(04-10-2021 05:48 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(04-09-2021 03:16 PM)pesik Wrote:  bearcatmark i saw on the Cincy forum that you said, brannen and his lawyer are going "low as hell" releasing the texts with fickell

cincy is LITERALLY trying to make him out to be an abuser and cheater simply to get out of a contract, something that will likely ruin his career and earning potential for his family

we are drawing some weird lines on morality right now

Everything you're hearing is either from the players or Brannen's camp (largely his lawyer wanting to play this out publicly). Uc has been quiet with basically no leaks. All you've heard from Cunningham and uc are a few brief Statements none of which attack Brannen..

Uc isn't trying to tarnish Brannen's name. I'm confident they'd prefer this be settled without having to go public with everything to protect the student athletes and not have to put it all out there in court. Mars and v Brannen want to burn it down and make it a circus. The text has no value in making their case it's to attack uc.
.
I hope uc stays quiet publicly and plays this out through negotiations and ultimately in court if it had to go there.. yea Mars will be able to spin the narrative publicly and some of you will go for it hook line and sinker but uc's job isn't too pr this. It's to follow due process and protect the student athletes and university. But maybe when Mars is the only media source right now it makes sense to take what he's saying with a huge grain of salt.

you publicly suspended him .... the lawyer only started making statements after the suspension... it was obvious uc was trying to fire him with cause (norlander says so himself inthe video i posted)...
people on the UC payroll gave quotes to the athletic article

uc fans are hiding being plausible deniability- "we didn't directly say anything", when it was UC that started this public game with the suspension... in his firing letter said "it was for the well being of the students".. uconn to this day has never said anything publicly about ollie, but yet ollie still has no job an ostracized

the texts have MAJOR value...it's valid proof it is not just brannen but the AD. It gives valid justification to the public that the AD is the issue not Brannen... it makes brannen still hirable at other jobs .. it has absolutely nothing to do with attacking UC... it is actually a brilliant move