(04-27-2022 01:08 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(04-27-2022 01:06 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-27-2022 12:40 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(04-27-2022 12:36 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-27-2022 11:17 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  ETA: I can't factually speak for him but I suspect he would agree....

When I've said it, I absolutely have not meant it seriously... the entire point is to show how ridiculous it is to accuse someone of racism at every turn, just because they disagree on policy. See Trump, Donald vs Pelosi et al.

Even on here, we get the innuendo. Wish I had a dollar for every time a source for a quote was attacked. I learned long ago not to quote anything from Infowars. I just find a another, more acceptable source for the same thing. Sometimes even the NYT.

You do realize that "you guys" attack sources on the reg, correct? NYT/WaPo/CNN etc.

sure, but for example, if I were to post something from InfoWars, I would quite often be classed with them as to my beliefs. I shouldn't have to continually repeat that I am not a white supremacist

Who continually accuses you of being a white supremacist?

Quote:I attack things quite often from CNN and the rest of the MSM based on content and history. For example, the history of all them working together to declare the Hunter Biden laptop story "Russian Disinformation". Or the content of basing their Russian collusion story on a commissioned false report.

What's your point here, 93? That right wing outlets are equally or more biased as left-wing? I don't think so. JMHO. Doesn't mean they are lily pure.

My point was that you are complaining about having to defend your sources when you post here as if we don't have to do the same thing.

I often post links to news stories from a variety of sources. This is one of the things you and Lad find fault with me about. You guys often attack them, often on the basis of the source. If I am not to be attacked as a fellow traveler, I will go back to posting links from InfoWars.

You guys rarely post links to news stories.