(05-22-2022 08:03 PM)Keeper Wrote:  

(05-20-2022 08:28 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(05-19-2022 08:09 PM)Keeper Wrote:  

(05-15-2022 07:57 AM)Stammers Wrote:  

(05-12-2022 03:22 PM)Keeper Wrote:  First: 16 teams

Second: seed top eight conference champions

Third: seed the eight at large invitees

Fourth: All first round games at the home field of the conference
champions with 20% of seats available to visiting opponent (home team keeps all proceeds from ticket sales)

Fifth: The last 7 games played at neutral sites.

Sixth: Maintain this system for a minimum of 5 years to allow everyone
to come arou:lmfao:nd to realize this is the most equitable system and
is the one that should have always been in place.

So...the #5 and #6 teams in the country play a road game against a Sun Belt or CUSA team. Equitable.

Yep! Home dogs will find a bone sooner than later. The longer the tournament lasts the more competitive college football becomes. I know you only want about 6 teams to ever have a chance to compete, and the Tigers are not in your top 6.

Take a system that is unfair, and come up with a "solution" that is so ridiculous and lacking in common sense, that nobody would ever go for it in a million years.

The Tigers or the top G5 are in my top 8. Teams with 5 or 6 multiple losses, that draw 15,000 to their home games, that nobody cares about, that are ranked #60-80 are obviously not on anyone's list.

So you prefer the unfair system where 2 SEC teams and two other teams are invited to an exhibition tournament. I prefer a system where my Tigers can compete for a national title. You don't seem to have any vision or solution for the Tigers other than for them to cower at the feet of the elite and beg for admittance. I am a liberal and you are a conservative and this is just one example of the difference between the two philosophies.