(04-15-2021 07:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 10:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

One more time, reeeeeeeeeeBoy. The 68% number is what the forensic audit turned up, and the court agreed to release. (although some worked hard on it not getting released)

This is not what happened. The judge himself imposed a restriction on the release of the report as he wanted it reviewed before release. There was a court hearing in which he agreed to release the report with redactions of any personal information of those who actually conducted the audit and prepared the report. The only objections from the state were to those who were talking about the report before it was officially released in violation of the gag order and for the state to have a chance to review it before the lies and misinformation started. And the state withdrew their objections and agreed to the release.
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politic...537004002/

And again, the 68% "error" rate was not rejected ballots sent to adjudication as an expert who knows the difference between Minnesota and Michigan explains here:

Quote:Halderman's new analysis said Ramsland arrived at the 68% figure by examining the scanner log of a Nov. 6 re-scan of ballots in Central Lake Township, a township in Antrim County. The log included 15,676 lines with Ramsland classifying 10,667 as errors, equaling a 68% "error rate."

But the 68% finding is "meaningless," said Halderman, who is also co-chair of Michigan’s Election Security Advisory Commission. Scanning a single ballot produces multiple lines in the log, "often including many benign warnings or errors," he said.

"This means that the fraction of lines that are errors does not represent a fraction of ballots or votes, the entities for which an error rate would be relevant," Halderman said.

The professor included the image of log error notices and ballot "reversed" notices.

"The warning messages relate to benign instances where ballots did not feed into the scanner correctly and were ejected (“reversed”) for the voter to try again," Halderman wrote. "This is analogous to a vending machine returning a dollar bill that was inserted incorrectly."

Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  The next part is where I explained the dominion systems adjudication process. This was covered by affadavits which said in some of the locations that the adjudicators werent in the same room and were unmonitored by party officials.

And to your claim about adjudication...more on that later...again this partisan "audit" firm is ignorant of what actually happened in Antrim County as explained here by an expert who knows the difference between Minnesota and Michigan:

Quote:He also examined Ramsland's claim that a "staggering number of votes required adjudication," a suggestion that ballot selections could have been changed once they were in adjudication.

"There are several problems with this theory," Halderman said. "First, adjudication occurs after ballots are scanned and poll tapes are printed. In Antrim County, the final reported results match the poll tapes in essentially all cases. Therefore, the final results could not have been altered using adjudication."

In addition, the adjudication functionality was not enabled at all in Antrim County during the November 2020 election, and Antrim did not purchase the application, Halderman said.

"Far from a 'staggering number' of ballots being adjudicated, the actual number was zero," Halderman said. "Therefore, Mr. Ramsland’s theories are completely inapplicable to the incident in Antrim County."

Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'

But go ahead...show me one affidavit for Antrim County......

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  One more time for you; the way dominion systems works is that you vote electronically, THEN your ballot is not counted. Instead it is printed out and scanned, which then counts the vote. If the scan doesnt work, it goes to adjuducation. In adjudication, someone determines voter intent, they then reselect the votes, and a new ballot is printed out and the old one is sent to be destroyed. This means the adjuducated vote will match in any recounts, because the original ballot no longer exists, but was replaced by the new ballot.

For absentee ballots, it works the same way, except that the electronic vote doesnt occur.

Okay, here's where this gets REALLY embarrassing for you. As the expert explained above, Antrim County...and most counties in Michigan...don't even use adjudication. So you really don't know how voting worked in Michigan, do you? Of course you don't...and you're talking out of your ass again.

I live in Michigan skippy...and here's a map of Michigan explaining what each county uses...and my county uses the exact same equipment as Antrim County as does most counties in Michigan.
https://michigan.maps.arcgis.com/apps/we...661b599c2f

And no, there is no printed ballot. Again, you're just making **** up. When you vote in Michigan in person in a Dominion County, you show your ID, fill out a card, and you're given a preprinted paper ballot that you fill out with a pen in bubbles, you know like the tests you took in school? Then YOU scan that ballot into the dominion tabulator machine. As the expert explained, the errors that this fake "audit" firm found are equivalent to a vending machine spitting out a dollar bill...LOL

Lastly, this "audit" firm was just reviewing computer logs well after the election. They were not there when any vote was scanned or counted. So how exactly can they say what votes might have been sent for adjudication or how that process would have even taken place? And again, the counties using Dominion in Michigan don't even use adjudication as the actual expert explained above.

But, feel free to provide the affidavits from Antrim County where this was supposedly witnessed.

So to summarize, no, there was not one unsupervised guy in Antrim County adjudicating ballots...determining on his own voter intent, filling out new ballots on his own, nor feeding ballots back through a tabulator, much less destroying the original ballot as you originally lied about.

And again, this is all complete lunacy anyway as the recount and receipts for Antrim County all support the final certified tally in which trump won the county by about the exact same margin as he did in 2016.

You should really stop embarrassing yourself. If a moron like my can so easily make you look like a fool...well....

Perhaps you need a vacation?

You still have not addressed the expert in here as of yet. But a valiant attempt to deflect this into a bunch of questions on PA and WI that nodoby gives a **** about.