(04-13-2021 06:14 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  

(04-11-2021 01:21 AM)jdgaucho Wrote:  

(04-11-2021 01:05 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  

(04-10-2021 12:13 PM)46566 Wrote:  

(04-10-2021 11:58 AM)Yosef Himself Wrote:  They're already worse. Not even looking at the team's strength, (they're 11-16 since the move), the team's attendance average even less at FCS playing schools like Montana, Montana State, PSU, Idaho St. etc. The opposite of what they thought would happen.

Honestly I think idaho is good where it is. I think Weber state, North Arizona or even Northern Colorado are better and easier options for both the Big Sky and the WAC to get or lose. It's like how I think the WAC may want to get rid of non football schools eventually. I think the WAC would be happy if the Big Sky takes Seattle to fill a Cal Poly or UC Davis Olympic spot in the Big Sky.

BSC ===> WAC
Northern AZ ---> WAC
Northern CO ---> WAC

WAC ===> BSC
Seattle ---> BSC
UT Valley -> BSC

Seattle and UT Valley are the most geographically northern universities in the WAC...the BSC would be a more Pacific Northwest oriented conference...the WAC would be a more Southwest oriented conference...both would be more geographically compact footprint...

What happens to Seattle and UTRGV's baseball and men's soccer programs??

They'd have to drop them and add Football, since that is a Big Sky requirement.

(And you meant UVU)

Which they (Seattle) won't do. They'd try to keep it in the WAC and if that fails, bribe the WCC or BW to let in those two sports.