is just ridiculous. And pretty sure that's not how this works in any case and likely never has. Further, how on earth can you insist that they didn't establish any probable cause when they ******* found exactly what they said he had, classified information. They laid out a mountain of information for the judge, unredacted, and he agreed. Since when is this process a public one? Especially since this particular one deals with classified information? Even if you believe the idiotic new assertion that trump declassified all the stuff via thought, the stuff was still awash in unredacted sensitive information!