(04-26-2022 12:14 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(04-26-2022 11:13 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-26-2022 10:50 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(04-26-2022 10:40 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-26-2022 09:51 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  Are these numbers your impression of the bias? If not, what is the source?


Throw blame? I'm clearly saying both sides are at fault here.

Numbers are my opinion.

I took your phrase 'prior to Fox' as an indication of causation.

Things have gotten worse sense Fox due to both sides introducing more opinion to their "journalism".

So things would be better if truth and/or dissenting opinions were eliminated? What a Twitter-like viewpoint.

WTH? I don't get how you got to the bolded from anything that I said today but I guess if you're looking to take pot shots at me then go for it, homie.

"Things have gotten worse since Fox..."
Kind of follows that they would be better without Fox. No Fox, no dissenting opinions.

Kind of like "things are worse since it started raining" implies things would be better if the rain stopped.

Not a pot shot, just a logical interpretation.

I'm not your homie.