(05-03-2021 11:48 PM)pesik Wrote:  it was obvious UC was going to accuse him of something, for months it has been said UC has been trying to find a way to fire him with cause...
UC was going to accuse him of something, we all knew that was going to happen to enable cause.. the whole negativity towards UC was trying to weasel out of paying him by accusing him of doing something bad, that would destroy his character ....most likely overstating something minor or common in most programs

**UC accuses him of doing something bad** (what we all expected)_
uc fans- see i told you he was doing something bad.. as if everyone wasnt expecting this and this is some sorta solid proof he was actually endangering the players

ps i also dont care that he offered to pay for lunch or books (or whatever) for one of his players.....

Cunningham playing the long game. Trumping up a fake letter of reprimand prior to the season laying out specific concerns and stressing the seriousness of John's conduct. What foresight to fake that before a game was played coming off a conference championship so they could come after him later.

Give it a rest.

As an attorney that's a great piece to have. There was no reason for UC to send that letter other than John's conduct and UC being very concerned about something that happened. In really undermines the idea that this was some sort of witch hunt.